Republican McCain trails Clinton and Obama: poll »
Posted By TechnologyExpert 1 year, 4 months ago in NewsPresumptive Republican presidential nominee John McCain trails Democrats Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama in hypothetical matchups, according to a Washington Post-ABC News poll released on Wednesday.
Read Full Story at rawstory.com »
169 Views Share Story 33 Comments Report
Submitted By:
I am Editor-in-Chief at Alice Hill's RealTechNews (http://www.realtechnews.com). I also have my own blog (Tech-Ex) at http://TechnologyExpert.Blogspot.com. Finally ...
Who Also Submitted:
Other Related Articles:
Why not submit a story?
RSS Join the Discussion
+ Add CommentShowing 94 of 96 Comments (view all)
-
anioklyComment removed: User banned.42 Replies
-

EsaEngr1 year, 4 months ago
Polls can be manipulated to provide whatever outcome is desired.
"McCain, endorsed by U.S. President George W. Bush, fares poorly against Clinton and Obama among Americans who disapprove of the president and Americans opposing the war, The Washington Post said." That line says it all. So many Americans have an outright hatred of G.W.Bush and that fact alone appears to be driving their decisions.
The Dem's. talk of "change"...but really do not explain exactly what that means... One is left to draw their own conclusions on that. I hope the definition comes soon from both Clinton and Obama.
Reply-

IcCaRus1 year, 4 months ago
what is "change"?
glad you asked that. the majority of americans believe that Duh-bya is a failure of epic proportions as President. (approval ratings that are below 20%) the republican candidate for the Presidency, John McCain, offers little more than 4 more years of the same. NO THANK YOU!
what change is is simple: its a president that realizes Bush has done major damage to our country and will work to undo it, who puts americanS before corporate masters. either candidate, on their worst day, will be better for america than more of the same.
also, for republicans mocking "change" and asking what "change" means. dont forget, the Duh-cider ran on "change", and yall were thrilled to vote for the Idiot, TWICE, without ever asking what "change" meant.
we understand, change, to you, meant NOT Clinton. change, to us, means NOT Duh-bya or a copycat, which is all McCains offering.
Reply -

Justice4All1 year, 4 months ago
McCain did not seem so bad. But by accepting the endorsement of Bush I have doubts about him. If he were smart he would have refused the endorsement, unless he thinks the 19% of the people who view Bush favorably can get him elected.
Reply
-
-

Justice4All1 year, 4 months ago
This is like rock, paper scisors. Hillary can beat Obama, Obama can beat McCain, but McCain can beat Hillary.
Reply -

GHOSTWHOWALKS1 year, 4 months ago
It really doesn't matter which of the three has to run against the other. All are in the pockets of special interest, belong to the CFR, they are just three faces of the same coin. Go ahead and vote because you really never had a choice of who to vote for. They are hand picked and the the winner has been decided. Doesn't matter one whit since none know crap about the economy, the real world problems we face, and will just continue the downward slide Le Muffette has started.
So go ahead and fuss, yell, degenerate into frothing at the mouth slaves, neg each other. Nothing is going to change. We've been sold a bill of goods and once again have the choice between the lesser of two evils. Let me remind you that the lesser of two evils, is still evil.
C'est Le Vie.
Reply -

JoseMadre1 year, 4 months ago
Sorry, but ABC/Washington Pravda Polls are wildly inaccurate. In any event, we are being manipulated by the press and by the pollsters. A perfect example is the State of Washington. In current polls, McCain is ahead of both Obama and Clinton, yet it is being called a "safe" Democratic state by Rasmussen. I should also point out that GOP candidates are known for closing late in Presidential Elections, and that Obama's less than stellar reality is beginning to shadow his rockstar facade.
Reply -

markmawn21 year, 4 months ago
With a fresh new Bush endorsement, it's gotta be all uphill, with a 99% grade.
Watch this snippet of Bush / McCain memorabilia:
http://video.lisarein.com/tvfunhouse/mccain-tvf...
Reply -

Tcaros1 year, 4 months ago
McCain needed to distance himself from the stench of Bush. The kooky ole fellow just can't make good decisions.
What part of "everyone thinks Bush is a horrible President" doesn't he understand? Unless he's listening to the 20% of the repugnates that are in denial.
Reply -

