The Cruelest Hoax that ever was
Started by: markoller 9 months, 2 weeks agoGroup Conversation From:
Anti-Group Group
This group is for all participants who prefer to remain members of Propeller without having to affliliate themselves with groups within the community. Everyone is ...
Other Conversations from Anti-Group Group:
Other New Conversations:
-
The best places to do karaoke in SW Florida?
from group SW Florida Karaoke
-
Travel Tourism In Malaysia
from group Travel To India
-
Online Hotel Booking Information
from group Travel To India
RSS Join the Discussion
+ Add CommentComments So Far: 19
-
0%
markoller9 months, 2 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I submitted a new thread, The Cruelest Hoax that ever was, at http://www.propeller.com/story/2009/02/14/the-crue... but I can not figure out how to download it to Anti-Group Group.
Reply -
0%
markoller9 months, 2 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Suppose the Nazi gas chambers and the extermination of the Jews was was nothing but hideous propaganda, invented by British intelligence, embellished by the Soviets and perpetuated to this day by Israel. It is less absurd than the war on terror. Just take 72 minutes to watch this video. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4138523842... Wouldn't you like to wake up and discover it was a bad dream?
Reply -
0%
markoller9 months, 2 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
For more information, download my Washington Post blog homepage at http://tinyurl.com/688m8q
Reply -
0%
markoller9 months, 2 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
The Hoax of the Twentieth Century: The Case Against The Presumed Extermination of European Jewry, by Arthur R. Butz
Reply
Chapter 1:
Trials, Jews and Nazis
Trials and Doubts
One notable incident occurred when investigator Joseph Kirschbaum brought a certain Einstein into court to testify that the accused Menzel had murdered Einstein's brother. When the accused was able to point out that the brother was alive and well and, in fact, sitting in court, Kirschbaum was deeply embarrassed and scolded poor Einstein:
"How can we bring this pig to the gallows, if you are so stupid to bring your brother into court?" http://www.vho.org/GB/Books/thottc/5.html -
0%
markoller9 months, 2 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
The typical inmate of a German concentration camp was a person being detained for punitive or security reasons. There were five major categories, and they were distinguished by colored insignia, which were associated with their uniforms:[61]
Reply
Table 5: Concentration camp inmate insignia
Color
Category
Green
Criminals
Red
Political prisoners (mainly communists)
Pink
Homosexuals
Black
Asocials (vagrants, drunkards, etc.)
Purple
Considered disloyal on account of
religious views (mainly Jehovah's Witnesses)
At Auschwitz and some other camps, a triangle of the appropriate color was attached to the uniform. If the prisoner was Jewish, a yellow triangle was superimposed on the first triangle, forming a star of David. This is referred to as the Auschwitz "star system."
Economic conditions being what they were, the German government made every effort to use concentration camp inmates for labor. Prisoners of war (POWs) were also used to the extent that such use did not conflict with the relevant conventions, as the Germans interpreted their obligations under them. Thus, Russian POWs were used freely, because Russia did not respect the conventions. Employment of western POWs was restricted to cases where certain legalistic "transformations" into civilian workers were possible, as with many French POWs,[62] or some cases where the work was not considered to be ruled out by the conventions, as with some British POWs employed under conditions to be discussed.
The number of inmates in the entire German concentration camp system was about 224,000 in August 1943 and 524,000 a year later.[63] These figures include only camps referred to by the Germans as concentration camps and do not include any transit camps or camps referred to in other terms, such as the Theresienstadt ghetto or any other establishments intended for quartering families.
It is generally accurate to say that there was no such thing as a "concentration camp" for Jews as such, but this remark must be clarified; there are three distinct categories of Jews, which must be considered in this connection.
First, a fraction of those interned for punitive and security reasons were Jews, and under the national socialist system it was natural, in the camps, to segregate them from the "Aryan" inmates. Thus, sections of the camps could, in this sense, be considered "for Jews." Second, specific legislation existed for the labor conscription of Jews, and many selected specifically for labor found their ways into concentration camps on this basis. http://www.vho.org/GB/Books/thottc/6.html -
0%
markoller9 months, 2 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
This is a brief excerpt from The Holocaust Controversy: The Case For Open Debate, An Introduction:
Reply
Bruno Baum, a former communist inmate in Auschwitz, was allowed to brag in summer 1945 in a Soviet newspaper: "The whole propaganda which started about Auschwitz abroad was initiated by us [German communist inmates] with the help of our Polish comrades." (Deutsche Volkszeitung, Soviet paper in occupied East Germany, 31 July 1945). Thus, it is not surprising to learn that during several trials in Germany, it emerged that the testimony of witnesses from eastern Europe had been orchestrated by communist authorities. http://vho.org/Intro/GB/Flyer.html -
0%
markoller9 months, 2 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Chapter 1:
Reply
Trials, Jews and Nazis
Trials and Doubts
While the IMT and NMT trials were being conducted, several lesser trials were taking place. Among these were the trials held at the Dachau camp (outside Munich and thus not far from Nuremberg) of the staffs of some concentration camps (Buchenwald, Flossenb FCrg, Dachau) that had been captured by the Americans and of those accused of killing 83 American prisoners at Malmedy during the Battle of the Bulge. These trials were supervised by the War Crimes Branch.[38] They were perhaps the most shameful episodes in U.S. history.
