This story is archived
The Democrats Want Youââ;¬Â¦to shut your traps »
Posted by: bobo-in-texas 2 years, 4 months agoRepublicans have been demanding that the lawsuit protections be added in a conference committee meeting to reconcile the House and Senate versions of what has been dubbed the "9/11 bill." The committee, of which Coleman is a member, adjourned Thursday without taking up the proposal.
Read Full Story at michellemalkin.com »
This Story is Archived and Commenting is Closed
Comments: 179
-
bobo-in-texas
July 22, 2007, 2:55 p.m.The poster pretty much says it all. The Party of retreat and surrender has found yet another way to put our nation's security at risk.
-
scriblerus1
July 22, 2007, 3:27 p.m.Are you kidding Jimmy Bob? I love it when you cons open your mouths or when to write. Let's all stand up and cheer for the First Amendment!
-
catstevensComment has been removed: Retracted by user
-
anioklyComment has been removed: Spammer
-
ranchhandComment has been removed: Retracted by user
-
icono1
July 22, 2007, 9:08 p.m.Ok. Let me see; the US govt want me to watch other people and report suspicious activity. It sounds like to me that I need to be watching the govt closer for nefarious and or suspicious activity.
-
stephen-johnson
July 22, 2007, 9:23 p.m.There are slander and libel laws to handle spurious accusations against innocent parties. But if, as in the case of the Flying Imans, citizens can be sued for common sense concerns about atypical behavior, we might as well roll out the red carpet to Al Qaeda
-
anioklyComment has been removed: Spammer
-
history-ferret
July 22, 2007, 11:50 p.m.Just what are the democrats doing, but wasting money. And now I know that they will have to have a hearing on this, lets say 500 million dollars; no make that 2 million dollars. You know they are famous for sitting on their back sides doing nothing all year long, and wasting money.
How about the side stepping of the LAWS OF OUR LAND; and yet the peoples keep putting them into Government offices.
Well the Republican and democrats are just fronts for the bureaucracy. That word Bureaucracy just means all those little people you can not fire because their jobs are for the life of them. No wonder we in the United States have so much troubles, and so little money. Have a nice day u'all
-
kedirian
July 22, 2007, 11:56 p.m.All these things, Spying on your own citizens thru secret wire-taps, encouraging citizens to spy on each other, excessive claims of Executive Privilege, it all shows a cabal of insecure and easily-frightened "Leaders"!
Of course, the fact that they came to power by less than straightforward means, engineered by a college-dropout Senior Presidential Advisor, who's giving Joseph Goebels a run for his money in Propaganda and deviousness may have something to do with their frightened approach to Life, Politics, and Administering Public Policy...
-
-
Karick
July 23, 2007, 12:52 a.m.Goppy,
Could you like, throw your computer out the window and never touch another one? Pleeeeeease?
The link is reporting a 404 error.
-
-
-
jaern
July 23, 2007, 7:59 a.m.Maybe the US could reopen internment camps, too. Maybe Michelle Malkin could help set them up!
-
Commodore1
July 23, 2007, 8:02 a.m.Oh yes, I love that Michelle Malkin. Teeny, tiny little Oriental woman w/a big roar. Tell them Michelle. I agree w/u 100%.
-
lovermanComment has been removed: Retracted by user
-
cherev
July 23, 2007, 9:04 a.m.Ah, if only we could all find some way to respect each other on this issue.
For example, if I saw Arabs doing something suspicious, like laying explosive charges around the site of the Democratic National Convention right before the convention convened, I guess most of the libs on this site would not want me to report on them.
And I probably would gleefully honor their wishes.
On the other hand, I would hope the Libs would honor the Conservatives wishes and report the Arabs if they were trying to do the same thing to the site of the Republican National Convention. I suspect they would not only NOT respect our wishes, but actually help their Arab buddies.
-
anioklyComment has been removed: Spammer
-
anioklyComment has been removed: Spammer
-
SlapALib
July 23, 2007, 9:32 a.m.I'm torn on this issue.
It was not a democratic vote to throw anybody off the plane, it was a decision made by the airline. Did those in charge hear the reports by some, observe those reported about, and then toss them off the plane? Or was the toss based solely upon hearsay? Seems like the airline is the one liable.
Then again there is such a thing as slander, which is wrong. But how many reports were there total? Again how did the airline deem the reports credible?
-
JohnQPublicComment has been removed: Retracted by user
-
lovermanComment has been removed: Retracted by user
-
ingsocartsem
July 23, 2007, 10:33 a.m.The article could not be opened.
Want to read something about the World Trade Center that is fresh and honest? Even those radical news agencies, the fringe of reportage deliberately never mentioned some of the stuff I am mentioning because it is in their best interests.
So without further ado, read me on netscape.net. It is nothing stuffy like crash mechanics. The news is a lie... If you lost someone in the WTC or have someone in Afghanistan or Iraq, read me on netscape. You owe it to yourself.
-
anioklyComment has been removed: Spammer
The first 153 comments are shown. Show all 179 comments »
Submit a Story
Advertisement
