This story is archived
Awesome Video on the Mysteries of 9-11 »
Posted by: deirdrehbrt 3 years, 2 months ago9/11 Mysteries Is a great film that shows about The Science of controlled demolition, and What The Media Is hiding from everybody. Help Stop the 9/11 Cover up.
Read Full Story at video.google.com »
This Story is Archived and Commenting is Closed
Comments: 46
-
-
not2needy
Oct. 30, 2006, 12:08 a.m.I can't make an educated comment as i didn't have time to watch the whole video.
-
Zeitgeist
Oct. 30, 2006, 12:39 a.m.Note to the reader:
If you follow this "truth" trail long enough...it leads to the "globalist bankers" as the root cause...otherwise known as JEWS.
You should give pause...look in the mirror...and ask yourself if you are prepared to be an anti-semite or associate with them....
If you are prepared to go on...be prepared for what will natually follow...
You may in fact find yourself one day rifle butting jews into train cars...no...you wont actually be killing them...you'll leave that to others....or claim you didnt know...
But now you do...
A path once traveled...cannot be untraveled...
I thought truthers where kooks a couple weeks ago...
I am now horrified at what I have found.
-
Twistoflex
Oct. 30, 2006, 8:45 a.m.You really are that ignorant and hateful, aren't you? All this time I thought you were only goofing around.
-
-
-
Galahad
Oct. 30, 2006, 2:50 a.m.Yo Zeitgeist,
After all the bashing you've heaped upon the 911 "Truthers," you are now changing your tune? What made you FINALLY see the light?
You owe a HUGE apology to those you've been ridiculing for some time now. If you had left the opinions out of the argument and focused solely on the FACTS, you would've figured it out long ago.
Some people just aren't quite as quick as others, even if in their own minds they believe they are.
Ultimately, it's a question of whether one wants to take the Red Pill or the Blue Pill....
-
Zeitgeist
Oct. 30, 2006, 1:01 p.m.Oh Isee it allright...I see the truthers for what they really are...nazi larva...full of hate....ready to be recruited by jihadists as lilly whites....ready and willing to commit acts of violence.
I've seen your "truth" before...your "truth" resulted in the death of MILLIONS...
-
-
-
obuzzoff
Oct. 30, 2006, 5:06 a.m.When I was in the USAF we had planes (F4c's) catch fire on take off. Pilots cut engines and ejected canopy and escaped as plane slowed to a stop. Fuel fire burning in the open with a tremendeous amount of smoke and was allowed to burn out because it is to hard to put out and bombs on board could go off. The 911 report did not address the foreward inertia of the fuel which I find strange. And the fuel burns real hot with a lot of smoke and I think to many questions are left unanswered. We need to hear from somebody that is an expert on aviation fuel fires.
-
Lurch
Oct. 30, 2006, 5:23 a.m.well, the video mentioned how the airplane fuel, at least on the second one, was consumed within three minutes by the impact and the ensueing fire.
So after the first three minutes, the fire only had carpet, paper, chairs, dividers, equipment, wires to feed it.
I have experience in small office fires and I know this. Stacks of paper, such as 500 sheets of copier/printer paper, are harder than heck to burn. No room for oxygen, so at worst they smolder, at best they don`t burn even if things around them are on fire.
Also, office equipment is made by law with non-flammable material. That is not to say it won`t melt, but it won`t add to the heat.
The video said black smoke is a sign of a fire starved for oxygen. Is that true? If true, then how could the fire be so hot it melted metal?
I`m not convinced, but somebody has a lot of explaining to do.
-
-
ningyo
Oct. 30, 2006, 8:15 a.m.another total bunch of tinfoil hat crap--this woman talks to you like she's on sesame street--which it is for this crowd--watch the building burn see the fire? its hot.. can you spell hot?dont touch it ..its h-o-t it will burn you--anything will burn if its hot enough--even steel and concrete..which the pile of rubble did--it created what was in efffect a coal furnace--thats what melted the steel--not the initial fire..or thermite--all through this video they give one simple explanation after another of what happened--but nooooo.. its hot..can you spell hot?h-o-t? noooo its spelled j-e-w-s..just plain stupid
-
kboy
Oct. 30, 2006, 8:32 a.m.it is obvious that the person edit/creating this wishes none of us has seen an jet aircraft fire. Lots and lots of black smoke. Jet fuel is kerosene distilled to a higher level, but still kerosene. The collapse of the building was caused by heat. The steel structure was designed to be protected by asbestos that the EPA banned in the middle of construction.
