This story is archived

7 Simple Ideas That Can Save the World »

Posted by: Neophile 2 years, 10 months ago

Archived 51 0 drops

The need for more energy and rising greenhouse gases pose a dual challenge to global prosperity. A new vision of conservation-of doing more with less-may be the key.

Read Full Story at msnbc.msn.com »

Submitted By:

Neophile

I'm a Propeller Scout so if you have any questions or concerns, send me a message and I'll be happy to help.

This Story is Archived and Commenting is Closed

Comments: 19

Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)
loquaciousrana
Jan. 23, 2007, 3:02 p.m.
The article does have some interesting and useful tips for conserving energy.
Avg rating: (+6/-0 6)
warjesus
Jan. 23, 2007, 3:06 p.m.
i say lets just colonize the moon by making
self-sustainable eco-system up thier and if we cant get there in time we can just use the same technology to colonize the ocean floor or in side mountains.
catstevensComment has been removed: User banned.
Avg rating: (+0/-1 -1)
warjesus
Jan. 23, 2007, 8:16 p.m.
ok cat say for aguments sake your right...
then what,you think that back to normal weather patterns are going to take all the pollution out of citys i mean really even if you dont agree with global warming you should still agree with mass pollution causes bad health, so you should still be on the enviromentalists side.
or even the fact that oil is a none renewable resourse or that cutting down on usage and going green will mean more money in your pocket.
because oil costs money but sun rays dont.
catstevensComment has been removed: User banned.
Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)
bcellboy
Jan. 23, 2007, 10:29 p.m.
It is without question that the temperature fluctuates over time, it is also without question that the increase over the last century has increased significantly during that time in comparison to increases over the same length of time.
Avg rating: (+6/-0 6)
agentX
Jan. 23, 2007, 11 p.m.
brilliant article. Better get those lightbulbs changed.
Avg rating: (+2/-0 2)
level
Jan. 23, 2007, 11:29 p.m.
It is a heated point to make to first ask what is it we are uncovering with data that has better accuracy day to day, but one thing leads to another whether we like it or not, there is proof in that regard.
We have much to study and it just takes many inventive approaches to make a proof of the same problem.
Sure this article at its length suggests ways to conserve our lack of ration. If we live on a planet that was healthier, what it leads to is a growing population of us.
It seems like human social organizations may as well develop an understanding that they have this ability to destroy their own planet.
Need more of this issue....