Sleaze charge: 'I took drugs, had homo sex with Obama' »
Posted By RedRiverJ 1 year, 8 months ago in NewsWASHINGTON ââ;¬" The electrifying presidential campaign of Barack Obama faces a new challenge ââ;¬" a Minnesota man who claims he took cocaine in 1999 with the then-Illinois legislator and participated in homosexual acts with him. When his story was ignored by the news media, Larry
Read Full Story at worldnetdaily.com »
703 Views Share Story 122 Comments Report
Other Related Articles:
Why not submit a story?
RSS Join the Discussion
+ Add CommentShowing 632 of 836 Comments (view all)
-
Neutral
RedRiverJ1 year, 8 months ago
-
MichaelRhodenteComment removed: Retracted by user175 Replies
-
Neutral
CactusAnnie1 year, 8 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
The court papers are official. I tend to believe him, but do wonder if there is Clinton involvement in bringing him forward, you know how they do tend to attack with things that are their own foibles.
Just curious, where has James Carville been lately?
Reply -
birddog54Comment removed: Abusive57 Replies
-
Neutral
Klarissa1 year, 8 months ago
-
-
Neutral
slate1 year, 8 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I'll say again that I don't Believe this for a second,,,, you libs don't make false claims against me about me believing this and being a Slug,,,, the fact is the video is out there,,, I want to know who put it out,,, was it an insurance policy for someone that could see the future possible need for it?
Once again, find out the person or group that stands to gain the most from these sorts of scurrilous things and you will likely find the culprit(s) behind it. Then you will have the actual source for your scorn, instead of a person on a blog site that has many threads in the past resplendent with scandalous things and accusations.
Reply -
-
Neutral
VeteranGirl1 year, 8 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Wby am I not surprised anymore? This video reminded me of that male prostitute that came forward about that Evangelist. Everyone wanted to kill the messenger. No way! The Evangelist is married with children!
Not only was said Evangilist having sex with the male prostitute, he was also getting high on meth.
So is it possible that Mr. Obama received ******from a gay unknown man? Is it possible that Mr. Obama, who has conressed to past drug use, was smoking crack as late as 1999?
One of the things I learned about the Airport Bathroom Sex with a politician story -- it doesn't mean a man is gay. It may mean he is a sex addict and will take sex from wherever he can get it.
Which is it for Mr. Obama? Or will he be allowed to not answer this question as he has not fully answered all the others?
Reply -
-
-
ranchhandComment removed: Retracted by user17 Replies
-
Neutral
stephen-johnson1 year, 8 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
The server to the World Net Daily is down.
No matter. The story looks bogus, just like the one claiming that Obama is a stealth Muslim.
You would think that a senator who has a 4 (out of 100) rating from the American Conservative Union has enough legitimate issues that can be brought up. Trafficing in sleaze will backfire big time on whoever is dumb enough to try it.
Reply-
-
AlphaGnosisComment removed: Hard Banned1 Reply
-
-
-
Neutral
ADAGUY1 year, 8 months ago
-
-
Neutral
Nixie1 year, 8 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
And yet she thinks it's a given.
I'd tend to believe this was a Clinton set-up, a Hill/Billy collaboration. Just look at the ingredients:
1. BJ reference (Bill's idea)
2. Sleazy motel room (Bill's idea)
3. The Red Shirt (Hillary's idea, remember the Red Tie? Psychology!)
Republicans won't care about this stuff, we aren't voting for him anyway. So the target audience is Democrats, and the only person who benefits right now if Obama looks bad, is Hillary.
Reply -
-
-
Neutral
david_nwpa1 year, 8 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I was led to believe that the media has a liberal bias, but after reviewing this article and others here at Propeller, I know for sure that the media is clearly biased towards conservatives and has been for years. Faux news is neither fair nor balanced. Furthermore, this site is little more than tabloid junk.
Reply-
Neutral
stephen-johnson1 year, 8 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
"I was led to believe that the media has a liberal bias, but after reviewing this article and others here at Propeller, I know for sure that the media is clearly biased towards conservatives and has been for years"
World Net Daily is a mainstream media site? Does Dan Rather work there?
Reply -
-
-
AlphaGnosisComment removed: Hard Banned4 Replies
-
Neutral
zaph221 year, 8 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I remember seeing this same story, and the video, about a month or so ago, I think someone else had posted it here under a much different title, but no matter, I do remember seeing it, and I think the same thing now that I thought then... I wonder how much the Clintons had to pay this guy to make these claims. And Red, the only reason I won't sink a story like this is because it was posted by you, a friend, but personally, I don't care for stories like this, that are no more than attack ads thinly disguised as "news" stories. And I don't care if this type of story is about a Dem or a Rep, they are just bad, IMHO.
Reply -
-
-
Neutral
Beau78901 year, 8 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
There's much here to doubt the credibility of the story.
There's no link to the YouTube video in the story so we can watch the accuser's delivery and manner.