The building also was designed for a hit from a much smaller airplane. When the steel melted, the several floors above dropped and each floor below was overstressed and dropped.
-
Twistoflex
Oct. 30, 2006, 9:01 a.m.Your theory was addressed and debunked in this documentary. You obviously didn't watch it. You still don't have the heat to produce pools of molten steel in the sub-basement levels that lasted for over a month-and-a-half after the collapse; you still don't have the core presiding over the wreckage to support your pancake theory; your theory doesn't address the slurry walls which should not have shifted several feet in a pancake scenario ...
There's clearly evidence that explosives and thermate were used ... and there's other evidence which suggests that some kind of classified energy source may have been involved: there are unusually high numbers of non-Hodgkin lymphoma cases among relief workers and cleanup crews involved in Ground Zero amelioration - this disorder is commonly associated with exposure to high levels of ionizing radiation. You also have cars parked on the west side of the collapsed towers with their exposed side car doors fused shut ... this phenomena still has to be plausibly explained.
-
-
Twistoflex
Oct. 30, 2006, 8:47 a.m.I thought that this was a fairly good documentary for this subject matter. The slurry walls section was pretty interesting.
-
-
torrent29
Oct. 30, 2006, 9:06 a.m.I'll take the words of experts over conspiracy theorists any day.
Lot of anecdote and circumstential evidence. Extraordinary theories require extraordinary proof, and they offer up nothing but speculation.
/dismiss
-
allasam
Oct. 30, 2006, 12:10 p.m.Trouble is, most of the conspiracy theorists arrived at their conclusions because they ARE experts!
-
-
LuvMerlyn4Ever
Oct. 30, 2006, 9:07 a.m.The LORD is my shepherd; I shall not want.
He maketh me to lie down in green pastures:
he leadeth me beside the still waters.
He restoreth my soul:
he leadeth me in the paths of righteousness for his name's sake.
Yea, though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death,
I will fear no evil: for thou art with me;
thy rod and thy staff they comfort me.
Thou preparest a table before me in the presence of mine enemies:
thou anointest my head with oil;
my cup runneth over.
Surely goodness and mercy shall follow me all the days of my life:
and I will dwell in the house of the LORD for ever.
-
eddie107
Oct. 30, 2006, 9:27 a.m.You are a sheep, beware of where your shepard leads you, because they have a tendency to lead them to slaughter.
-
-
ningyo
Oct. 30, 2006, 9:11 a.m.even rubble piles of wood at construction sites will burn for weeks and create enough heat to melt or incinerate just about anything--they cover them with dirt just enough to keep it burning without blazing--the core heat is incredible and will burn whatever is buried bricks..concrete.. metal ..whatever..this was a much bigger pile with lots of fuel buried..would have easily melted steel..maybe even hot enough to use steel as fuel..and with very little smoke
-
dreamaker
Oct. 30, 2006, 9:21 a.m.Let me tell you what really this story proves....no no no to the stupid theory that we blew up the World Trade Centers....What this story really proves is all the MORON'S in this World that will be gulible enought to believe anything!
Do you know business's really love U morons, cause they sell crap no smart people would buy and of course low paying jobs like flippin burgers .... Only minorities (not all), rednecks and hillbillies will by this story...
-
LuvMerlyn4Ever
Oct. 30, 2006, 9:39 a.m.dreamaker based on your literacy your entire post is a direct contradiction.
-
-
eddie107
Oct. 30, 2006, 9:33 a.m.Watched it, still holds no validity, listen to the expert, the official explanation makes the most sense and I am sad that a few people are preying on the weak minds of others planting suspicion wherever they can find a weak nitch. Ther are variables in everything. If you didnt find anything unusual, it would have to be devine, there havent been any of those occurences for a couple thousand years.
-
eddie107
Oct. 30, 2006, 9:35 a.m.Suspicious how my first submission never showed up when I posted it. There must be a conspiracy.
