This story is archived

Science debunks biofuel myth »

Posted by: AnteUp 1 year, 10 months ago

Archived 34 0 drops

Cornell University's College of Agriculture and Life Sciences professor, David Pimentel explains why it won't solve the problem. Why haven't we heard that biofuels will be bad for us - the earth AND they are going to cost WAY too much?

Read Full Story at thetimes-tribune.com »

Submitted By:

AnteUp

Never shy about putting in my two-cent's worth.
A local reporter was scouring the neighborhood for the local's opinion
on an issue. I ...

This Story is Archived and Commenting is Closed

Comments: 17

Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)
AnteUp
Feb. 24, 2008, 2:42 p.m.
Why are Democrats and Republicans alike,talking about biofuels as if they were going to solve our energy/environmental problems?
If this article is accurate, it will increase our energy costs - damage the land, AND further pollute our waterways.
Someone with more science savvy than me - What's up?
Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)
berkeley
Feb. 24, 2008, 3:22 p.m.
biofuels have become simply another corporate money grab.
george monbiot and others have covered this for some time.
http://www.monbiot.com/archives/2005/12/06/wors...
Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)
Shadowolf
Feb. 24, 2008, 5:50 p.m.
I like mushrooms;(I am after all,Bohemian!!!) but I'm not ready to become one!!!
Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)
Shadowolf
Feb. 24, 2008, 7:38 p.m.
...I produce my own gas...just enough to get my bike up these hills...
Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)
tehranchik
Feb. 24, 2008, 10:58 p.m.
This is just another faulty alternative like the lightbulbs and coal.
Agribusiness is not an industry to support.
Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)
ETproductions
Feb. 25, 2008, 1:46 a.m.
It's good to ask questions, but this article overstates many of the negatives and ignores flaws with business as usual. Yes, it takes a lot of energy to produce a gallon of biofuel, but it also takes a lot to produce a gallon of gasoline. Gasoline is actually a net energy negative. It takes more energy to produce and deliver a gallon of gas here than there is in it.
Corn is a poor crop to use for biofuel. This is one place where the article is spot on. The US agribusiness sold us a bill of goods because they were already set up to produce corn. But sugar cane and switchgrass yield more energy and work better to establish a closed loop system running off its own materials for energy input and for compost.
Brazil certainly proves that biofuel can be a small part of a comprehensive green energy answer. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biofuel_in_Brazil
JohnQPublicComment has been removed: Retracted by user
Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)
bluetexasvalley
Feb. 26, 2008, 10:20 p.m.
Guess I'll stick with my Prius until it all gets sorted out. ;-)