A sad, sad story: Firing a Nonviolent Quaker »

Posted By populist 1 year, 8 months ago in News

It's a sad day when Americans start viewing non-violence as incompatible with the U.S. Constitution.

Read Full Story at people.ronpaul2008.com »

107 Views Share Story 3 Comments Report

Submitted By:
populist

The essays we offer are unapologetically presented for you to read & analyze. Many are offered as a similar view to ours & others simply to invite ...

Who Also Submitted:
Other Related Articles:

Why not submit a story?

RSS Join the Discussion

+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 3 (view all)
- Display
  • Neutral
    BoxMonkey1 year, 8 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    As an American that realizes people have fought and died for this womans' rights , I say this is too bad for this teacher . I would also say you cannot just cross out and change wording to fit your own beliefs in a Public job such as hers'. I read a few of the comments on the web site and that guy Brad makes a valid point - Pay your taxes or get fined .

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply
    loading loading ...
    • Neutral
      Harbeas1 year, 8 months ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      When she changed the oath 15 years ago she should have not been hired. By accepting the changes previously this situation is going to be very sticky. We however, cannot allow any one to change a law, an oath or anything of that nature to fit their own agenda. Otherwise these things would be rendered useless.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply
      loading loading ...
      • Neutral
        chevydog1 year, 8 months ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        Tend to agree that one just can't change wordings on things. However, conscienscious (sp?) objectors who can demonstrate such are not required to fill positions that would require the use of force. I can certainly comprehend that a bureaucrat who is a stickler for regs would object to hiring a person who changes wording. However, legitimate and continually expressed religious belief might even take precedence over this.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
        Reply
        loading loading ...
        View All 3 Comments

        Add a Comment

        Sign In With Your Propeller Account

        Forgot your password?

        Please keep your comments relevant to this story.

        To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.

        More News

        Submit a Story

        Advertisement

        Story Tags ?

        Hey! If you Sign In, you can add tags to this story!

        Also Dropping This Article

        No one has dropped this story.

        Groups Watching This

        No groups are watching this story. Why not share it with your groups?

        Also Submitted By

        No one else has submitted this story.