This story is archived
Haliburton Corruption -Hold Corporations Accountable! »
Posted by: Radiofreeeuropa 3 years, 2 months agoThe biggest windfall in the invasion of Iraq has most certainly gone to the oil services and logistics company Halliburton .Vice President Cheney manages to be doing quite well from the deal. He owns $433,000 unexercised Halliburton stock options worth more than $10 million dollars.
Read Full Story at corpwatch.org »
Submitted By:
All progress comes from unreasonable people.
Rats live on no evil star!
Wasilla: All I saw...
Sorry, just palindroming around with terrorists.
Are you still ...
Who Also Submitted:
This Story is Archived and Commenting is Closed
Comments: 39
-


Radiofreeeuropa
Oct. 28, 2006, 3:11 p.m.On numerous posts the hard line republicans on this site have maintained the complete innocence of Dick Cheney and claimed he has nothing to do with Haliburton. I posted this article in response. When you hear that diatribe now you can refer them to this article.
-


bubba2
Oct. 28, 2006, 8:54 p.m.Hey ... you are on a roll tonight ... good posts, including this one.
Here is another link for LOTS of documentation on the BILLIONS of our tax dollars being handed out to Halliburton on a silver platter by the Republicans --
-


mamasan
Oct. 29, 2006, 12:58 a.m.I think the amount of money these swidlers are making is beyond our grasp to comprehend.
They live a lifestyle far beyond most Americans.
Halliburton GOD is watching you and she is not happy...
-


Radiofreeeuropa
Oct. 29, 2006, 3 a.m.Assuming Dems take control of congress I'd sure like to see an investigation into war profiteering.
-


Flashygrrl
Oct. 29, 2006, 9:21 a.m.Isn't Halliburton the one who's been contracted to build detention camps in our US right under our noses for everyone arrested under Dubaya's martial law that he can now impose? Oh, sorry, you didn't know about that? yep...anyone that disagrees with him and probably marches against him can now be arrested. Heil Bush!
-


HektorofTroy
Oct. 29, 2006, 10:09 a.m.This is just disgusting. Halliburton should reimburse the American people for every penny they stole. Which apparently amounts to billions of dollars. This cannot be condoned or forgotten......
-


ADAGUY
Oct. 29, 2006, 10:29 a.m.Anyone care for a gop bumper sticker? I'll bet hiliburton would print them for you at NO CHARGE!
ADAGUY
-


contrast
Oct. 29, 2006, 10:42 a.m.first let me be clear and say that I do not condone this company. I am not defending it either.
This is nothing new. In WWII companies made huge profits...enough to stem a second depression. Companies had to come up with all kinds of stuff just like we see in Iraq. Reconstruction of Europe...american concrete and steel companies made a mint. Same thing here. How did haliburton get the conract simple. They KNEW someone. These companies in WWII? yeah they might of or might not of known someone. Sometimes high ranking officals went to school with some of these CEOs and stuff like that. the first name that would come to mind would be their friend. But if you had to choose someone for the job wouldnt you choose your friend? Like I said I think the thing is wrong (and I would love to see some of those profits go into OTHER american interests) but it's the nature of doing business. America deserves that money since shes giving up her loved ones for it.
-


Radiofreeeuropa
Oct. 29, 2006, 3:53 p.m.Contrast what you say is true but many were threatened with treason charges for war profiteering. Cheney personally benefits...conflict of interest. There is no oversight, this would not have gone unchallenged in the WWII era I assure you.
-
-


