Comments for Obama Demands Probe Over Passport Breach »
Posted By Neophile 1 year, 7 months ago in NewsBarack Obama's campaign tonight is demanding a full investigation of reports that his passport files at the State Department were viewed without authorization.
Read Full Story at boston.com »
RSS Join the Discussion
+ Add CommentShowing 293 of 294 Comments
-
Neutral
TimALoftis1 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
more from MSNBC News
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23736254/
Reply-
Neutral
jordan111 year, 7 months ago
-
capecoralMComment removed: Retracted by user13 Replies
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Neutral
Shadowolf1 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
...my theory is that "They" is actually a front for ex-intel types who start rumors, then track them to find out how far and fast they spread, and how much the rumors mutate en route...supposedly located on the Kansas City Strip, "THEY" are supposedly apolitical, considering ALL politicians to be nuts...
Reply -
-
-
-
-
-
raats6662Comment removed: Retracted by user46 Replies
-
-
Neutral
GWHayduke1 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
There's a lot of red tape associated with the largest government ever assembled in the US.
That, and the McCarthy style of operating in which Cheney engages takes some extensive cleaning up before it can become public.
You know, "The dog ate my e-mails", "we dont know who leaked that information" and "I'm not a member of the Executive Branch."
Reply-
-
Neutral
blinkers1 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Some of this is reminiscent of Richard Nixon's "Dirty tricks" brigade, but cleverer.
Nixon, for his sins, had to resign in disgrace. George W. Bush, for his, will gracefully retire to the ranch, sink a few beers, and start thinking about the lecture circuit.
Reply -
-
-
-
-
-
Neutral
sonofjohn1 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Shades of Bush number one's passportgate...searching Gov. Clinton's overseas trips for political purposes. Seems the monitoring system, put in place to detect unauthorized access to VIP passport information, seems to have worked. The question is how was the investigation into these unauthorized access of Obama's passport info handled?
Reply -
-
palamaComment removed: Retracted by user
-
-
Neutral
ningyo1 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
i love the way everyone here immediately blames the executive for this--given the history of people who might be culpable its ONLY hillary with a record of using the FBI and state dept to ILLEGALY obtain records of clinton opponents..remember livingstone and the 1100 rebublican fbi files that dissapeared...hmmmmm..but in true libscape left loony tunnel vision it HAS to be the evil bush..my money is on hillary at the bottom of this...and in reality ...why so many trips to indonesia and tripoli etc..maybe its all innocent but obama never answers questions about any of this..he ducks and weaves..he fumfers..just answer the question hussein
Reply-
Neutral
pc251 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
of course it's the Clintons ........look how they had Sandy Berger go into the National Archives to remove national security documents pertaining to their administration to keep them from the 9/11 commission........I find it extremely odd though that this is happening now with all the troubles his campaign is beginning to encounter........
Reply -
-
-
-
-
-
-
Neutral
amazed1 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I really believe the most LIKELY explanation is a few bored clerks realized that they could actually look at a few files and decided to go for it. There's nothing in what's posted to suggest anything else except for the Oliver Stone mindset of those on the left.
When you hear hoofbeats, it's more likely to be a horse than a zebra.
Reply -
-
-
PsychoHosebeastComment removed: Spammer, Abusive1 Reply
-
-
-
Neutral
pc251 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
it couldn't possibly be that with all the troubles starting to face him and his polling numbers in free fall it's the perfect time to play the victim now.....let's get those polling numbers up to where they were.... and what better way to do it then some nefarious right wing conspiracy or better yet shades of unauthorized removal of national security documents from the national archives by that Clinton mole Sandy Berger..... of course with his power and his connections as a US Senator he has no connections to anyone who is a supporter of his in the State Department who could do this at his behest.......no of course not........not Obama.......change you can believe in..........
NEG AWAY
Reply -
-
Neutral
not2needy1 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Three breaches of confidential information since January, and they are trying to say it was curiosity!
