This story is archived
Mohammed claims responsible for 9/11: transcript »
Posted by: TechnologyExpert 2 years, 9 months agoKhalid Sheikh Mohammed, the alleged mastermind of the September 11 attacks on the United States, has claimed responsibility for those and other major al Qaeda attacks, according to the transcript of a hearing at Guantanamo Bay released on Wednesday.
Read Full Story at today.reuters.com »
Submitted By:
TechnologyExpert
I am Editor-in-Chief at Alice Hill's RealTechNews (http://www.realtechnews.com). I also have my own blog (Tech-Ex) at http://TechnologyExpert.Blogspot.com. Finally ...
Who Also Submitted:
This Story is Archived and Commenting is Closed
Comments: 517
-
Shankari25
March 14, 2007, 9:09 p.m.Did he confess before or after being tortured? I guess he finally got waterboarded too much.
-
endofdays
March 14, 2007, 10 p.m.I'm sure that of the three hundred or so individuals still being held at gitmo there are a few (maybe even a few dozen) that are innocent victims.
This guy is not one of them.
-
RedskinOK
March 14, 2007, 10:03 p.m.This guy is most definitly bad news, however, he is still not the one we are after. Mastermind or not, I wish they would concentrate on finding the main culprit
-
-
henjean
March 14, 2007, 10:08 p.m.Probablly he is guilty. But we will never know the truth. Does he still have all of his fingers? Has his flesh been penetrated by power drills? Or, is he really guilty?
How guilty is george? How about Dick? Did Ronald play a part? We are getting our young people killed to save face. To make money. Lot's of money.
Let's plan now for change. Change only comes through the voting booth. You need to make sure that you vote. If you don't vote...YOU DON'T COUNT. If you don't vote...YOU DON'T COUNT.
You do want to count, right?
Impeach all of the Republicans with YOUR VOTE.
-
earthlover
March 14, 2007, 10:12 p.m.hard to tell if hes guilty or not now... if the cia didnt employ torture and abuse i might have had more faith in the confession
-
Macondo
March 14, 2007, 10:12 p.m.It is a very delicate statement or confession.
Credibility at this moment may be defined by flipping a coin, 50/50.
is he trying to make points in the word of terrorist or criminals ? Or is it an attempt to enter in history (negative history), but entering anyway!
Is his "confession" a distraction or a symbolic suicide action.
This is to be taken with a grain of salt!
-
endofdays
March 14, 2007, 10:20 p.m.This man has made no bones about his association with OBL. He has been openly or covertly involved in all kinds of crap for at least fifteen years.
There has never been any question about the guilt or innocence of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed. PLEASE READ UP:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khalid_Shaikh_Mohamme
-
Ranjha
March 14, 2007, 10:39 p.m.I don't have any problem in believing that one of these jerks is not responsible for 9/11 providing we thoroughly, honestly and openly investigate the whole matter and give full opportunity to hear all those skeptics who claim that this was an inside job. If they are wrong let us show them that they are wrong and put every thing behind us. I want every one to please comment on this.
-
-
eugenegerard
March 14, 2007, 10:42 p.m.Using Wikipedia for reference is like believing the info that FAUX News puts out.
-
SantaM
March 14, 2007, 11:01 p.m.So torture is bad. We get it. But do this many people really need to jump to the defense of this piece of trash? I thought I was a liberal... but you guys, you choose the world's biggest ****** to make your point about ethics?
It's like wiping the butt of an elephant. You might get that dirty @ss clean, but then you're left standing in his $hit.
And no matter how stupid you all sound, I for one don't believe you're gonna lose any sleep over the treatment of this slimeball.
This liberal won't anyway.
-
WCFIELDS
March 14, 2007, 11:04 p.m.I'm pretty good at discerning innocent people. This Mo Hamed Qualide shake blah blah is clearly innocent. I believe him to be an honest shoe repair assistant. Yeah, I can tell just by lookin'.