Radiofreeeuropa
Oct. 29, 2006, 4:02 p.m.War is good for the stock market.
Billions to made blowing sh** up!
Billions to be made puting sh** back together.
This administration's advisors and in fact many of it's personel are "New American Centuryists". Their basic philosophy is perpetual war against all countries who don't submit to the american corpoate will. And the expansion of the military. Cheney & Rummy are card
carrying members.
They are indeed "MEMBERS" allright! Ha Ha
-


rlgnmksustpd
Oct. 29, 2006, 11:53 a.m.If you check your own congressmans background, you'll find the same abuse. Congress exempted itself from insider trading regulations, so when they vote on a bill, for example, that will benefit a company, they can run out and buy stock in that company. If we had foreknowledge that a company was going to get a lucrative government contract and bought stock, we'd be charged with insider trading.We only hear a fraction of the dealings that go on in Congress. No wonder a third of Congress are millionaires
Rumsfelds old company made millions from the "bird-flu" scare when the government bought up a stockpile of Tamiflu-which has not been proven against bird flu and in fact killed 12 Japanese children. Considering we never had a case here, the stockpile is probably outdated, and will have to be replenished "when the inevitable pandemic hits".
Government integrity, like government intelligence, is an oxymoron.
-


contrast
Oct. 29, 2006, 1:05 p.m.I wish we were less corrupt than mexico...bird flu was a buncha brew ha ha from the start. Fear sells.
-


Radiofreeeuropa
Oct. 29, 2006, 4:22 p.m.Man you are so right,
Certainly the majority of Americans don't condone this.
What would be effective to combat corruption in govt?
1.I say public funding of all election campaigns is a start.
(if those million negative ads did not run these guys would have to actually debate issues. That would be a plus.) No war chest to contribute to? No favors owed.
2. Term limits
presidents can only run twice. Why not congressmen and senators as well? Yes there are exceptions where a carreer politician has been useful but by and large we don't want carreers made out of these positions. 2 terms and bye I say. Don't be there long enough to get too powerful or do too much damage if you are "on the take".
3. Take back those ridiculous cushy benefits!
Want health care addressed? Make congress pay for theirs just like you and I! Want social security solvent? Put Capitol Hill back on it! They have legislated themselves a ridiculous CEO type retirement package and couldn't care less about you and I except at voting time.
These 3 steps would change the corrupt course of politics drasticly.
Any other Ideas out there?
-
-


FrankieT
Oct. 29, 2006, 12:03 p.m.This is just more of the same old, same old. why do we put up with it?????
-


saneman
Oct. 29, 2006, 12:23 p.m.Because people actually think that the U.S. is the greatest country in the world, a good dosing of brainwashing.
-
-


FrankieT
Oct. 29, 2006, 1:45 p.m.Off topic, perhaps, but if yu scratch the surface of every problem the U.S. has, you will find the word GREED.
-


rlgnmksustpd
Oct. 29, 2006, 1:48 p.m.Every war in history has been fought because of greed or religion, usually both.
-
-


rlgnmksustpd
Oct. 29, 2006, 1:46 p.m.Ever notice when theres proof of corruption, the neocons are conspicuously absent from the posts. Any other time they'd be ranting and raving and name-calling, or taking up threads with their personal chitchat. Maybe they think Halliburton and Cheney deserve all that taxpayer money for the "wonderful" job they're doing in Iraq.
-


Radiofreeeuropa
Oct. 29, 2006, 4:45 p.m.I do believe the U.S. is the greatest country to live in except for the last 6 years. I believe this because of Jefferson & Franklin particularly but the founders in general and their remarkable constitution and bill of rights. Their insights were amazing to me. The Bushites have said the constitution is just a piece of paper and have generally acted in a way that has embarassed this country. They have messed with the founders balance of powers, which is critical to safegaurd this country from tyranny.
-


