This story is archived

The New Land Cruiser - Bigger is Better? »

Posted by: mdvaldosta 2 years, 2 months ago

Archived 92 0 drops

Now 2 inches longer an 1 inch wider, powered by a 381 horsepower 5.7 liter V8 engine making monstor torque... never mind the gas mileage.

mdvaldosta

The submissions, votes, thoughts, and comments do not reflect the opinion of this person. In fact, I don't even know this person. Wait, where ...

This Story is Archived and Commenting is Closed

Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)
pc25
Oct. 25, 2007, 3:50 p.m.
it's time for vehicles like this to go the way of the dinosaur
Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)
architekker
Oct. 25, 2007, 5:23 p.m.
Well well, more gas guzziling vehicles to produce to raise oil demands.
Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)
Harbeas
Oct. 25, 2007, 6:51 p.m.
What a bunch of useless crap on this thing! Why not just drive a tank instead. We are approaching the absurd when it comes to transportation.
Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)
icono1
Oct. 25, 2007, 9:03 p.m.
I'll take an Abrams M1 with cruse control, digital audio with super big bass woffers and surround sound just to keep up with the kids around here.
Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)
Endoscopy
Oct. 25, 2007, 9:40 p.m.
I see some posters here do not understand what a lot of these vehicles are used for. It is the vehicle for people going out in areas where there are no roads. The Land Rover and Hummer are better but costs a lot more.
I'll wait until they redesign it to accept a Bugatti engine. Thats over 1000 hp and will give it some zip.
Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)
HMMace
Oct. 26, 2007, 3:56 a.m.
Remember the old saying--" If you got it--flaunt it"...If you ca afford a 60 thousand dollar car, who cares about the gas???
Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)
BLKEDU
Oct. 26, 2007, 2:19 p.m.
they should call this the FTE(fucq the environment edition)