This story is archived
9/11 Truthers Should Thank Fox News »
Posted by: entropy 2 years, 6 months agoIn their typical style of reporting news two weeks later than the rest of us, Fox news, has finally caught up with the alternative media in reporting the story we first broke here on April 23rd that John Kerry recently referred to the collapse of WTC building 7 on 9/11 as having been 'done in a controlled fashion'".
Read Full Story at infowars.net »
Submitted By:
entropy
"Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event - like ...
This Story is Archived and Commenting is Closed
Comments: 143
-
entropy
May 10, 2007, 4:23 p.m.These kinds of things always just end up with name calling which always leads to no where.
But my favorite part of the video is at around 2:50 when they show the video of WTC 7 collapsing...and Hannity begins to say "So are you saying just because it looks like a controlled demolition it means it is...and then stops himself from finishing that statement since it would just destroy his own argument.
The video of John Kerry saying that the WTC 7 was brought down in a "controlled fashion" is also on that site.
-
-
Sabretooth
May 10, 2007, 4:54 p.m.Interesting, the more venom and hate they spew trying to suppress or control information about 911, the more people begin to question why.
Good luck in your quest for truth and hopefully all who helped 911 along will be discovered and brought to justice. I actually remember when OBL said he had nothing to do with 911, i thought he would be bragging about it. Later they found the OBL tape where he suddenly became a right handed man instead of left handed and he had changed his mind and decided he was behind 911...can you say flip flop.
-
torrent29
May 11, 2007, 8:58 a.m.Few people reported explosions. Nor did the building fall in pancake style.
Just like the so called 'magic bullet' theory there is a lot more to the collapse then most conspiracy theorists actually care to read about.
-
torrent29
May 11, 2007, 9:09 a.m.You know this is the best part of any post. Let me show you what a real demolition looks like.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=79sJ1bMR6VQ
Take special note here of about everything around, the sound of the blades overhead and then the sound of the explosions that are easily overheard, thats how loud it is. Note the explosions that go through the ENTIRE building.
Now note this:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-540555...
In fact very few people reported explosions of any sort, what they did report though was it 'sounded like explosions' but no one reported witnessing an explosion of any sort.
-
Reignman
May 11, 2007, 12:31 a.m.Oh you morons wont stop with the conspiracy theories.. Dont you have anything that resembles a life??? I mean please seek serious councelling and therapy... Stop doing drugs, get gainfully employed and stop worrying yourself with moronic issues or theories such as these, and you will be alot better off... But what should we expect from the liberal loons!!!! Lets not forget that Bush blew up the levees in New Orleans, and that he PERSONALLY steered the hurricanes into the state... I mean its really idiotic...
-
Taganan
May 11, 2007, 12:45 a.m.Truthers will believe anything that fits their template and reject anything that doesn't. There are people who are so gullible they will believe anything that fits their preconceived beliefs in conspiracies of people in government. It is no use to show them the facts, they "know" the facts, because they were told them by another Truther who got his "facts" the same way. They are not really sane.
-
nostalgia
May 11, 2007, 6:09 a.m.Seems I read this story over a week ago. Did Drudge have a link to it?
I don't watch Hannity and Colmes.
Has any other news organization reported on this - ABC, NBC, CBC, CNN, MSNBC, CNBC?
-
7734
May 11, 2007, 8:12 a.m.What? And steel doesn't melt. Will someone plllleeeeeaaaassseeee beam me up and out of the midst of morons who cannot, will not, use logic. Of course there were explosions in those buildings after the planes hit. Think, think of what was in those buildings and all high rises. You might just have an inkling of original thought and figure it out. If you had the slightest bit of brain matter you would check out the construction of those towers and with the use of a little freshman highschool math you might, just might, be able to come to the simple conclusion that the method of contstruction would not have sustained the impact of that much weight and heat from JET FUEL!!! And please, don't bring up the Empire State building hit in '45 by a B-25. The two cannot remotely compare. Buildings built differently and the size of the aircraft and types of fuel used were completely different. The old AVGAS burned at a less volitile rate and intensity than the new jet fuels. Truthers - BAH!!
-
-
unome2
May 11, 2007, 8:26 a.m.The fact that millions of American are questioning the official story and our government does nothing to try and bring any clearity to this tragic mass murder suggests some type of coverup is going on.
Hundreds of books have been writen about 9-11 and the vast majority at the very least imply government involvement. The major media for the most part simply choose not to touch the subject, or if they do, those who contradict the official 9-11 story are ridiculed.