Tcaros1 year, 4 months ago
The real terrorists are in the White House and staff. Most Americans know this. It will be insteresting to see if all the voting machines work in Florida and Ohio!
Reply -

joeblowe1 year, 4 months ago
As soon as Hillary and Barry get themselves sorted out and can turn their attention to their REAL enemy, they will doubtless start bringing up John's record. And asking him to define what his platform is TODAY. And would he like some syrup with his waffles? Remember what happened to John Kerry when HE got that treatment? It didn't work out so well. So far, I expect to be writing in Ron Paul. NONE of the other three is fit, in my opinion.
If the Republicans REALLY wanted to win in '08, they SHOULD have actually supported Dr. Paul. If they had even entertained the idea of doing a little public education on the actual issues, and pointed out that Dr. Paul is likely the only one running who is really TRUSTWORTHY (AND qualified), I think he could have won on the issues. He isn't the cheerleader/orator that people seem to like though. As though saying something louder, with enthusiasm and a big smile is REALLY a measure of suitability -- or ability.
Reply -

markmawn21 year, 4 months ago
Some of you may have missed this in another post, but the "anti-Lobbyist" McCain has an adviser who is an Uber-Lobbyist:
Charles R. Black Jr., is chairman of one of Washington's lobbying powerhouses, BKSH and Associates. One of Black's clients is United Technologies .
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/ar...
UTC has is attempting to purchase all of the Diebold stocks at a 66% premium to Diebold's current share price.
It's on the UTC website: http://utc.com/press/releases/2008-03-02.htm
Gosh, I need to start working for the DNC...but I always hated clubs, clans and tribes.
Reply-
anioklyComment removed: User banned.
-
-
Welfare_Made_Me_RichComment removed: User banned.1 Reply
-

colekrazykat1 year, 4 months ago
Has anyone thought about the tirades Hillary had while in the White House? The things missing when they left and the "B"s missing from computor key boards? " How Petty"!!! This is only a few of her "Qualities". Read the book, " The Real Hillary".Bantam books. The secret service Hated her and her temper. Her arrogance scares the hell out of me!Check the past, present and future of each candidate to get an accurate picture of each person! You will be surprised!! Before you vote take the time to read as many different opinions as you can, to get a better picture of all the candidates!! Believe me, Its an eye opener and only takes some of your time! I am still researching all 3 candidates, so I can make an intelligent choice. Do not choose by party,sex,color,or religion. Choose by knowing the candidates and who they really are, and what they stand for, and do it on your own!! Thanks
Reply-

cloud151 year, 4 months ago
cole, sadly enough there are millions out their that don't bother reading the names on the ticket, they just look for republican or democrat and vote.
Reply -

IcCaRus1 year, 4 months ago
your appeal might have some weight had you remained neutral. the fact that yo0u chose to trash one (and only one) candidate pretty much negates your attempt to come off as "undecided"
Reply
-
-

wildman65571 year, 4 months ago
Hillary's supporters having been telling us to vote for her because she is more electable. Now we see a real poll and Obama has twice the lead over McCain that Hillary has.... It would be funny if the super delegates pushed Hillary in and she lost.... It is the Republicans only hope.
Reply -
anioklyComment removed: User banned.
-
HanymanComment removed: User banned.
-

HMMace1 year, 3 months ago
Mccain should have tried for the white house many years ago..he has too much baggage now...Unlike Obama, Mccaid did vote on the senate floor, so we know where he stands ,,
Not so Obama, he never voted for anything, so we do not know where he stands,,
AND--if you believe one word a politician says while running for office,you are a fool...
Reply -

staar1 year, 3 months ago
McCain will spend the summer trying to side-step Bush's endorsement.
Freaking funny quackpot!!!
Reply -

TRUECRISTIAN1 year, 3 months ago
think we get Osama Obama. He will enable alqueda to chop our heads off. Or another thing we will get Hillary's National Health Care. Please I am disabled and have enough trouble with social security/Medicare. I really wanted Romney, who spoke marvelously for conservatism but he did that dumb act like a middle of the roader deal. His final speech to the public was marvelous. I think Romney didn't show his conservative colors enough.
Reply


Add a Comment
Sign In With Your Propeller Account
Please keep your comments relevant to this story.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.