This story is archived

David DeWolf: Evolution and Dissent »

Posted by: stephen-johnson 2 years, 5 months ago

Some may have the illusion that science is devoid of politics. But whether we debate the efficacy of a pharmaceutical drug, the risks of electromagnetic radiation, or the potential benefit of embryonic stem cells, financial and ideological agendas are not easily set aside. As bad as political correctness may be in the humanities and social sciences

Read Full Story at boston.com »
Submitted By:
stephen-johnson

Out to lunch without a sandwich

This Story is Archived and Commenting is Closed

Comments: 9
  • Avg rating: (+5/-0 5)stephen-johnson
    stephen-johnson
    June 11, 2007, 1:29 p.m.

    From the article:

    But even in higher education political and ideological agendas are threatening academic freedom. For example, Guillermo Gonzalez, a talented astronomer at Iowa State University, was recently denied tenure. Gonzalez has published 68 scientific papers, more than three times the number normally expected for tenure in his department. His college textbook on astronomy was published by Cambridge University Press. His work has been featured in top scientific journals, including a cover story in Scientific American.

    But in 2004 Gonzalez co authored a book, "The Privileged Planet: How Our Place in the Cosmos is Designed for Discovery," which made the case for attributing the life-sustaining features of our planet to something other than random chance. This was too much for some colleagues at ISU. "

    All 9 comments are shown.