-
rlgnmksustpd
Oct. 30, 2006, 10:38 a.m.Whether you believe the theories or not, it is incredibly naive to think that our government, or any goverment, is not capable of killing off a few of its people to acheive a goal. By government, I'm not referring to the entirity, just a few individuals committed to a common goal. Throughout history, we have seen individuals in power create horrendous situations to steer public support for their misguided agendas based on greed or religion, or both. Our leaders have been no exception.
-
Matteu00
Oct. 30, 2006, 11:03 a.m.During the Clinton years I listened to Conservative radio alot and they had guests on who kept saying that a terrorist attack, real or perceived was being orchestrated so that Clinton could remain in power by cancelling the election. I also have the tape of a show in which someone I don't like, but have to give credit too, said that we had our last election in 1996. All elections forward are fixed. I didn't believe any of it at the time. These people all claimed it would be Democrats. They are not on the Right-wing radio guest list anymore.
-
allasam
Oct. 30, 2006, 11:58 a.m.There are WAY too many unanswered questions. Some an honest White House could easily answer:
- Release the complete videos recorded around the Pentagon and confiscated by the FBI. It would PROVE an aircraft or a Global Hawk missile.
- What is that 'pod' attached to the fusilage of one of the tower hit planes?
- Analyse some of the steel from WTC for traces of thermate.
- Why did the Secret Service let the President sit in a classroom for 20 minutes after telling him the country was under attack? His whereabouts were public knowledge.
- Ask structural engineers under oath what happened to the 47 steel cores in the center of the towers and how WT7 could have 'fallen' down.
- Check out that latest plane crash scene in Nigeria and ask yourself why there are NO traces of an aircraft in that Pennsylvania field?
42% of Americans now believe the Bush cadre had something to do with it. People are ignoring the 6 oclock news and looking elsewhere for information. It is now a groundswell.
-
eddie107
Oct. 30, 2006, 12:16 p.m.It is McCarthyism all over again. A paranoid single minded crusade to target the only person in America who is trying to stop the people who attacked us, The Islamic extremists. This will go down in history as the same paranoid delusion as McCarthy's plot to devastate innocent American lives.
"Why" when there are so many in the world who would love to do harm to our nation and our people would you choose fellow Americans to be your focus for attack??
If there were ANY merit to what this video said, there would be a complete screeching halt to everything that Bush has undertaken. And investigations by intellegent reliable QUALIFIED people would end this disscusion.
The answers are right in front of you, watch the video again and they tell you the answers, but your hatred obscures your vision. Get a life, quit trying to ruin others with this garbage!
-
-
contrast
Oct. 30, 2006, 12:20 p.m.I dont have time to watch it all right now but I will! I just have a few questions though? If controlled demo was responsible for WTC collapse why bother with the airplanes in the first place??? And what about the other airplane that was "detonated" or shot down in the sky (the one heading to camp david)? Maybe the video answers them I dunno just two curiosities. I'll watch it in full after this class...and lunch!
-
eddie107
Oct. 30, 2006, 12:22 p.m.To be honest, when I first saw that there was a theory and saw some of the first ideas that had been discussed, I almost hoped that they were true, I found it interesting and scary, but as I sifted through the suspicious events, I found nothing with any validity. Most obvious, the twin towers and that whole pile of very misdirected garbage. I am sorry but I am not desperate enough to see someone defaced because of completely unfounded accusations. The person who made this should be tried for unfounded slander.
-
Hamilton1787
Oct. 30, 2006, 12:28 p.m.Perhaps those of you who think the federal govt is smart enough to run this WTC conspiracy yet not smart enough to find WMD in Iraq could explain why you continue to ignore the conclusions of experts (see for instance http://wtc.nist.gov/) who ARE structural engineers, why you continue to ignore eyewitnesses who saw a large low flying airplane near the Pentagon, what happened to all those people on the airplane that hit the Pentagon, why you don't believe a camera that takes pictures so few frames per minute could miss an airplane going by the camera at 400 mph, why you continue to ignore the Purdue Univ. study that demonstrated an airplane of that size would cause a hole the size that was observed in the Pentagon? Some nut case comes up with a fancy video, has no clue about structures (doesn't know for instance that you don't need to melt steel to cause it to collapse), and you believe him over the analysis of demonstrated experts?
Why do you continue to ignore the obvious?
The first 33 comments are shown. Show all 46 comments »
Submit a Story
Advertisement
