This story is archived

Hollywood helps 'uncensored' anti-Hillary film »

Posted by: RedRiverJ 2 years, 1 month ago

Hollywood filmmakers normally inclined to support candidates such as Sen. Hillary Clinton are working quietly behind the scenes to put the finishing touches on a documentary alleging the New York Democrat committed felonies to get elected and assisted her husband in defrauding a major donor.

Read Full Story at worldnetdaily.com »
Submitted By:
RedRiverJ

Just an average American. conservative.

Who Also Submitted:

This Story is Archived and Commenting is Closed

Comments: 224
  • Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)RedRiverJ
    RedRiverJ
    Oct. 24, 2007, 11:45 a.m.

    "The producers are essentially liberal Hollywood Democrats who fear exposure and retribution," said Jim Nesfield, director of the Equal Justice Foundation of America, which is sponsoring the hour-long film, "Hillary Uncensored." Could Hollywood be turning their backs on Hillary to save themselves. Interesting.

    • Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)bobo-in-texas
      bobo-in-texas
      Oct. 24, 2007, 12:18 p.m.

      My favorite sign at an anti-Hillary protest.

      Hillary - Not the right man for the job.

      • Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)cherev
        cherev
        Oct. 24, 2007, 1:18 p.m.

        Hillary has a lock on the Dems. She will be their candidate.

        • Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)Commodore1
          Commodore1
          Oct. 24, 2007, 1:24 p.m.

          Even it goes on air the liberals don't care. Hillary could be a convicted murderer and the nazi liberals wouldn't care. It's ok for them to have criminals as their leader. But who knows. Maybe we will get lucky and something positive will happen.

          • Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)abntv
            abntv
            Oct. 24, 2007, 2:22 p.m.

            Now this should be fun

            • Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)UncontrollableScaldingDiarrhea
              UncontrollableScaldingDiarrhea
              Oct. 24, 2007, 2:34 p.m.

              Liberals showing at least some semblance of sanity in one area?

              Is the world ending? I don't know about this, but those Liberals and I do know:

              Hillary Clinton for President - Wrong Person, Wrong Time, Wrong Job

              • Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)stephen-johnson
                stephen-johnson
                Oct. 24, 2007, 3:11 p.m.

                All this talk about whether Hillary is electable or not misses the point - does anyone think that the other Democrats would govern with a different agenda if one of them won the nomination?

                A lot of conservatives are too busy demonizing Hillary to think clearly about the big picture. And in spite of what the pollsters say, if Hillary is the nominee, she can win. It's not a lock, but it's not that much of a stretch. The Republicans can't win just by showing up.

                • Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)bruhaha
                  bruhaha
                  Oct. 24, 2007, 3:30 p.m.

                  Tell me who these supposed liberal Hollywood democrats are and maybe this story will have actual credibility.

                  • Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)abntv
                    abntv
                    Oct. 24, 2007, 4:14 p.m.

                    The story is not about the Hollywood democrates..the story is about the numerous felony crimes committed by Hillary Clinton..great quote from clip, "crimes on tape"

                    • Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)abntv
                      abntv
                      Oct. 24, 2007, 4:31 p.m.

                      It will be interesting to see how the teflon girl comes out of this one..

                      • Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)GLee
                        GLee
                        Oct. 24, 2007, 5:35 p.m.

                        Maybe 'The Hill' isn't as slick as she thinks??

                        • Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)Truzseeker
                          Truzseeker
                          Oct. 24, 2007, 5:41 p.m.

                          Good post RedRiverJ !

                          • Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)MonkeyBiz
                            MonkeyBiz
                            Oct. 24, 2007, 5:52 p.m.

                            Where is the proof of a felony? She is clearly not planning the gala, but thanking them for it. There is nothing that indicates or even hints that she is receiving an illegal campaign donation.

                            This whole story and the web site it comes from is merely a right wing hate hillary fantasy. Who are these mysterious Hollywood moguls? The video is a not so subtle and poorly planned "swift boat" attack on hillary.

                            Where's the beef?

                            • Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)not2needy
                              not2needy
                              Oct. 24, 2007, 6:03 p.m.

                              I'm not a big fan of Hillary Clinton's, but if Hollywood want's to make a documentary to expose her, WHY do they have to do it "quietly"?

                              JUST DO IT! If they don't want her elected they may regret it. Such a documentary could turn around and bite them in the butt!!

                              • Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)endtyranny
                                endtyranny
                                Oct. 24, 2007, 6:27 p.m.

                                Another Clinton Chronicles? These people are truly viscious.

                                • Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)ADAGUY
                                  ADAGUY
                                  Oct. 24, 2007, 6:41 p.m.

                                  "Paul insisted the film is not being "directed by any right-wing group."

                                  yeah, right. I really believe that!

                                  Look, I don't care for her in the first place, and I don't want her elected. But this is just another swift boat stunt by the opposing party! I suspect that only a small fraction of it is true!