Regardless of who is behind this, it's illegal.
I am a retired state worker, and i know the reasons people snoop into other's people's business, and it's never for a good cause, or completely innocent!
Reply-
Neutral
amazed1 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Are you REALLY going to say, that after a whole lifetime in social work, you never, not even ONCE, came across a file that was just plain interesting --even though it wasn't your case -- so you read it? Or, picked up something that really wasn't for your eyes, but intrigued you so you finished reading it?
If that is true, then you are either the purest person on earth since the Virgin Mother or a iiar.
Reply-
-
Neutral
amazed1 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
not excuses, just not necessarily the big, evil conspiracy that so many of you are trying to make this into.
Show me some proof that Bush or Clinton was behind this and I'm with you 100%.
I don't condone this, I think those guys should be fired for sure and probably arrested, but that DOESN'T prove that they were acting on the behest of anyone else. People, as a rule are just plain nosy.
con't
Reply-
Neutral
amazed1 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I have a small company, we all know each other, we all get along, my husband and I work right next to everyone else-- we don't expect others to do the "dirty work" that we won't do. But, I learned the hard way, I cannot trust others not to look at stuff if I leave it on my desk -- even if it's clearly something they shouldn't be looking at. It is only human nature, and by keeping those things under lock and key and passworded, I have, inadvertently, made that stuff even MORE attractive to my employees. This does not make them terrible, nasty people. It doesn't even make them nosier than average. It's just human nature.
Reply
-
-
-
-
-
Neutral
TOD3961 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Hilarious. The people who did the snooping were either fired or disciplined, yet here we have Obama's camp asking for a "full investigation". Get over it. If we are going to ask for a "full investigation" over Obama's passport files, we had also better get one going on Brittany Spear's medical file brreach too. It is far more damaging to have your medical records breached, than your passport info.
But yet, I haven't heard any of you complaining about Brittany's right to privacy.
What a bunch of...
Reply-
AlphaGnosisComment removed: Hard Banned3 Replies
-
Neutral
jordan111 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Hilarious. The people who did the snooping were either fired or disciplined, yet here we have Obama's camp asking for a "full investigation".>>>>>
My gawd! A security breach at the State Dept. should OF COURSE have a full investigation! WTH is wrong with you? Doesn't matter WHO they looked up. They had access to sensitive material, and they peeked. YOU may not have a problem with some jerks looking at secured information, but I ldo!
Reply-
PsychoHosebeastComment removed: Spammer, Abusive
-
-
Neutral
TOD3961 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Once again, for those who have ADD, three people looked into Obama's files. Two were fired and the other was disciplined. How can you say that more needs to be done? What more can you do? If these files are that critical, that we need a Congress oversight committee to waste time and money to determine that something went wrong, then we should destroy these files immediately. They are far too important to even have in existence.
Get over it...
Reply-
Neutral
slate1 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Yeah look into it, the thing is many here always assume it's Bush and Co behind everything from 9/11 to storms and now add this one to the list. Who knows, we may find that they were just smucks looking around or that they were part of a vast left wing operation.
Reply
-
-
-
Neutral
DeadXXXManXXXTalkin1 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
''I haven't heard any of you complaining about Brittany's right to privacy.''
If only the government could be as transparent as Brittany getting into a car with the flashes flashing...
Did someone already bring up Brittany here or deny her right to privacy?
Reply
-
-
Neutral
PatrioticAmerican1 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
What is obama afraid they will find???? is he a little nervous about something??? i think he has something that he doesnt want to get out. what happened to full disclosure??? Let me guess if Bushs passport info was looked into that would be okay because he is a repub and dems are above this being done to them ??? So i think i just figured this out. False accusations and lies about Bush are 100% okay but to look into someones travels in the past who has ties to less then reputable people is wrong ??? yep its the 1 sided way of the dems rearing it ugly head again ...
