This story is archived
Endin' the Feudin' Between Science and Religion »
Posted by: Spadecaller 1 year, 10 months ago"Those who posit that religion and science are inherently in conflict are two sides of the same counter productive framing of the argument. Those who support religious pluralism, sound science, and science education are natural allies against religious supremacy, Christian nationalism, and crackpot science of the religious right."
Read Full Story at talk2action.org:80 »
Submitted By:
Spadecaller
Welcome to my profile. About me: I'm an artist of several kinds; from bull to painting. I don't spare too many words. Most ...
This Story is Archived and Commenting is Closed
Comments: 251
-
Spadecaller
Feb. 9, 2008, 9:18 a.m.In American politics, clergy and politicians have joined in an unholy marriage, and scientists have been given a seat in the back of the bus.
James Dobson and the other kooks like him must be exposed for what they are: religious fanatics who believe it is their holy mission to dominate the rest of us.
-
daducha
Feb. 9, 2008, 9:41 a.m.Thanks for sharing. These are good developments. But personally, science does not come in conflict with my faith in my God. I do not go on debates nor heated discussions about why I believe in God and about my faith, I keep it to myself and I do not disagree with other people who have different views. But if they end up this conflict between science and religion, then good.
-
walden3
Feb. 9, 2008, 9:44 a.m.I give the United Church of Christ credit. They welcome all with open arms.
-
Spadecaller
Feb. 9, 2008, 9:56 a.m.Two days ago, Dobson sent out 100,000 emails to his supporters about his endorsement of Huckabee. Unfortunatley, Dobson's views on pluralism, Christian nationalism, gays, and science do not leave much room for tolerance.
-
rdy2rckComment has been removed: Hard Banned
-
texangelwings
Feb. 9, 2008, 10:23 a.m.Faith can not be force fed to another human being. Science is still trying to understand God's creations. Humankind is always growing and learning something new!
We are all created by God and we are His children! I think that science and religion should work hand in hand to make life better for us all!
Thanks Spadecaller, good article!
-
AtheismIsRealityComment has been removed: Retracted by user
-
not2needy
Feb. 9, 2008, 11:17 a.m.Science is amazing, i have always been intrigued with it.
That said, science has never interfered with my faith and belief in God.
It's all about perspectives.
Thanks spade.
-
Sock_Puppet
Feb. 9, 2008, 11:18 a.m.I don't think the two are mutually exclusive, and in some ways one supports the other. But any religion that seeks to dominate and control the world is just wrong.
-
ameliog
Feb. 9, 2008, 11:36 a.m.We are often trapped by the frame that we're told to exist within. If science and religion are two separate things, then they must be in opposition. I reject that frame. If both the spiritual and physical realities exist, then they should ultimately harmonize.
Obviously, people who don't believe in a spiritual element will sit firmly on science's side because there is nothing else to them that is believable. They aren't necessarily antagonistic toward the spiritual belief so much as they see it as an equation that doesn't add up, like 1 plus 1 equals 7, so it's dismissed without prejudice.
-
Spadecaller
Feb. 9, 2008, 12:06 p.m.About Christian nationalism according to the author of the article:
"But the Christian nationalist narrative has a fatal flaw: it is based on revisionist history that does not stand up under scrutiny. The bad news is that to true believers, it does not have to stand up to the facts of history to be a powerful and animating part of the once and future Christian nation. Indeed, through a growing cottage industry of Christian revisionist books and lectures now dominating the curricula of home schools and many private Christian academies, Christian nationalism becomes a central feature of the political identity of children growing up in the movement. The contest for control of the narrative of American history is well underway."
-
Dicax_Maximus
Feb. 9, 2008, 12:41 p.m.As an agnostic, even I find it incredible that so many "religious" people have a problem with science...
To me, it's very simple (taking the christian faith as an example). "God" created the earth in 6 Days.... Someone want to state (and either prove or disprove) that "His Day" didn't equal 800 million years (give or take a few), which would roughly match with science ??
Having never spoken to the Deity myself, I'll accept that his version of "Day" versus ours may just differ......
Why is this so hard for some to comprehend ???
-
icono1
Feb. 9, 2008, 12:59 p.m.Fundamentalist any-religion is usually an anti intellectual growth crowd.
Some of the Christian fundies I have had the great displeasure to talk to because of my degrees in Mathematics and Physics are always telling me that Science is the work of Satan because it undermines the 'intuitive sense' (ie fundie definition of God), that God wanted man to have of God.
(another case of mere humans being able to devine the mind of the Devine and therefore "speak for God" which I think is dangerous buiness because God may not care for that at all.)
So I say !!!!OK.
But: (I usually reply)IMHO;
That scientist are, by my understanding of God's definition not theirs, part of God's creation and that a person who studies science is only studying what God initially created in the first place to be discovered by his creation Man and studied by his creation Man and or applied by God's creation Man.
cont.
-
Rinty
Feb. 9, 2008, 1:09 p.m.Religion:
A powerful healing force. In a world torn apart by religion.
It's up too us as individuals, no matter what your religious background and beliefs are to be tolerant and respectful of one another.
Personally, I grew up in a family divided by religious beliefs. My mother was an Irish Catholic and my father was Scots Presbyterian, it was so bad back then they had too elope, and we never had both sets of Grandparents in our home at the same time. Yet they loved us unconditionally.
My children are being taught 'day to day' what religion they choose, if any, is their choice. They are also being taught that you don't need to walk into a building and recite verse in order to be a good person and make a difference in their world.