                                  • Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)abntv
                                    abntv
                                    Oct. 24, 2007, 6:55 p.m.

                                    So the federal prosecuter is lying??

                                    • Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)abntv
                                      abntv
                                      Oct. 24, 2007, 10:01 p.m.

                                      However I think Billary's thighs are bigger than the Hulks

                                      • Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)abntv
                                        abntv
                                        Oct. 24, 2007, 10:12 p.m.

                                        Ok back on topic before I get banned...

                                        Does anyone have any guesses as to where this might air on television?

                                        • Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)abntv
                                          abntv
                                          Oct. 24, 2007, 10:31 p.m.

                                          Which brings up the question again..who plays Billary? Oh I cant believe I actually typed that...bad Ab no biscuit

                                          • Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)abntv
                                            abntv
                                            Oct. 24, 2007, 11:25 p.m.

                                            I'm going to go eat dinner now...keep up the good work folks

                                            • Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)pismo
                                              pismo
                                              Oct. 25, 2007, 7:44 a.m.

                                              "the Clintons reneged on the deal after the Washington Post published a story about his past felony convictions. The Clinton campaign, he said, then proceeded to cover up his massive contributions and act as if they didn't know him."

                                              All this sounds like to me is the Clinton's found out he was a crook and decided they did not want to be affiliated with Paul anymore and now Paul and some others are seeking revenge. Typical politics.

                                              • Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)jordan11
                                                jordan11
                                                Oct. 25, 2007, 8:34 a.m.

                                                Tell you what. After she's indicted, and convicted, then I'll be interested in this 'story.' You see, I'm just plain burnt out on this kind of stuff. It's not unexpected, of course, but I've already been here, done that, and am over it. (speaking of the witch hunt against the Clinton's in the 1990's that came up with nothing, zero, zilch.) So you'll excuse me....YAWN...while I get the coffee on. Busy day today.

                                                • Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)SAAB7699
                                                  SAAB7699
                                                  Oct. 25, 2007, 8:44 a.m.

                                                  When it comes to politics,there are no party lines.Everyone is

                                                  fair game

                                                  • Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)bitsnpeses
                                                    bitsnpeses
                                                    Oct. 25, 2007, 8:55 a.m.

                                                    It sounds like business as usual and sour grapes to me. People change business partners all the time. Because Clinton was influencial in taking a partner away from Paul and he lost his business made him a very angry person. I can see why he would lie and state untruths about the Clintons. Where is his proof that they knew he was a convicted felon with a record or that they accepted campaign contributions from him? BTW, why would there be anything wrong with accepting campaign conributions from a felon? Our tax money is supporting the biggest crook in the US...George Bush.

                                                    • Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)bushiesRbonkers
                                                      bushiesRbonkers
                                                      Oct. 25, 2007, 9:35 a.m.

                                                      Another article on Hillary, another right-wing hate fest.

                                                      • Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)navalgunner
                                                        navalgunner
                                                        Oct. 25, 2007, 10:02 a.m.

                                                        I just can't believe this anti Hillary story has actualy made it on this left of left site. this is great. But you notice that the libs are still pointing fingers at Bush instead of looking at what the Clinton's have done and are still doing.

                                                        • Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)GrainOfSand
                                                          GrainOfSand
                                                          Oct. 25, 2007, 10:57 a.m.

                                                          The Hillary Clinton Presidency would NOT yield the type of change the American People want. Hillary is corporate to the bone. She could care less about the common Joe and Josephine in America. She cares more about Wal-Mart and Westinghouse instead.

                                                          As long as the MSM touts her as the "front runner" and Hillary makes a boatload of cash from her corporate sponsors the American Sheep will elect her. I strongly doubt a Republican can make it into the White House. The stain Republican Bush will have left will be to great for them to elect another one.

                                                          • Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)hyperbola
                                                            hyperbola
                                                            Oct. 25, 2007, 12:35 p.m.

                                                            This article is a typical psy-ops article full of insinuation with zero facts. The people involved are a bunch of business failures now involved in suing each other about comic books. They try to give themselves credence by listing all the "universities" where it will be shown (by the local GOP club?).

                                                            You have to be deeply into sect mode to give this any credence. But then, there are far too many americans who are gullible enough to fall for the psy-ops. Take some time to educate yourself on how it is done.

                                                            October 22, 2007 Issue

                                                            The American Conservative

                                                            Phantoms Over Syria

                                                            Eveything Israel wants you to know about its secret airstrike

                                                            http://amconmag.com/2007/2007_10_22/article2.html

                                                            • Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)dwemm
                                                              dwemm
                                                              Oct. 25, 2007, 6:30 p.m.

                                                              Much as I liked the previous administration better than the current sinking ship, I really have to admit that Bill and Hillary manage to collect a whole string of well-connected haters who are willing to destroy a lot to get their own back.

                                                              Like the Whitewater investigation--I wonder if the special prosecutors and another $40 million will follow this rabid accusation too?

                                                              The first 223 comments are shown. Show all 224 comments »