This story is archived

Romney Shouldn't Equate Mormons, Christians »

Posted by: ZiegfeldGirl 2 years, 1 month ago

Archived 86 0 drops

As Mitt Romney scours the South for endorsements from evangelical leaders, he is getting some unusual advice on how to explain his Mormon faith: Don't try to be one of us. ``I told him, you cannot equate Mormonism with Christianity; you cannot say, `I am a Christian just like you,''' said Representative Bob Inglis.

Read Full Story at bloomberg.com »

Submitted By:

ZiegfeldGirl

"No, we tend to prefer candidates who don't talk about us one way in Scranton and another way in San Francisco." ~Governor Sarah Palin ...

This Story is Archived and Commenting is Closed

Comments: 361

Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)
ZiegfeldGirl
Nov. 5, 2007, 8:58 a.m.
I think this is ridiculous. This is why religion should not be an issue when choosing a leader.
"My God is better than your God", puh-leeze!
catstevensComment has been removed: Retracted by user
catstevensComment has been removed: Retracted by user
FormidableComment has been removed: Hard Banned
FormidableComment has been removed: Hard Banned
FormidableComment has been removed: Hard Banned
FormidableComment has been removed: Hard Banned
FormidableComment has been removed: Hard Banned
Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)
ZiegfeldGirl
Nov. 5, 2007, 10:34 a.m.
One thing that irritates me about Mormons is their baptizing people who are deceased into their religion. Their Genealogy site is great, but when you know the purpose is to track down essentially EVERYONE so they can baptize them Mormon by proxy, it's really creepy.
FormidableComment has been removed: Hard Banned
FormidableComment has been removed: Hard Banned
Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)
puffin
Nov. 5, 2007, 12:14 p.m.
The idiot drove for 12 hours with his dog strapped to the roof of the car. When it crapped itself, he stopped to hose down the carrier & the dog, then got right back on the highway.
Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)
ZiegfeldGirl
Nov. 5, 2007, 1:05 p.m.
"Seeing the inside of the car is full, Romney absentmindedly says to himself, 'Where am I going to put ole Seamus here?' and hearing his name, the dog says, 'Roof, roof,'" said Llope."
Wow. That's pretty bad. Do people generally do that? I've never heard of such a thing. It's a station wagon, they couldn't leave space for the carrier in the back and put more of their crap up on the roof? Or let the dog lay across the laps of some of their boys? Poor Seamus!
Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)
stephen-johnson
Nov. 5, 2007, 1:41 p.m.
These religious tests are getting pretty old. People who impose them deserve what they get politically - which is usually nothing.
ranchhandComment has been removed: Retracted by user
Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)
crespi
Nov. 5, 2007, 2:44 p.m.
You can equate Mormonism with FUNDAMENTALIST Christianity just fine...
Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)
Dionys
Nov. 5, 2007, 3:03 p.m.
I'm sorry but you cannot, if you take even a distant (or especially a close) look at Mormonism and their basic tenets, claim that Mormons are Christians.
Plus you have to wonder about a religious group that *needs* so strongly to claim that they are Christians.
Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)
Bkumm
Nov. 5, 2007, 4:37 p.m.
I love it when this particular piece gets quoted, it shows a complete ignorance of history:
"(( [Revelation 24:28-19] ...If anyone adds anything to them, God will add to him the plagues described in this book. And if anyone takes words away from this book of prophecy, God will take away from him his share in the tree of life and in the holy city, which are described in this book ))"
Revelation was written, probably, in the first century AD. At the time there were hundreds of 'books' in the Bible. The Bible was not canonized until the late fifth century AD at which time many, many books were dropped and some added. In fact, if one were to be completely honest the Bible that we see today did not really come into being until the Council of Trent in 1546. Some denominations of Christianity still consider the "apocryphal" books canon and others do not.
Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)
joeblowe
Nov. 5, 2007, 5:46 p.m.
You know, I'd be tempted to say that any talk of religion should be absolutely BANNED from political speeches and/or party platforms - just on 1st amendment principle - but then we wouldn't be able to find out who among them was REALLY nuts vs those who are just ordinary nuts. Far as I can tell, Mormons are REALLY nuts. It's bad enough to have an invisible friend, but to rely on a man who needed medication (Smith, that is) in the best case or was a really foul con-man in the worst case, for their spiritual guidance - wow, that's going some distance from the SANITY marker. Sure, everyone needs a hobby, but much like pedophilia, Mormonism should be kept very much to yourself if you don't want people to look at you funny. Oh - not to mention that Mormons don't seem to MIND pedophilia in some cases...
Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)
vettenut
Nov. 6, 2007, 1:08 p.m.
Hey bkumm (and others truly interested in this topic):
It is no more possible to define what is/is not a "CHRISTIAN" religion in just 2 brief sentences than to describe how a jet airliner works in just 2 brief sentences...
BUT, I have composed my definition of a "CHRISTIAN" religion, in the alloted space of less than 3 Propeller posts.
And here it is, in the following posts:
Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)
vettenut
Nov. 6, 2007, 1:18 p.m.
My above posts are a brief definition. The definition is not meant to be defensible in each detail, because it is an abridged definition, not a comprehensive one, because of format limitations.
But I trust it enumerates the common ground that all "Christians" can affirm.
May the Light of God's Truth shine forever!!!
AMEN!!!
Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)
greenmac
Nov. 9, 2007, 12:17 a.m.
WOW...this is a rough crowd in here tonight! LOL
Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)
howardbenton
Feb. 15, 2008, 8:34 a.m.
An HTML attachment was scrubbed. http://mp3dabest.com/pag/tag_t/