-
rdy2rckComment has been removed: Hard Banned
-
Spadecaller
Feb. 9, 2008, 1:14 p.m.Rinty
Thanks for sharing that. I always find that there is nothing more revealing and instructive than one's personal experiences.
-
Edmar14
Feb. 9, 2008, 2:01 p.m.I am constantly asked the question by my students if science and religion are in opposition to each other. As a professor in modern world history, western civilization has gone through it's dark period, reformation and today we are in a technological period unprecedented in history. My answer to this question is always the same- science is not in opposition to religious belief or vice versa. The bible tells us that God created the universe, the planets and the earth in particular. It doesn't however tell us how these feats were accomplished. Science attempts to continue where religion leaves off. Whether the universe was created by a big bang does not create a rift in religious belief. The big bang may be what God used to create the universe. Religion teaches us that the earth was created in 6 days but the bible never explains how long a day was. Time of creation was in the hands of the almighty not necessarily in the hands of a 24 hour a day clock.
-
flyonthewallzz
Feb. 9, 2008, 3:20 p.m.In an effort to disguise my ignorance, I just did a bunch of skim reading about some of the early scientific thinkers who embraced the metaphysical (speculation upon questions that are unanswerable to scientific observation, analysis, or experiment.)
I failed at finding a place or time when the schism appeared but there where quite a few really smart folks that believed their was more than one type of knowledge and actively pursued both at the same time, Here are some of them (please forgive pasties):
Pythagoris:
Pythagoreanism is a term used for the esoteric and metaphysical beliefs held by Pythagoras and his followers, the Pythagoreans, who were much influenced by mathematics and probably a main inspirational source for Plato and Platonism.
Aristotle:
Aristotle believed that ethical knowledge is not precise knowledge, like logic and mathematics, but general knowledge like knowledge of nutrition and exercise. Also, as it is a practical discipline rather than a theoretical one.
-
Radiofreeeuropa
Feb. 9, 2008, 3:48 p.m.Fly,
A more apt investigation might be when did religion part from the "mystical" (St. Francis, etc.) and become dogmatic, concrete and political? Religion is man's early attempts to comprehend the universe, they got some of it right and they got much of it wrong. For modern man to accept it as fact is counterproductive. To dismiss it entirely is also counter productive. Remember that Bacon for instance, would have to temper his words to avoid jail, excommunication, or torture by the "political" church of the day.
-
flyonthewallzz
Feb. 9, 2008, 3:54 p.m.I thought this described the value of combining the physical with the metaphysical.
I do not know of an instrument that can measure how "pleasing" something is.
-
annoDomini
Feb. 9, 2008, 4:54 p.m.Science enlightens our minds and enlarges our imaginations. Because of science, we know some things about our universe. We know that we are the inhabitants of an unremarkable planet, circling an unremarkable star in a universe of at least 10,000,000... stars. We believe the universe was born 15,000,000,000 years ago in a huge explosion. Science tells us what makes the stars shine, why water is wet, and how genetic information is conveyed from one generation to the next.
Religion enlightens our minds and enlarges our imaginations. Because of religion, we know something about the being that created the universe. We know that God intended us to be inhabitants of the planet. Religion tells us what, why, and how to do good and to be good.
-
canadianrancher57
Feb. 9, 2008, 4:57 p.m.I have often wondered when religion and science first came to oppose each other. I feel it came even before there was any recognize science. If you look at some of the earlier types of religion they had sacrifices, they knew if they took a persons blood the person died so blood was the esence of life, but if you took away a persons ability to breathe the person died so you had the breath of life, different ideas over time have been used by religion to try and explain the source of life and I feel that none have been successful, but also science has not been able to explain the source of life. After this little rant I have just one thing that I wish someone could explain, Why do we all have different fingerprints, to me they are a form of identification but why?
-
annoDomini
Feb. 9, 2008, 5:02 p.m.Some may think that science in religion are different because science is based on facts and religion is based on opinion, but I believe that conclusion is a fundamental mistake.
Those of us who are true scientists recognize that science is about INTERPRETED facts. We infer from what we see and we postulate theoretical explanations. It may be difficult for non-scientists to really appreciate this because they see the amazing technological gadgets we have created and, because they cannot understand the technology, are simply amazed. The problem really is that in order to make any interpretation of the data, one has to know a lot of science already. Almost all science today is done from a chosen point of view that is based on what we think we know from past science. This isn't to say that science is not about facts, only that it is also about what we already believe.
-
Francisca
Feb. 9, 2008, 5:03 p.m.Thanks for this story Spadecaller! I think the both aren't incompatible. Human needs the both anyway!(with moderation)As I am Cartesian I only would say...what is the most dangerous: an insane scientist? Or a Fundamentalist-heretic?We can't live without faith and we can't live without progress!! It's up to us to find the "right"balance.
-
annoDomini
Feb. 9, 2008, 5:13 p.m.Those of us who are true believers recognize that religion is not ONLY about faith. Our beliefs are motivated by seeking to understand real facts in our universe, and that includes more than just viewing the planets and stars. It includes trying to understand something about the miracles described in the Torah, how it is that so many could have claimed that Yeshua was raised from dead, or the incredible potency of the message Mohammed delivered.
Science and religion are intellectual cousins, both searching to explain what we experience and what motivates the beliefs that we know in ourselves and in others. Indeed, much of the intellectual scrutiny in history has been supported by the church. Neither can claim absolute knowledge because each bases its conclusions on a combination of interpretation and experience; therefore, both must be open to correction when it is warranted.
The first 169 comments are shown. Show all 251 comments »
Submit a Story
Advertisement
