This story is archived
Patriot Act powers too broad? »
Posted by: populist 2 years, 7 months agoWhile most of Washington is riveted to the appearance this week of U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales before the Senate Judiciary Committee in the controversy over the U.S. attorney firings, there was another showdown recently between that committee and the Bush Administration that highlighted the new expanded role of Congress in the oversight
Read Full Story at bangordailynews.com »
Submitted By:
The essays we offer are unapologetically presented for you to read & analyze. Many are offered as a similar view to ours & others simply to invite ...
Who Also Submitted:
This Story is Archived and Commenting is Closed
Comments: 8
-
-
-

anioklyComment has been removed: User banned.
-


Watchemoket
April 20, 2007, 6:23 p.m.Is this a trick question? OF COURSE the so-called USAPATRIOT Act (it is an acronym, like the military and most of the radical right like to use) is overbroad. Even if it were not explicitly so generous to law enforcement at the cost of personal liberties, the Bush Administration would have issued 'signing letters' to make it overbroad.
And ani, what on earth (the real Earth, not the fantasy version that you appear to live in) makes you think that a) the unPatriot Act "has prevented another attack on our soil for over five years;" and b) it is neatly tailored to accomplish its stated purpose with the minimum interference with personal liberties?
-

anioklyComment has been removed: User banned.
-
-


jordan11
April 21, 2007, 9:24 a.m.the law has prevented another attack on our soil for over five year>>>>
And you know this....how?
-

anioklyComment has been removed: User banned.
All 8 comments are shown.
Submit a Story
Advertisement