The entire repertoire of third degree methods was enacted at Dachau: beatings and brutal kicking, to the point of ruining testicles in 137 cases, knocking out teeth, starvation, solitary confinement, torture with burning splinters, and impersonation of priests in order to encourage prisoners to "confess." Low rank prisoners were assured that convictions were being sought only against higher ranking officers and that they had absolutely nothing to lose by cooperating and making the desired statements. Such "evidence" was then used against them when they joined their superiors in the dock. The latter, on the other hand, had been told that by "confessing" they had taken all responsibility onto themselves, thereby shielding their men from trial. A favorite stratagem, when a prisoner refused to cooperate, was to arrange a mock trial. The prisoner was led into a room in which civilian investigators, dressed in U.S. Army uniforms, were seated around a black table with a crucifix in the center, with two candles providing the only light. This "court" then proceeded to hold a sham trial, at the conclusion of which a sham death sentence was passed. The "condemned" prisoner was later promised that, if he cooperated with the prosecutors in giving evidence, he would be reprieved. Sometimes interrogators threatened to turn prisoners over to the Russians. In many cases the prisoner's family was threatened with loss of ration cards or other hardships if cooperation was not obtained.
http://www.vho.org/GB/Books/thottc/5.html -
0%
markoller9 months, 2 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
THE HOLOCAUST
Reply
CONTROVERSY
The Case For Open Debate
An Introduction
Documents
It is often claimed that there are "tons" of captured German documents proving the Jewish genocide. When challenged on this, however, only a handful of documents are produced, the authenticity or interpretation of which is highly questionable. If pressed for reliable documentation, it is then claim that the Germans destroyed all the relevant documents to hide their evil deeds, or the absurd claim is made that the Germans used code language, whispered verbal orders, or conveyed orders through a meeting of minds.
As a matter of fact, all available documentation and material traces indicate that there was no order for a mass murder of Jews, no plan, no budget, no weapon—that is, no gas chamber—and no victim—that is, not a single autopsied body has been shown to have been gassed.
http://vho.org/Intro/GB/Flyer.html -
0%
markoller9 months, 2 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
How the British Obtained The
Reply
Confessions Of Rudolf Höss
By Dr. Robert Faurisson
The Journal for Historical Review
Winter 1986 Volume 7 page 389
11-27-5
Rudolf Höss was the first of three successive commandants of the Auschwitz concentration camp. He is often called "the Commandant of Auschwitz," and the general public knows of him from a book published under the title Commandant in Auschwitz.
He appeared before the International Military Tribunal as a witness on 15 April 1946, where his deposition caused a sensation. To the amazement of the defendants and in the presence of journalists from around the world, he confessed to the most frightful crimes that history had ever known. He said that he had personally received an order from Himmler to exterminate the Jews. He estimated that at Auschwitz 3,000,000 people had been exterminated, 2,500,000 of them by means of gas chambers. His confessions were false. They had been extorted from Höss by torture, but it took until 1983 to learn the identity of the torturers and the nature of the tortures they inflicted upon him.
The confessions of Rudolf Höss supply the keystone to the theory which maintains that systematic extermination of the Jews, especially by means of homicidal gas chambers, was a historical reality...
Revelations in 1983 About the British Torturers of Rudolf Höss
The Revisionists proved a long time ago that the various confessions of Rudolf Höss contained so many gross errors, nonsensical elements, and impossibilities of all kinds, that it is no longer possible to believe them, as did the judges at Nuremberg and Cracow, as well as certain self styled historians, without any prior analysis of their content and of the circumstances in which they were obtained.
In all likelihood, Höss was tortured by the British soldiers of the 92nd Field Security Section, but a confirmation of that hypothesis was necessary. Confirmation has come with the publication in England of a book containing the name of the principal torturer (a British sergeant of Jewish origin) and a description of the circumstances of Höss' arrest, as well as his third-degree interrogation.
The book is by Rupert Butler. It was published in 1983 (Hamlyn Paperbacks). Butler is the author of three other works: The Black Angels, Hand of Steel and Gestapo, all published by Hamlyn...
http://www.rense.com/general68/hoss.htm -
0%
markoller9 months, 2 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I still have the utmost respect for Rabbi Michael Dov Weissmandl. He saved thousands and he could have saved thousands more, if it were not for opposition by Zionist organizations. Nevertheless, he was wrong about the gas chambers and the millions of deaths. Most of the victims died of typhus and starvation late in the war when the railroads had been destroyed. According to the International Red Cross the death toll in all of the concentration camps was 271,301.