Reply-
Locky12Comment removed: Spammer, Abusive
-
-
Neutral
PatrioticAmerican1 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
LOL no mind game here look at the facts so far, Dad is muslim, Stepdad is muslim, both are radicals,(and according to Islamic law that makes him muslim), muslim school for 6 years during the age group that can be brainwashed and converted, associated with farracon and the guy on trial right now (sry name slips my mind), his chruch is problack not proamerican, and his mentor and his "spiritual" leader and a man he looks up too is Very antiamerican and antiwhite. And he has never denounced NOT being a muslim, all he will say is that he is christian.
so you tell me what mind game im playing. im going with facts.
Reply-
-
-
-
PsychoHosebeastComment removed: Spammer, Abusive
-
-
-
PsychoHosebeastComment removed: Spammer, Abusive1 Reply
-
-
-
-
Neutral
protoham1 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I have a passport, and what are they going to find out, where he was born, date of birth? Some travel info. They could probably get a lot more out of his trash can and I am sure his FBI and CIA file contain a lot more.
As senator (one of the most powerful men in DC) you would think he could prevent this from happening. The problem is he is part of the problem. What is he doing to protect my information?
Reply-
Neutral
endtyranny1 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Senators are not in charge of the State Department, the Secretary of State is. Obama is no more responsible for this security breach than John McCain, Mitch McConnell or Joe Lieberman. As for what he's doing to protect your information and safety, you might want to check the story.
Reply -
-
-
-
-
Neutral
endtyranny1 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
This happened on three separate occasions, by three different low level contract employees. It's interesting that, when push comes to shove, the Republicans on this forum don't give a single thought to our national security. None of you cares what other information has been available to anybody who decides to snoop on confidential government information?
Reply-
-
Neutral
not2needy1 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
They will defend and make excuses for their political party if the end result is that they have to start eating out of dumpsters.
In reality, i know a young man who is a republican, devout republican, defends everything they do with a vengence. He is working a minimum wage job and if it wasn't for his girlfriend who lives in subsidized housing and receives SSI, he would be homeless. He doesn't care, all that is important to him is supporting republicans.
He admits that during the Clinton years he had good jobs, lived well, had nice cars,,, NOW HE'S WALKING! But none of that is important, only being a repub is important to him.
Classic repub attitude.
Reply
-
-
Neutral
amazed1 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I just never realize that my passport was such a high security document.
What's on your passport -- name, address, date of birth, country of origin, citizenship, where you've traveled. Now, your birthdate is sort of something you don't want bandied about, but, most people don't hide it except maybe the year. The rest of this stuff is not all that confidential.
Of course, if the state department has evidence of international shennagins and THAT's the file that was breached, then I could see what the big deal is.
Reply-
-
Neutral
endtyranny1 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Have you ever applied for a passport? There's not only the paperwork that you have to fill out, but a whole lot more that the government fills out. At the very least these guys had access to his social security number, and it's just not feasible that that and the actual passport are the only information contained on the classified government file.
Reply -
-
-
-
Locky12Comment removed: Spammer, Abusive
-
Neutral
jordan111 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
This was done 3x, beginning in January. Apparently by "contract employees." Hmmm. Were they given a security clearance? Or was it just given to their employer who's supposed to screen their employees? What else did they peek at? It's that easy to breach security in our country? Three times? What, not enough info the first time, or the second? What did they think would change?
So, Obama's people got back to them as quickly as they learned, & demanded an investigation. When faux newsmax printed its lie, Obama's people got a swift retraction. I have a hunch Obama isn't going to be namby pamby about SOB's screwing with him.
Finally, I have to say this; WHO is running the state dept. that allows for such a breach? THREE TIMES! (that we know about, of course).Does this tell anyone anything about the privatization of government responsibilities? Hello. Anybody home?
