This story is archived
Loose Change Creators on The View May 24th »
Posted by: entropy 2 years, 5 months agoAccording to a release from ABC, Korey Rowe and Dylan Avery, creators of the 9/11 conspiracy documentary Loose Change will appear on the May 24th show. Also listed is William Rodriguez, who was a janitor at the North Tower of the World Trade Center, who has since become part of the 9/11 truth movement.
Read Full Story at watchingtheview.com »
Submitted By:
entropy
"Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event - like ...
This Story is Archived and Commenting is Closed
Comments: 89
-
entropy
May 17, 2007, 3:15 p.m.Wow, I guess the whole "Rosie got gagged and can't talk about 9/11" idea is completely wrong. I don't think she's the greatest thing since sliced break like some people, but I definitely admire her courage and devotion.
-
-
eugenegerard
May 17, 2007, 4:37 p.m.Disney covered up the DC Madam call list story because Cheney and his military planner of the Iraq war were on it. I hope Disney doesn't get near this.
-
-
engineer
May 17, 2007, 6:01 p.m.Let the truth come out about 9/11 in detail. Thank goodness the producers of Loose Change will get to air on a major network.
-
-
spkguy
May 18, 2007, 12:26 a.m.Multiple Failures of the Air Defense Network to Protect New York City and the Capital
On September 11th, there were fighters in the air less than five minutes away from the Twin Towers when the first was hit, 25 minutes after Flight 11 was believed to be hijacked. There were a number of air stations with combat-ready fighters within ten minutes' flying time from the New York City and Washington targets. There were well-established automatic procedures for intercepting aircraft that were either off course or had lost communication. Yet there were no interceptions of any of the four hijacked aircraft, with the possible exception of Flight 93, whose interception and shoot-down is officially denied. What conclusions can be drawn from this failure, given the awesome capabilities of the air defense network?
http://911research.wtc7.net/planes/defense/inde...
Remember when pro golfer Payne Stewarts plane crashed?
-
ETproductions
May 18, 2007, 1:05 a.m.For a long time I dismissed the 911 conspiracy as just another looney conspiracy theory. But as the depth of corruption and outright criminal activity of the Bush administration, primarily headed by Cheney, has emerged, I would like to see this investigated.
Bush is SO determined to see himself as a War president of the likes of FDR and Harry Truman. In his own words, "I'm a War President. I'm the Decider. I'm the Commander Guy." A guy like Cheney could easily use an egomaniac like Bush.
And the PNAC paper that preceded to 2000 election and predicted (lobbied for) the attack on Iraq said that it should be done for global dominance of oil reserves, but that it would take a Pearl Harbor style attack to make it possible to sell to the American People.
Is that paper the handwriting on the wall? Let's find out, Rosie or no Rosie. We owe that to the brave Americans who gave their limbs, parts of their brains, and all too many their lives for this misguided debacle.
-
stephen-johnson
May 18, 2007, 9:50 a.m.Funny how the same government these two film makers expose as murderers in their "documentary" allows them to walk about freely.
-
ZenAgain
May 18, 2007, 11:21 a.m.As a non-American, I've watched Loose Change and Screw Loose Change to try and get both sides of the story. No doubt about it, it's a tragedy that has shaped the new millenium for years to come. The thing is, the retorts that supposedly de-bunk Loose Change are so flimsy and ambiguous, they still don't provide a definitive answer. For goodness sake, there must be a mountain of information- let it out and put people's minds to rest.
On another thread the other day somebody went into attack mode and posted a link to the Popular Mechanics editor meeting the researcher to Loose Change. The best that video came up with was a Coroner changing his mind five years after the event.
Sorry mate, but you're going to have to come up with something better than that.
-
schillinfl1
May 18, 2007, 11:34 a.m."Never in the history of Physics has fire melted steel"
-Rosie (2007)
Thanks for that slice of brilliance Rosie.
How anyone can take her seriously after that is beyond me.
-
Truzseeker
May 18, 2007, 11:44 a.m.ZenAgain, there is much more research than produced by the Loose Change group, and getting both sides of the story here results in name calling from the other side. Lackies such as Hannity and O'Rielly having nothing but contempt for the global facts associated with the attack. I am still trying to reason why our own air force failed to engage the high jacked jet liners before they hit the towers.
