Cheney's subpoenaed e-mails missing - Capitol Hill- msnbc.com »

Posted By engineer 1 year, 8 months ago in News

Even though White House computer technicians hunted high and low, an entire week's worth of e-mail from Cheney's office was missing. The week was Sept. 30, 2003, to Oct. 6, 2003, the opening days of the Justice Department's probe into whether anyone at the White House leaked the identity of CIA operative Valerie Plame.

Read Full Story at msnbc.msn.com »

61 Views Share Story 3 Comments Report

Submitted By:
engineer

Hi

My background is Biomedical engineering with an MBA As you know from all my comments where I almost stand politically. I have loads of ...

Who Also Submitted:
Other Related Articles:

Why not submit a story?

RSS Join the Discussion

+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 4 (view all)
- Display
  • Neutral
    engineer1 year, 8 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    When Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald wanted to find out what was going on inside Vice President Dick Cheney's office, the prosecutor in the CIA leak probe made a logical move. He dropped a grand jury subpoena on the White House for all the relevant e-mail.

    One problem: Even though White House computer technicians hunted high and low, an entire week's worth of e-mail from Cheney's office was missing. The week was Sept. 30, 2003, to Oct. 6, 2003, the opening days of the Justice Department's probe into whether anyone at the White House leaked the identity of CIA operative Valerie Plame.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    1 Reply

    loading loading ...
  • Neutral
    bill29361 year, 8 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    They could be next to the 'Rose Law Firm' billing records. LOL

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply
    loading loading ...
    • Neutral
      dandt16121 year, 8 months ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      Surprised? Heck NO!!!!!!

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply
      loading loading ...
      View All 4 Comments

      Add a Comment

      Sign In With Your Propeller Account

      Forgot your password?

      Please keep your comments relevant to this story.

      To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.

      More News

      Submit a Story

      Advertisement

      Story Tags ?

      Hey! If you Sign In, you can add tags to this story!

      Also Dropping This Article

      No one has dropped this story.

      Groups Watching This

      No groups are watching this story. Why not share it with your groups?

      Also Submitted By

      No one else has submitted this story.