Reply -
Neutral
spottedowl1 year, 7 months ago
-
-
Neutral
amazed1 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Yeah, actually it is. Airline manifests are not confidential. Travel agents have no confidentality requirements or priviledges. If I am on trial for something, my doctor cannot testify for or against me on anything s/he learned as my doctor -- either about my phyical state or my mental state. My travel agent cannot refuse to testify as to my whereabouts or what tickets I bought.
Reply-
Neutral
cushi1 year, 7 months ago
-
Neutral
amazed1 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
you know, I see you're point, but ALL of my posts were made before you even got here to the thread.
My problem really is not with the disciplining of these people -- they should be fired and probably have charges brought against them. My problem is with those who are absolutely admamant that this was done at the behest of (choose who you can't stand or outright hate more) Bush or Clinton. Hell, maybe they got together to gang up on Obama and it's BOTH of them.
Without one SHRED of evidence or even an allusion to either camp using this info.
Reply
-
-
Neutral
ADAGUY1 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
"If I am on trial for something, my doctor cannot testify for or against me on anything s/he learned as my doctor"
Is someone testifying?
NO!
Like I said, ther is no difference. Both are private, both require your permission for an UNAUTHORIZED person to view them.
The courts decide who is AUTHORIZED!
Reply
-
-
-
Neutral
Charlson1 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
What kind of response is this? What's he got to hid? Nothing. I got nothing in my records that I'm afraid of too, but damn, I'll go after you with every legal means available if you looked at my personal, and therefore, restricted from your prying eyes, information. But that is not the issue here. As in almost every scandal in this administration, everything is done for politics, not the security or interests of our country but for a political party. It is very interesting and an incredible coincidence that each of these security breaches was done after a peak in Obama's polls and after he won crucial primaries. I'd call this looking for dirt on a political opponent using government, restricted resources...illegal spying. No he doesn't have anything to hide, but the republicans do. Why else resort to these methods?
Reply -
Neutral
amazed1 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
you don't KNOW that it was "done" by this administration, or Hilary's camp or if it was just a couple of bored clerks.
Everyone is so quick to rush to judgement -- and the judgement is never kind.
If this information had been used in anyway, I'd be right here with you on the breach of security bandwagon. But, it hasn't been.
And, as far as no one, ever, ever looking at info that they shouldn't see just out of idle curiosity, that will never stop until everything is totally automated and no human eyes ever has to look at any personal information.
Sad, but true.
Reply-
-
-
Neutral
DeadXXXManXXXTalkin1 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
''Everyone is so quick to rush to judgement -- and the judgement is never kind''
I was thinking the same thing on an 'Obama the racist' thread yesterday.
what it is is bad cop police work, reaching a conclusion first and studying the evidence after in the light of your conclusion.
It's like what this administration did by asking about Iraq with 24 hours after 9/11, and the subsequent shuffling of the evidence about the 'threat' of Iraq
Off topic sure, but anytime you give evidence a quick perfunctory glance and reach a conclusion, chances are the conclusion was there all along
Reply -
-
-
-
-
-
Neutral
cushi1 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Yep, only crooks like Bush and Cheney can hide behind it with full approval!
Now there's your crooks for you, Debra. What you said about Barack Obama is character assassination, bordering on slander, because you have NO basis for making such a remark!
Reply -
-
-
-
-
-
-
Neutral
OpenYourBlindEye081 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Once again the Liberal conspiracy theorists swarm whenever Keith unleashes his MSNBC (More Speculation News Broadcasting Company) minions to speculate and try to divert attention from Obama's absolutely dismal week and plunging ratings. Clearly Obama's handlers are hoping to create some kind, any kind of change of subject. Hate to tell you, but if just once people would let the story actually develop, they might actually base their reports on facts. Nice try, but Barack can't run or hide from this week's story, no matter how much air time CNN, MSNBC and Air America give him to try and get out of the hole he has dug for himself.