-
Sandmn
March 14, 2007, 11:21 p.m.From the looks of the guy, he couldn't navigate his way home from the grocery, much less an attack of this complexity. Isn't it interesting how he confesses after being held prisoner in a torture camp? Smells like Nuremberg.
-
endofdays
March 14, 2007, 11:22 p.m.not so much biased... but they often refer to "un-named government sources" and the such when citing facts. Although, you're right - they always flag when sources are sketchy or unconfirmed.
I like Wikipedia and use it all the time.
-
kobzikov
March 14, 2007, 11:49 p.m.I thought that the apex in mockery of justice reached by Stalin's show trials of Military leadership in purges of 1937 would never be surpassed by the western judicial system.
Yet considering that Stalin's mock trials were widely publicized and western reporters were present, I must concede that in the regard Bush administration once again proved me wrong in how far it would go to trample on any semblance of justice and human rights.
-
HanymanComment has been removed: User banned.
-
Zeitgeist
March 15, 2007, 12:10 a.m.Ah...the moonbats cheer for Khalid Sheikh Mohammed...they lament the injustice to the poor little mass murdering jihadist..
Aggravated moonbattery...
-
Itsmybank
March 15, 2007, 12:14 a.m.All right. I will stand up. and point a finger at who was behind 911. It took me over 5years. to see it. Hidden in plain sight. I know before I lift the wool from your eyes. That there shall be comments that will be aimed at me. My mental health, Far out into space, idiot, ect.
I shall ask everyone who reads what I am going to say. And they comment not on my well being. but strickly on the evidence presented. If you read this and shall see a comment that has nothing to add of substance, please diregard that comment. For it can only be from one or the other type of people.
The first type. just your run of the mill person who has not the sence God Gave a Jack a__. The 2nd. some one with an agenda, to disstrackt you from tyhe evedence. And try bto cause confussion.
The agancy is the NSA nothing FBI CIA ect. does not happen without the ok from them.
All intellegance is processed through them. It is in there mission statement.
Fact NORAD stood down for all most 2 hours.
-
Itsmybank
March 15, 2007, 12:16 a.m.Fact The anti aircraft defence that surronds the pentagon was by passed.
Fact the FBI agents were told to stand down there investigation and servaliance, Of some of the supposed hijackers.
Fact the tape made by the air traffic controllers was destroyed no one held accountable.
Fact Silverman who purchased the world trade center complex just months before. Was paid billions on the insurance policy taken out against terrorist attacks. Confessed on public tellevision, That he gave the orders to pull building 7.
Fact BBC twenty minutes before building & was pulled was reporting it on live TV. Not only can you see the building standfing behind the reporter. Who is telling you it collapsed. But was saying how it came down in Quote "its own foot print" Where are these guys super bowl sunday.
-
Itsmybank
March 15, 2007, 12:20 a.m.Some jerk in a cave n o more had a hand in that then I did. Not saying as cia opertives as is ammited al qui da was No.
Fact 5 israilies arrested. who where vidio tapeing the event. How did they know in advance to set up the camera. Deported. hmmm?
NO ONE BUT NSA
that is how I see it good day
-
-
NelsonR
March 15, 2007, 12:36 a.m.Now we have to face a known Islamist terrorist attain free press and notoriety while becoming a martyr for Islam.
The Anna Nicole scenerio repeated.
That is why my viewpoint was not based on liberal ideals. America will again lose with the agenda of making a sadistic individual a celebrity on the world stage. I am an advocate for Free Press but facts are facts, this is ridiculous.
What rights do these terrorist show us and where is the compassion for American rights when captured. I find it silly to think your argument will be, but we are on the moral high ground and we should not sink to their level. Let me first say I am strongly against this war and Bush but you cannot fight a war, right or wrong we are in it, and turn our cheek while being morally abused. You fight fire with fire. These terrorist are not from any known recognized nation and they do not wear uniforms. Please no Geneva Convention rules. They do not obey them either.
-
HanymanComment has been removed: User banned.
-
The first 307 comments are shown. Show all 517 comments »
Submit a Story
Advertisement