-
-
THOMNH62
May 18, 2007, 1:16 p.m.it is Rosie or it is wrong thats just how she is. I had a wife like that once, now she is as big as Rosie and driving some other poor bastard crazy. This country is fuked up for sure.
-
MajJohn
May 18, 2007, 2:14 p.m.Good grief, let's hear from the North Tower janitor, lets leave no stone unturned. No one can give us a more complete "view" than the janitor. I can only hope he speaks English!
-
pmcluver
May 18, 2007, 2:30 p.m.Steel is made by a process IN FURNACES where it is molten.
So yes, it is at birth melted. But the temperature at which is created is incredibly high and much higher than burning jet fuel could ever reach--(especially as that burning jet fuel evaporated in a matter of seconds or at most minutes.)
Now think about it, IF the temperature in and around the hole at the WTC was high enough to melt steel, it would have EVAPORATED people. BUT THERE WERE PEOPLE STANDING IN THE GAPING HOLES OF THAT BUILDING waving and begging for help! That's not fanciful theorising, that's a physical fact.
A person who MAKES steel discusses this on the following video.. so all of those commenters here who make snide remarks about steel melting, (let's just keep it our secret) should get more facts and think again.
Watch this and get informed!
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-710213...
-
Stormweaver
May 18, 2007, 2:41 p.m.every time i hear of the view it makes me think of that episode of Family Guy with the chickens all around the table.
-
pmcluver
May 18, 2007, 2:47 p.m.Dear President luver... yes indeed it may have and most certainly DID cause the instant evaporation of victims at the crash site. BUT THE STORY of the collapse is that the buildings came down because ALL the steel columns of the building melted -- ALL, not just around the impact site.
Are you SO loyal to your political convictions that it has disenabled your ability to THINK!
-
4cprocess
May 18, 2007, 4:05 p.m.Maybe Rosie ought to buy the rights for this show and change the name appropriately to "The Spew"!
-
MacR
May 18, 2007, 5:09 p.m.I just love how all you troofers think that there were not other products in that building that would burn. I have given all kinds of examples of things that would be kept on the floors of high rise buildings. Show you that your average office holds more items than a typical home that is a hazard for fire.
To those of you trying to prove to these people that there are other items along with an impact from a jet liner that was a 757, that caused mass destruction. Wow, you know that concept is lost on these people.
You will always have your people say it was the Gov't that did this. Even though you do not see the massive detonation on each floor from explosives. You see impact dust from beams giving out and floor colapsing on each other. You know the detonations they say are happening but if you watch a real demo you would see large puffs of white smoke. Not dust grey and black. Wow, another line I have heard being given to the troofers. Yet they fail to see the fact.
-
bluejoewho
May 20, 2007, 4:04 a.m.you debunkers really make me laugh. First of all, you would have to be a moron to mix up molten steel and aluminum. Several witnesses saw molten steel. Its a fact. Get over it. Only explosives could of done this period. I'll let you reply to that first. And then I'll shoot down the rest of you snide asses that think you know it all.
-
JUMBOFRY
May 25, 2007, 11:13 a.m.JET FUEL CAN NOT BURN HOT ENOUGH TO MELT THE STRUCTURAL STEEL USED IN THE TRADE CENTER..YEAH SHE MAY HAVE PARAPHRASED BUTT IT IS A SCIENTIFIC FACT.....
THIS 5 MINUTE VIDEO CLIP EXPLAINS THE WHOLE THING !
COPY AND PASTE THIS TO YOUR BROWSER, WATCH IT, THEN POST A RESPONSE, AND EXPLAIN TO ME HOW YOU CAN STILL SAY IT WASN'T A PLANNED DEMOLITION
-
ironmaidenjen1
June 20, 2007, 4:39 a.m.9-11 was an inside job..only idiots believe in bush and trust in bush, the guy is the worst president and leads a criminal regime,
All 89 comments are shown.
Submit a Story
Advertisement