Reply-
Neutral
DeadXXXManXXXTalkin1 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
problem is, 'this week's story' is a non-story
'a preacher says crazy things from a pulpit'
if it wasn't so stupid it would be funny
'a preacher says crazy things from a pulpit' is a 'dog bites man'
now if it was 'a preacher said rational things from a pulpit' now thats a good 'man bites dog'
too bad Obama over-reacted and started playing politics
he shoulda just turned Blind Eye, or ear, uh, Open your Blind Eye
gving the matter attention and maneuvering and making speeches about it just gives it 'legitimacy' it doesn't deserve
I thought professional politicians were slicker than this
now because he gave it legitimizing attention, he's provided more ammo
everyone knows race is a minefield, so why is he lobbing words at it in a campaign?
It's just not smart
what with people waiting to jump on a single ill-chosen word like 'typical' to pop up so they can attach dire significance to it
Reply
-
-
Neutral
most_reasonable1 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Forcing Hillary to account for every minute as 1st Lady was not a problem for those that look for dirt...that includes YOU Obama, who was fast to jump on THAT wagon.
Let's see if anything interesting comes out of the leaked passport info.
Reply -
-
-
-
Neutral
Dionys1 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
"If you've got nothing to hide, why do you care if your rights were violated, the law was broken and the constitution decimated."
It's called the rule of law. If our own people can't live by it, then how can we expect other countries to honor laws in place to protect our citizens as well as theirs.
It's frankly terrifying that so many RepugnantCons are willing to let the law be violated again and again. I guess we can see who the real terrorists in this country are: Bush, Cheney and their ilk.
Reply -
-
-
-
-
Neutral
walden31 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Imagine all the snoopy snooping that may be going on at all the different government agencies on people who have no idea that they're being spied on.
Obama just happens to be the most public target who found out about it.
It's much more widespread then anyone knows and anyone cares to admit.
The Bush Administration has tapped every single phone call, email and Internet search being conducted in the US.
How is all the information being collected being used?
Reply-
Neutral
DeadXXXManXXXTalkin1 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
''The Bush Administration has tapped every single phone call, email and Internet search being conducted in the US.''
good for the goose good for the gander: I guess we all have something to hide and are guilty at something-why else would they be looking at our info?
If anyone wants to conclude anything about Obama because of such snooping and his reaction to it, careful you aren't hoisted on your own leotards
Reply
-
-
Neutral
nostalgia1 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Andea Mitchell just reported on this on MSNBC. I have always found her information to be accurate. In instances where anything new comes to light that contradicts her orignal report she has been very good about reporting on the new info
She said: 3 contract employees in 3 different passport offices. The supervisors did not pass the information up to the higher levels in the State Dept until yesterday
More info here:
Patrick F. Kennedy, Under Secretary for Management
On-the-Record Briefing on Unauthorized Accessed Passport Records
http://www.state.gov/m/rls/102460.htm
Mitchell also said there is no mechanism in place that would allow the State Dept to compel contract employees to answer questions. Any investigation of contract employees would have to be handled by the Justice Dept
Reply -
-
Neutral
ghengisghan1 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
It should and IS being investigated. The workers were fired(probably to be reinstated because of union affiliation) and in all probability will be prosecuted. Follow the trail where ever it may lead though I suspect it was a couple idiots just being stupid.
Reply -
Neutral
cherev1 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
"I chose to run for the presidency at this moment in history because I believe deeply that we cannot solve the challenges of our time unless we solve them together - unless we perfect our union by understanding that we may have different stories, but we hold common hopes; that we may not look the same and we may not have come from the same place, but we all want to move in the same direction - towards a better future for our children and our grandchildren. "
This, from Obama's speech, is an important lesson for all Republicans. Whether or not he meant it isn't important. What is important is that, while Obama may "talk the talk", what's more important is how his followers react: how they accuse, without any evidence whatsoever. And note their words...note them carefully. Are they filled with the substance of what Obama said?