If you go to the YouTube video (find it yourself--I'm not in the habit of propagating such trash), you'll find the accuser gives no specifics about the "upscale lounge" in which he was supposed to have met Barack, nor about the hotel in Gurnee (of all places for someone who goes to an upscale lounge to wind up). He could have named the locations.
He repeats twice that Obama was a state representative at the time of the alleged incident. He wasn't--he was a state Senator.
The guy doesn't look likely to be nightclubbing in Chicago in a limo, either, as he states.
Reply-
Neutral
Nixie1 year, 8 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sVeFVtcdSYY
Reply -
-
AlphaGnosisComment removed: Hard Banned4 Replies
-
-
Neutral
jdhatl1 year, 8 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
that dude does not have a limo. Just your garden variety attention-seeker. I could care less about Obama's sex or drug experiences. There are real issues afoot, this is utterly idiotic. It is only going to affect stupid homophobic paranoid gullible lazy thinkers. And those people probably are not voting for Obama anyway.
Reply
-
-
Neutral
slate1 year, 8 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I was talking to my buds last night during rehearsal and said that if Hillary had something like this on Obama that she'd have to put it out fast enough to work it's magic before the Texas and Ohio Primaries. AG it looks like Texas will actually have a say about the outcome after all,,,, very cool stuff.
I'm gonna take this 'claim' with a grain of salt, even if it's true I'd find it quite distasteful if the Hillary camp put this outâ;¦. Disappointing but far from surprising,,, the Hillary Camp must be getting desperate,,,,
I'm not going to watch the vid,,,, don't want to give it more 'hits',, I guess I'll figure out what it says from you folks.
Reply-
Neutral
IcCaRus1 year, 8 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
its pretty sleazy, and its more of a Rovian tactic. it smears obama, and is having the desired effect as all your con friends are blaming it on clinton.
slate, i congratulate you for being the lone conservative voice of reason on this thread.
Reply
-
-
Neutral
jdhatl1 year, 8 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Just for the record, a polygraph test is utterly useless. From wikipedia:
"There is little scientific evidence to support the reliability of polygraphs. Despite claims of 90% - 95% reliability, critics charge that rather than a "test", the method amounts to an inherently unstandardizable interrogation technique whose accuracy cannot be established. A 1997 survey of 421 psychologists estimated the test's average accuracy at about 61%, a little better than chance."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polygraph_test
Reply-
Neutral
Nixie1 year, 8 months ago
-
-
-
-
-
Neutral
hdthehn1 year, 8 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Reminds me of the Saturday Night Live skit with Jane Curtain on a panel of political hacks saying she snorted coke with Hamilton Jordan (Carter admin) then all the other panelists in turn made the same claim. Then Jane claims to have had sex with him. Then all the female panelists make the same claim and when the next panel member, Garrett Morris, is up he too makes the same claim. Hilarious for sure.
The precedent was set during the Clinton Administration and Larry Sinclair will need to produce his dress stained with Obamas DNA to prove it. Or will we find recent transfers of cash from Larry Craig or Mark Foley into Sinclair's account.
And where was Hillary during the alleged escapade? Where was Bill? Where was McCain and Mike?
Reply-
Neutral
Nixie1 year, 8 months ago
-
-
Neutral
jdhatl1 year, 8 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Oh yeah, people are dying daily. Who cares about this guy's youtube video. Anyone can post anything they want there and that's not proof of anything. That's just some guy making accusations, in a most pathetic manner. I don't care if he did those things in the first place. This is extreme desperation.
Reply-
-
Neutral
slate1 year, 8 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
(((I don't care if he did those things in the first place. This is extreme desperation.))))
You don't care ? Is that because,,
1. He never has been hypocritical about gays, like Wide Stance Craig?
2. He belongs to the Democrat Party?
3. Some other reason?
Reply
-
-
-
Neutral
IcCaRus1 year, 8 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
AllSpinAllTheTimeDave-
thats because its total BS. and if youre dumb enough to believe it, well youre DUMB enough to believe it. that or desperate because you have FINALLY realized that the GOP is gonna get its @ss handed to it come November.
Reply
-
-
-
AlphaGnosisComment removed: Hard Banned5 Replies
-
-
-
-
-
-
Neutral
RedRiverJ1 year, 8 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Yes she did.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2007/...
Reply
-
-
-
ranchhandComment removed: Retracted by user
-
-
-
JoseMadreComment removed: Hard Banned
-
Neutral
Hereigo1 year, 8 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Oh c'mon, how do we know this guy is telling the truth? How can he prove it? A polygraph test? Don't let me laugh! Or does he just want to get famous, or get money out of this?
I don't say this is a lye but I just don't believe everything what people and media say!
Reply-
Neutral
RedRiverJ1 year, 8 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Hereigo, good point. Same here, I don't believe it or disbelieve it but I do want the information so I can make up my own mind. I don't trust Brian Williams and NBC to do that for me.
http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/matthew-sheffi...
Reply
-
-
-
Add a Comment
Sign In With Your Propeller Account
Please keep your comments relevant to this story.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.