Story Comments

Posted by: Endoscopy 1 year, 9 months ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

Neutral
Endoscopy1 year, 9 months ago

This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

Repetition of what is false does not make it true. The evidence that "proves" evolution also "proves" God. The definitive proof of a species gradually transforming into another is not in the fossil record. That is the only acceptable proof required by the scientific process. The other problem is it must be reproducible. Can't happen in our lifetime.

(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
Reply
2 Replies

loading ...
- lovermanComment removed: Retracted by user1 Reply
  - Neutral
    Radiofreeeuropa1 year, 9 months ago
    
    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
    
    It does come down to that. The infallibility of the bible. That is what is behind the rejection of evolution, do a search on the internet, there are many sites claiming evolution is false, they are all religious sites.
    Yet faith in the bible is faith in it's editors who were not Gods, it is faith in the interpreters who were men not gods. To believe these men were infallible is pretty hard to swallow. Hopefully the general ideas are correct but word for word literally? What are the chances?
    
    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply
    0 Replies
    
    loading ...