Those who believe Bin Laden and his merry men out smarted our multi-billion dollar intelligence industry and out manuvered our milti-trillion dollar military empire are more likely, in the words of Hannity and Colmes, the conspiracy wingnuts.
-
-
crghss
May 11, 2007, 9:19 a.m.Where any of you there? Where any of you truthers at the shrine of you ever so holy conspiracy. Why is it none and I mean none of you wing nuts where ever there before, during or after the attack. If you where then you would understand the enormity of the event the sheer size and destruction on a mass scale. But of course you weren't. Because your too busy sitting behind your keyboard proving how much smarter you are then everyone. How sad people take one of the most horrific events in the history of the US and twist and manipulate it to massage their own self-esteem or push their political position. But fortunately most of you are pretty much harmless. You'll never get up and really do anything important or significant with your lives except sit there furiously typeing away with your '70 UFO mentalities'. Sure that there is some cosmic being or grand wizard thats conspiring against us.
-
crghss
May 11, 2007, 9:19 a.m.If it wasn't for hurt and pain that you mental midgets cause families and victims of that event I could care less. But that's what you do. For all your so called clairvoyance you can't see that's the end result of your actions. So sad, so so very sad.
-
coolicula
May 11, 2007, 10:02 a.m.I really attempted to make an objective review of this story, even though it had Kerry's name attached, but I pooped out after the second paragraph! Where do I go to get the last five minutes of my life back?
-
-
anioklyComment has been removed: User banned.
-
7734
May 11, 2007, 1:08 p.m.torrent29
Got new for you fella. 2/3 of the men and women I served with in 28 yrs in the military were your so called repuglicans. THEY served their country so you have the f'n freedom to say what you say. Get a real life numbnuts.
-
7734
May 11, 2007, 2:29 p.m."Right, he served his country, unlike half of the repuglicans."
Your statement. My experience is that 1/3 of dems served their county. So, guess that makes Kerry better than 2/3 of his fellow bleeding hearts. Still doesn't make him anyone I would trust further than I could throw him. Kerry is a whinning weasel who will do anything to get reelected and put the screws to the American people........OH S..T! That describes EVERY politician.
-
-
Karmina
May 11, 2007, 2:39 p.m."Any controlled demolition is a massive undertaking. It takes months and months of planning, of work, of experience, and lets not fool around here, thousands of people would have to be involved. Yet not one of these people came forward."
Torrent 29, excellent point. I wish others would point that out. I would carry on a little farther and ask how WTC7 could have been prepared for demolition without those working in the building finding out and talking about it. Nobody is asking that question! And, it's such an obvious question to ask!
-
Tcaros
May 11, 2007, 2:50 p.m.Planes destroyed the WTC. I'm not big on conspiracy theories. Conspiracy by it's nature is very difficult to prove. First, here's a tactic that they really use. Always get your story out so you can control it. Create a "wild" conspiracy that can be easily debunked. That way it will be very hard to convince the public of any conspiracy afterwards. The truth may be lack of action. This fits in well with this administration since after laws are broken they fail to convict "they say mistakes were made."
Now here's something to think about. Solve things in reverse. The 9/11 Commission report found we knew about credible threats, but failed to act. That is the smoking gun.
How would you convince Americans to give up their Constitutional rights to privacy and civil liberties as provided in the 4th Amendment and Bill of Rights? There's no way Congress or the Senate would ever pass laws to abridge these basic rights.
-
Tcaros
May 11, 2007, 3:04 p.m.Why would someone want to abridge these rights. Maybe, because it was going to come out that the NSA was spying on Americans. By legalizing it no one loses their job or goes to jail now. The President affirms we need this to "fight the terrorists." They already admitted it was going on before 9/11, but have never come clean as to the extent.
Oh, the war was for getting rid of a ruthless dictator and making some money in the process. Instead of finding Bin Laden we go after an old enemy. Bin Laden slips through the cracks. Now that makes sense... because we see who gains now. Still hard to prove, since the nature of a conspiracy is to keep from going to jail while you do some pretty bad things.
The New York Times in 2005 broke the news about the illegal domestic spying. Was this some intentional leak to get it out in the open in a "limited way?" Shortly afterwards Bush attempted to justify it and work on legalizing it.
-
Tcaros
May 11, 2007, 3:02 p.m.On March 9, 2007, the US Justice Department released an internal audit that found that the FBI had acted illegally in its use of the USA Patriot Act to secretly obtain personal information about US citizens.
The truth of the matter is we need alot more oversight of our intelligence agencies, contractors, and activities.
-
The first 96 comments are shown. Show all 143 comments »
Submit a Story
Advertisement
