This story is archived

How Britain became party to a crime that may have killed a million people »

Archived 27 0 drops

Let me dwell for a moment on what Guthrie said, for he appears to advocate that we retain the right to commit war crimes.

berkeley

If tyranny and oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. Of all the enemies to public ...

This Story is Archived and Commenting is Closed

Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)
berkeley
Jan. 2, 2008, 2:13 a.m.
the war powers act was a brave experiment that britain did not copy. but like any law, it requires enforcement, which the current congress is entirely incapable of doing.
Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)
ekklesiawarrior
Jan. 2, 2008, 2:53 a.m.
Britain in many respects is the same as in the 1600's.
WHY do you think young America, declared Independence in 1776, started the Revolutionary War and then a second War, the WAR of 1812?
Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)
blinkers
Jan. 2, 2008, 5:36 a.m.
An interesting piece, providing useful insights on the British political system.
In the light of what was said, I find it odd that the British call their head of state a "Constitutional monarch".