This story is archived

Apple planning to sell non-DRM'ed music »

Posted by: joeprogrammer 2 years, 9 months ago

Apple has formed a deal with EMI that would allow them to sell their content, and more importantly, sell large portions without the Digital Rights Management copying restriction that is placed on all songs bought from the iTunes Store.

Read Full Story at uk.reuters.com »
Submitted By:
joeprogrammer

This Story is Archived and Commenting is Closed

Comments: 20
  • Avg rating: (+2/-6 -4)icelander
    icelander
    April 2, 2007, 10:31 a.m.

    I think that this was in the works all along. The record companies are stupid, skittish dinosaurs. Before the iTunes music store, they equated the Internet with stealing. Apple got them to realize that this is a great way to sell music.

    Now that they're not afraid of the Internet, Apple's going to wean them off of DRM and show them that their customers aren't criminals. This is fantastic news.

    • Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)colcam
      colcam
      April 2, 2007, 12:29 p.m.

      Good old eBay works because most people are honest; not just the "most people who visit eBay," but most people, period. An excellent move on Apple's iTunes front.

      • Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)DailyDose
        DailyDose
        April 2, 2007, 1:34 p.m.

        I heard on NPR that the non-DRM tracks will cost 30 cents more.

        • Avg rating: (+5/-0 5)Wil
          Wil
          April 2, 2007, 2:06 p.m.

          This is great news, and a step in the right direction for digital music and the music industry.

          There's some commentary on this from Daniel Miessler here: http://dmiessler.com/archives/1248

          • Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)icelander
            icelander
            April 2, 2007, 3:39 p.m.

            The bigger question is whether indie labels will be able to get a similar deal.

            • Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)beertech
              beertech
              April 2, 2007, 6:14 p.m.

              good news. drm is bs :) interesting development for sure.

              • Avg rating: (+1/-0 1)ZackofSpades
                ZackofSpades
                April 2, 2007, 7:55 p.m.

                Could someone explain to me why this would increase the price?

                30 cents is increasing the cost per song by a third...

                • Avg rating: (+4/-2 2)Macondo
                  Macondo
                  April 2, 2007, 9:50 p.m.

                  "To pay or not to pay it is the question!"

                  If songs were at 25 cents I would pay for all of them, not at 1 dollar a piece.

                  The rest is marketing dynamics.

                  You could pay $15 for a bulky CD of which you like one or two songs, you could pat nothing for a less than perfect MP3 download or you and the industry could be more realistic going to the middle of the road.

                  • Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)GregD
                    GregD
                    April 2, 2007, 9:49 p.m.

                    I think this is wonderful news and a step in the right direction.

                    • Avg rating: (+10/-0 10)terengyriser
                      terengyriser
                      April 2, 2007, 10:26 p.m.

                      Eternal vigilance is NOT the price of freedom!

                      $.30 is!

                      • Avg rating: (+6/-0 6)GregsBall
                        GregsBall
                        Aug. 22, 2007, 9:56 a.m.

                        http://reddit.com/user/levitra_online/

                        levitra

                        levitra online

                        • Avg rating: (+1/-0 1)nocomments
                          nocomments
                          Sept. 16, 2007, 12:03 p.m.

                          Very good news ... thanks http://www.gwafi.com/news.html http://www.gwafi.com/story.html

                          The first 17 comments are shown. Show all 20 comments »