Reply
I have only provided a tiny sample of infomation in the hope that it will spark some curiosity and lead to further research. And always remember, never believe anything or anyone without proof, and always do some cross checking on the Internet. -
100%
markoller9 months, 2 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I want to know why it was necessary to delete this thread from the propeller blog. Perhaps, BECAUSE it was true. The truth is far more dangerous than falsehoods or lies. You better hurry before it is deleted from the Anti-Group Group blog.
Reply -
0%
markoller9 months, 2 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
German totalitarianism
Reply
The following is a revised version of a lecture which I
delivered to the 13th International Revisionism Conference of the Institute for
Historical Review, held on the 29th of May, 2000, in Irvine, California.
Thus France recently installed a telephone hotline: Dial 114 to denounce a revisionist! This is no joke, my friends: a nationwide emergency telephone number which allows the government to compile a list of revisionists. In 1994 Germany had a president named Richard von Weizsäcker who publicly called upon children to spy upon their parents and vice versa in order to discourage the growth of right wing sentiments.
http://www.propeller.com/story/2009/02/16/german-t...
Don't ask why totalitarian censorship is necessary, if one has nothing to hide. Anyone who asks such a quetion, in The United States in English, is violating German law, and is subject to arrest and imprisonment in Germany. -
0%
markoller9 months, 1 week ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Read Bishop Richard Williamson's actual comments on the 'Holocaust'. Download "Bishop Richard Williamson - Gas Chambers, Anti-Semitism and the Truth." http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k6C9BuXe2RM
Reply
I am also amazed by Bishop Williamson's honesty regarding the 9/11 terrorism hoax. He said "the police state is closing in on us," and he quotes from 1984. His religion is insane but sincere. That's his problem. Bishop Williamson is too sincere. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ooGBMFShUVo=related -
0%
markoller5 months, 4 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
It is no longer possible to download my home page at The Washington Post directly. Instead, download "Washington Post" and any of these articles:
Reply
"Extent of Nazi Camps Far Greater Than Realized"
"Dithering Before A Denier"
"Hitler's Terrible Weapon: Publicity"
"Holocaust Denier at the Church Door"
"Death Camps in Poland"
Wait for View All to appear in the comments box. Then click View All. To enter my home page click markoller on any of my messages. Then click comments.-
0%
markoller5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I don't know what happened but http://tinyurl.com/688m8q works again.
Reply
-
-
0%
markoller1 month, 1 week ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
For honest statistics, read "Jewish population losses in the German sphere of influence during the World War II."
Reply
Jürgen Graf
March 2001
The six million figure
http://www.historiography-project.com/misc/graf_je... -
0%
markoller1 month ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
"Holocaust Revisionism" / "Holocaust Denial" Sites
Reply
The following web sites are among the most controversial per the subject of Jewry. "Holocaust Revisionism" web sites typically aim, as self-described, to investigate -- and deflate -- popular convention about the numbers of Jews who died in concentration camps, and the manner in which they perished. They contest existing conventions about Holocaust history -- scholarly or otherwise.
Critics of such attitudes, usually -- but not only -- Jewish (and they are often vehement), typically assail such sites as "Holocaust Denial." Some such critics go so far as to declare that there are no grounds for debate about virtually anything concerning conventional understanding of the Holocaust, codified facts that are held to be beyond questioning. Hence, these kinds of web sites are heavily stigmatized, which serves as a barrier to the fact that they often have large quantities of information about subjects other than their perspectives on the Holocaust.
Our view on this matter is that we do not endorse, or agree with, everything at these web sites (nor, for that matter, ALL the material at ANY other link at our web pages) but we do support free speech and varied opinion in the democratic milieu. And this realm (the challenge to Holocaust conventions) certainly is increasingly part of modern Jewish history.
In the interests of full perspective (although certainly the counter-view to these "revisionist" sites are to be found everywhere in popular culture), we include here also the NIZKOR site, which is antithetical to the others listed here. All these sites have further links to others reflecting their own convictions and arguments, and anyone interested in the details of this debate should be able to find them.
As always, we encourage people to read opposing ideas about any subject and make up their own minds about the merits of the arguments.
Institute for Historical Review (IHR)
CODOH
David Irving / Focal Point Publications
Campaign for Radical Truth in History
Arthur R. Butz
Adelaide Institute
The Revisionist
Nemesis:
NIZKOR (Holocaust Education Resource)
(See also the various Jewish organization links at JTR's home page)
http://www.jewishtribalreview.org/holsites.htm
loading ...
Submit a Story
Advertisement
Join In On This Conversation!