Radiofreeeuropa
Oct. 29, 2006, 5:55 p.m.Also not to bring up a sore subject The U.S. standard of living has dropped in recent years. This I believe is part of what Saneman was having a tough time saying without getting off subject and getting Contrast flustered.
I hope I can shed light without appearing unpatriotic.
These stats are from WHERE WE STAND, by Michael Wolff, Peter Rutten, Albert Bayers III, and the World Rank Research Team (New York: Bantam Books). This information was compiled before 2001 but is the most recent general survey I could find. We did lead the world in standard of living for 40 years, the decline began in the mid 70s with particular downwards motion during the Reagan Years the Bush years have not been analyzed by this study yet but you can bet the results will not be favorable. Again I am a patriotic American, but not a "My country right or wrong"
blind supporter of the direction we've taken lately.
Home ownership, a key ingredient in the american dream:
Ireland 82% Japan 60
Spain 80 Portugal 59
Luxembourg 77 United States 59
Norway 73 Finland 58
Belgium 72 Sweden 55
Greece 72 France 54
Italy 68 Netherlands 46
United Kingdom 67 Germany 40
Canada 64 Switzerland 29
Denmark 60
America's decline in home ownership is symbolic of a larger erosion in living standards, which Americans have met in two ways. The first is that America has gone deeply into debt to maintain its lifestyle. The second is that families have been able to hold ground only because wives have joined their husbands in the work force. (Note: this is a comment on the difficulty of making ends meet, not on working women!) Europe and Japan suffer much less from either of these problems:
here are some sad stats that we lead in.
Poverty level:
United States 17.1%
Canada 12.6
United Kingdom 9.7
Switzerland 8.5
Germany 5.6
Sweden 5.3
Norway 5.2
Children under the poverty level:
United States 22.4%
Canada 15.5
United Kingdom 9.3
Switzerland 7.8
Sweden 5.0
Germany 4.9
Norway 4.8
Deaths from malnutrition (per million):
Men Women
United States 7 13
France 4 9
Canada 5 7
Japan 2 1
United Kingdom 1 2
Norway 0 1
Health Care Expenditures (percent of GDP)4
United States 13.4%
Canada 10.0
Finland 9.1
Sweden 8.6
Germany 8.4
Netherlands 8.4
Norway 7.6
Japan 6.8
United Kingdom 6.6
Denmark 6.5
Average Household Debt
United States $71,500
United Kingdom 35,500
Germany 27,700
France 27,650
Netherlands 5,000
Switzerland 800
Percent of population covered by health care:
ALL NATIONS (except below) 100%
France, Austria 99
Switzerland, Spain, Belgium 98
Germany 92
Netherlands 77
United States 40
Life Expectancy (years):
Men Women
Japan 76.2 82.5
France 72.9 81.3
Switzerland 74.1 81.3
Netherlands 73.7 80.5
Sweden 74.2 80.4
Canada 73.4 80.3
Norway 73.1 79.7
Germany 72.6 79.2
Finland 70.7 78.8
United States 71.6 78.6
United Kingdom 72.7 78.2
Denmark 72.2 77.9
Infant Mortality Rate (per 1,000 live births):
United States 10.4
United Kingdom 9.4
Germany 8.5
Denmark 8.1
Canada 7.9
Norway 7.9
Netherlands 7.8
Switzerland 6.8
Finland 5.9
Sweden 5.9
Japan 5.0
Murder rate (per 100,000 people):
United States 8.40
Canada 5.45
Denmark 5.17
Germany 4.20
Norway 1.99
United Kingdom 1.97
Sweden 1.73
Japan 1.20
Finland 0.70
Rape (per 100,000 people):
United States 37.20
Sweden 15.70
Denmark 11.23
Germany 8.60
Norway 7.87
United Kingdom 7.26
Finland 7.20
Japan 1.40
Armed robbery (per 100,000 people)
United States 221
Canada 94
United Kingdom 63
Sweden 49
Germany 47
Denmark 44
Finland 38
Norway 22
Japan 1
Energy Units of oil burned annually:
United States 791.5
European Community 501.4
Japan 234.3
Germany 108.5
United Kingdom 81.3
Canada 80.4
Netherlands 24.1
Sweden 16.3
Finland 11.1
Norway 9.3
Denmark 9.0
POLLUTION
Debris inhaled per person per year:
United States 81 pounds
Finland 44
Sweden 44
Europe 26
Netherlands 24
Germany 24
Denmark 20
Norway 15
United Kingdom 11
Japan 2
Government spending on pollution control (percent of GDP):
Japan 1.17%
Netherlands 0.95
Canada 0.89
Germany 0.78
Sweden 0.66
United Kingdom 0.62
United States 0.60
Norway 0.54
Finland 0.52
UN freedom index (New 2006 study):
The ranking
N° Country Score
1 Finland 0,50
- Iceland 0,50
- Ireland 0,50
- Netherlands 0,50
5 Czech Republic 0,75
