Archivists Block Release of Clinton Papers »

Posted By zaph22 1 year, 8 months ago in News

Officials with the presidential campaign of Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., criticized Sen. Clinton this week for not doing more to see that records from her husband's administration are made public. "She's been reluctant to disclose information," Obama's chief strategist David Axelrod told reporters in a conference call where he specifically

Read Full Story at news.aol.com »

179 Views Share Story 13 Comments Report

Submitted By:
zaph22

Other Related Articles:

Why not submit a story?

RSS Join the Discussion

+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 14 (view all)
- Display
  • Neutral
    tanglang1 year, 8 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    So the Clinton Crime Clique strikes again?

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    5 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • Neutral
    stephen-johnson1 year, 8 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    From the article:

    "However, 1,500 pages were either partially redacted or withheld entirely, including 300 pages covering internal White House communications on pardon decisions, such as memos to and from the president, and reports on which pardon requests the Justice Department opposed."

    I'm no Clinton fan, but I wonder just how much internal Executive Branch information should be released to the general public. If aides are unwilling to speak freely for fear of being recorded, is the president well served? In this instance, no vital information is at risk, Clinton's refusal to release info is just CYA. But once the precedent is set, people can demand information about anything.

    Why doesn't the press ever file Freedom of Information suits against the courts or Congress? Why is the Executive Branch the only target for these suits?

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply
    loading loading ...
    • Neutral
      nostalgia1 year, 8 months ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      Judicial Watch has been trying to get many Clinton records

      Here is the story on their website:

      National Archives to Release Hillary Clinton's White House Daily Schedules to Judicial Watch before March 20

      Archives Seeks to Delay Processing Telephone Logs "One to Two Years"

      Judical Watch announced today that the National Archives and Records Administration notified the U.S. District Court on March 1 that it expects to release to Judicial Watch 10,000 pages of former First Lady Hillary Clinton's daily schedule records by March 20, 2008, the date of a status hearing in Judicial Watch's lawsuit in the matter

      he Archives, however, suggests it will take "one to two years" to begin processing Hillary Clinton's telephone logs.

      http://www.judicialwatch.org/national-archives-...

      More info here:

      http://www.judicialwatch.org/hillarywatch.shtml

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply
      loading loading ...
      • Neutral
        ghengisghan1 year, 8 months ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        The Clintons ARE the archivist. They can release any records they want as they are their personal papers.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
        Reply
        loading loading ...
        • Neutral
          RelishHotdog1 year, 8 months ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          Hope they get caught up with their weasel ways. It is a matter of time.

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
          Reply
          loading loading ...
          • Neutral
            Howtogo1 year, 8 months ago

            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

            It would be interesting to actually see the list of the pardoned crooks. I would like to know just how much Mark Rich (via his wife) paid Bill to let him go. I would also like to see the hour of the last day when Bill pardoned them all.

            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
            Reply
            loading loading ...
            • Neutral
              jaern1 year, 8 months ago

              This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

              President Bush signed an order in November 2001 that broadened former presidents' prerogative to block the release of internal White House records.

              I remember thinking what does his dad have to hide.

              (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
              Reply
              loading loading ...
              View All 14 Comments

              Add a Comment

              Sign In With Your Propeller Account

              Forgot your password?

              Please keep your comments relevant to this story.

              To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.

              More News

              Submit a Story

              Advertisement

              Story Tags ?

              Hey! If you Sign In, you can add tags to this story!

              Also Dropping This Article

              No one has dropped this story.

              Groups Watching This

              No groups are watching this story. Why not share it with your groups?

              Also Submitted By

              No one else has submitted this story.