« Back to story "State of the Union reactions"

Story Comments

Posted by: Blackacereturn 1 year, 9 months ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

  • Neutral
    Blackacereturn1 year, 9 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    All this does is serving as evidence that the RIGHT of this nation has lost their collective minds. We are staving off a depression and recession but we shouldn't increase the taxes, are you kidding me?

    Tell me please where will the money come from, are we going to borrow more from China?

    I am so glad this is the last time I will have to endure this idiot, and I hope that our nation comes to their senses and make it the last time we have to endure the republican congress person that aided and abided Bush in this destruction of our nation.

    They don't get it, they were awful, terrible, the worse ever, and they were barley better than a dictator in a third world country. Hugo Chavez out governed these idiots...Look you know things are bad when you have to ask if Rove stills works for the president, he has been in hiding!

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply

    5 Replies

    loading loading ...
    • Neutral
      amazed1 year, 9 months ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      Basic economics from Adam Smith to present day economists all agree that the last thing you do during a recession is raise taxes. In fact, most of them advocated deficit spending and reducing taxes to stimulate the economy.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply

      4 Replies

      loading loading ...
      • Neutral
        cosmogenium1 year, 9 months ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        We wouldn't be in a recession if your party hadn't caused it by borrowing like crazy in the first place.

        And I remember a full-page add in the NYT taken out by 12 nobel-laureate economists saying that the Bush tax-cuts were the wrong thing to do.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        loading loading ...
        • Neutral
          StarLord1 year, 9 months ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          Normally, a tax-cut is not a bad thing. However, there are three reasons for this recession (that may exist - quarterly figures aren't out yet for successive quarters of recession):

          1. Injudicious tax cuts. Fiscal policy is a good lever to use to prevent an overheated (and inflationary) economy, and thus as a recession preventative. Bush's tax cuts abrogated this vital economic function of the government.

          2. Insufficient regulation. The sub-prime crisis (credit crisis) has been caused by lack of regulation on lending bodies, which has allowed them to greedily lend sums of money which could not be repaid by the borrowers. The borrowers are hardly blameless, but it is easier to regulate corporations than individuals. Also, a little regulation regarding wages and working conditions wouldn't go astray.

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
          Reply

          1 Reply

          loading loading ...
          • Neutral
            StarLord1 year, 9 months ago

            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

            3. "Trickle-down" economics doesn't work. Any healthy economy is fueled by healthy consumption patterns at the lower end of the spectrum (i.e, the lower-paid people). Giving the rich money simply ensures that they will invest it overseas, where it can't be taxed. This fails to benefit the economy. Perhaps, in the days prior to globalisation taking hold, the theory might have worked. But not now. Allowing employers to squeeze every last penny out of the working poor to pay bigger dividends to the rich doesn't help the fabric of your economy. Too many people have forgotten that economics is a cross between commerce and social science. The economy is not, in the final analysis, a set of abstact numbers - it is a living, breathing entity.

            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 7) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
            Reply
            loading loading ...
          • Neutral
            Blackacereturn1 year, 9 months ago

            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

            Look, Clinton fixed it and he did so by raising taxes. Here is where clinton went in the correct direction he also cut spending...Under clinton we had the lease amount of money ever spent on defence by a present day president. Before you say it, we were still the strongest army in the world,

            it was during this time the Europeans estimate that if all of europe came up against the US they would lose in an all out war. And Clinton spent 50 billion a year on the armforces.

            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
            Reply
            loading loading ...

        Post Reply

        You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.

        People Who Liked This Comment (18)

        People Who Didn't Like This Comment (0)

        No one voted this comment negatively.

        Submit a Story

        Advertisement

        Story Tags ?

        Hey! If you Sign In, you can add tags to this story!

        Also Dropping This Article

        No one has dropped this story.

        Groups Watching This

        No groups are watching this story. Why not share it with your groups?

        Also Submitted By

        No one else has submitted this story.