6 Estonia 2,00
- Norway 2,00
8 Slovakia 2,50
- Switzerland 2,50
10 Hungary 3,00
- Latvia 3,00
- Portugal 3,00
- Slovenia 3,00
14 Belgium 4,00
- Sweden 4,00
16 Austria 4,50
- Bolivia 4,50
- Canada 4,50
19 Bosnia and Herzegovina 5,00
- Denmark 5,00
- New-Zealand 5,00
- Trinidad and Tobago 5,00
23 Benin 5,50
- Germany 5,50
- Jamaica 5,50
26 Namibia 6,00
27 Lithuania 6,50
- United Kingdom 6,50
29 Costa Rica 6,67
30 Cyprus 7,50
31 South Korea 7,75
32 Greece 8,00
- Mauritius 8,00
34 Ghana 8,50
35 Australia 9,00
- Bulgaria 9,00
- France 9,00
- Mali 9,00
39 Panama 9,50
40 Italy 9,90
41 El Salvador 10,00
- Spain 10,00
43 Taiwan 10,50
44 South Africa 11,25
45 Cape Verde 11,50
- Macedonia 11,50
- Mozambique 11,50
- Serbia and Montenegro 11,50
49 Chile 11,63
50 Israel 12,00
51 Japan 12,50
52 Dominican Republic 12,75
53 Botswana 13,00
- Croatia 13,00
- Tonga 13,00
- United States of America 13,00
57 Uruguay 13,75
58 Fiji 14,00
- Hong-Kong 14,00
- Poland 14,00
- Romania 14,00
62 Central African Republic 14,50
- Cyprus (North) 14,50
- Guinea-Bissau 14,50
- Honduras 14,50
66 Madagascar 15,00
- Togo 15,00
68 Ecuador 15,25
69 Nicaragua 15,50
70 Burkina Faso 16,00
- Kosovo 16,00
- Lesotho 16,00
73 Congo 17,00
- Kuwait 17,00
75 Brazil 17,17
76 Argentina 17,30
77 Mauritania 17,50
- Senegal 17,50
- United Arab Emirates 17,50
80 Albania 18,00
- Qatar 18,00
82 Paraguay 18,25
83 Timor-Leste 18,50
84 Liberia 19,00
85 Moldova 19,17
86 Mongolia 19,25
87 Haiti 19,50
88 Tanzania 19,82
89 Georgia 21,00
90 Guatemala 21,25
91 Angola 21,50
92 Malaysia 22,25
93 Comoros 22,50
- Zambia 22,50
95 Niger 24,50
- Seychelles 24,50
97 Morocco 24,83
98 Bhutan 25,00
- Côte d'Ivoire 25,00
- Turkey 25,00
101 Armenia 25,50
- Malawi 25,50
103 Indonesia 26,00
- Sierra Leone 26,00
105 India 26,50
- Ukraine 26,50
107 Lebanon 27,00
108 Cambodia 27,25
109 Guinea 27,50
- Jordan 27,50
111 Bahrein 28,00
112 Cameroon 28,25
- Peru 28,25
114 Gabon 28,50
115 Venezuela 29,00
116 Uganda 29,83
117 Tajikistan 30,00
118 Kenya 30,25
119 United States of America (extra-territorial) 31,50
120 Nigeria 32,23
121 Djibouti 33,00
122 Thailand 33,50
123 Kyrgyzstan 34,00
124 Chad 35,50
125 Burundi 39,83
126 Algeria 40,00
127 Swaziland 40,50
128 Kazakhstan 41,00
- Rwanda 41,00
130 Afghanistan 44,25
131 Colombia 44,75
132 Mexico 45,83
133 Egypt 46,25
134 Palestinian Authority 46,75
135 Azerbaijan 47,00
- Israel (extra-territorial) 47,00
137 Bangladesh 48,00
- Equatorial Guinea 48,00
139 Sudan 48,13
140 Zimbabwe 50,00
141 Sri Lanka 50,75
142 Democratic Republic of Congo 51,00
- Philippines 51,00
144 Maldives 51,25
- Somalia 51,25
146 Singapore 51,50
147 Russia 52,50
148 Tunisia 53,75
149 Gambia 54,00
- Yemen 54,00
151 Belarus 57,00
152 Libya 62,50
153 Syria 63,00
154 Iraq 66,83
155 Vietnam 67,25
156 Laos 67,50
157 Pakistan 70,33
158 Uzbekistan 71,00
159 Nepal 73,50
160 Ethiopia 75,00
161 Saudi Arabia 76,00
162 Iran 90,88
163 China 94,00
164 Burma 94,75
165 Cuba 95,00
166 Eritrea 97,50
167 Turkmenistan 98,50
168 North Korea 109,00
These statistics are shattering to those who believe that greater individualism and less government somehow produce better societies. And they should serve as a wake-up call to every American that this country is headed in the wrong direction.
These statistics evoke two common responses from conservatives and libertarians. The most natural response is to blame them on 40 years of Democratic government. This, however, is a giant non sequitur. The very point of this list is that nations with far more liberal governments than ours have created better societies, even with somewhat less productivity. If liberalism were really harmful to a nation's standard of living, then these nations should be doing worse, not better.
Moreover, as mentioned earlier, America's truly liberal government was replaced in the mid-70s by the corporate special interest system, which introduced a conservative agenda of tax cuts for the rich and massive deregulation of business. Corporate lobbyists, and not the interchangeable "Republicrats," have influenced legislation over the past 20 years.
There is a more recent but more general survey at- http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/2149799.stm
-
-


saneman
Oct. 29, 2006, 10:06 p.m.Not to beat a dead horse, but experts in the U.S. have used the following criteria where the U.S. is ranked 13th:
We use life-satisfaction surveys (assembling the average scores for 74 countries) as a starting point for weighting the various factors that determine quality of life. A regression analysis suggests that as many as nine indicators have a significant influence, and can be turned into an equation explaining more than 80% of the variation in countries' life-satisfaction scores. The main factor is income, but other things are also important: health, freedom, unemployment, family life, climate, political stability and security, gender equality, and family and community life. We feed the factors into the equation, measuring them using forecasts for 2005 where possible (in four cases) and latest data for slower-changing indicators, such as family life and political freedom. The resulting score, on a scale of one to ten, gives the quality-of-life index.
-


FrankieT
Oct. 30, 2006, 7:45 a.m.radioFree - what once made our country great was the people who felt it is not 'my country right or wrong'. Today it seems popular to think, 'my country no matter wht they do', and this means considering the constitution not quite so important as our founding fathers made it. Criticism is unacceptable to those in power. Just listen up.
Contrast - Being the greatest power doesn't necessarily equate with being the greatest country unless that is your only criteria. Why do we have so many people without basic health insurance? why do we allow a sitting vice president to continue to have tie, and don't give me the blind trust bull, with a company, when his decisions profit that company egregiously? We have some fixing to do before we will ever be considered great again. And , yes, I want the best for America. I never voted for Bush because he is close to being the worst. Opinion! Ciao.
The first 36 comments are shown. Show all 39 comments »
Submit a Story
Advertisement