Reply-
Neutral
amazed1 year, 7 months ago
-
-
Neutral
amazed1 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
what is YOUR intrepretation of that quote, about I wasn't getting that from his campaign before. Frankly, I would have been just as happy in ignorance about his church and his whacky pastor, but the explanations and the spin that is coming out of his camp is quite disconcerting and now that either Hilary or McCain's camp threw the race card right down on the table, Obama seems more than happy to pick it up and play it.
Since the pastoral controversy started, anyone questioning Obama and/or his judgement have been shouted down as racists. Now, from Obama's mouth itself, we get the same thing -- although much more eloquently and subtly put.
Reply-
Neutral
amazed1 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
wow -- the beginning of that comment got so scrambled I'm not even sure what I said.
Try again. What is YOUR interpretation of that quote? I really wasn't getting that message from his campaign before all this stuff hit the fan. ...
The rest is what I typed (or at least what I intended to type)
Gotta love that propeller.
Reply-
-
Neutral
amazed1 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
where would the fun be if we all agreed? It's what I like best about propeller and miss most about those long ago college days -- where you have these heated debates and then all go for beer.
And, today, people changed my mind. I wasn't too concerned about this when I started -- but I'm in agreement that those who breached the security should be dealt with harshly. I'm still not convinced of the conspiracy, though.
Reply
-
-
-
-
-
Neutral
cherev1 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
"the lesson being that unless you vote for Obama you're voting for racism and division???"
Not at all. The lesson is that Obama can "talk the talk" all he wants, but his supporters are ignoring his message of unity. The accusations against the Republicans spewing forth without any evidence to back it up speak to the entrenched liberal mindsent of "they're the enemy". So while Obama speaks of unity and they all think he's wonderful and applaud his words, the reality is that the libbies don't want unity at all. They need the Republicans, or more specifically the "Neocons" as "the enemy".
You want more proof? Look at the negs my comment got. Forgetting neo who's a jack@ss and will neg me for breathing, these libbies can't stand when someone exposes their hypocrisy. An honest libbie (unlikely but statistically possible) would say, "you know, you're right. We are accusing without evidence." But not these folks.
Reply-
-
SwampFox-82ndComment removed: Retracted by user2 Replies
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Neutral
walden31 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Do you like government looking through your records? Who you've called and for how long? What you've been looking at on the Internet? Who you sent emails to and the subject of the email? Your banking information and medical records?
It's not a question of whether or not there is something to hide.
The question is one much more fundamental then that.
The question is whether the United States should be the type of country where government employees and elected officials should have unfettered and uncontrolled access to all the information about citizens that the government has on its hard drives.
Now if that uncontrolled and unfettered access doesn't scare you it should.
Reply
-
-
Neutral
ningyo1 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
i think it will be the result of a few bored clerks that found something they could poke around in--kind of like getting caught stealing paper clips--but with all the rest of the REAL questions building about the ophantom candidate he's desperate to put something else on the front page --especially something where can posture himself as the wronged ,unfairly attacked ,bigot-fighting hero--lets ask michelle if she's still so proud her hubby and america now--she's more abrasive and crude than teresa so i think her comments would be very entertaining
Reply -
-
-
-
rdy2rckComment removed: Hard Banned
-
-
-
-
-
Neutral
Amanda_Krown1 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Scandal in White House!!!! Obama in exclusive video interview
here is : http://usa-top-news.info/BBC/Obama_in_exclusive...
Reply -
Neutral
most_reasonable1 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Obama has been very quick to join on the most recent "search for the blue dress" antics of the likes of the Judicial Watch and other right wing groups. Putting teams of "searchers" looking through the records of Hillary. Maybe that's what he meant about joining the GOP in a hands across effort.
Obama's most recent gaff, "my grandmother acted like a TYPICAL white person" would have DEMANDED immediate dismissal from the liberal press. Today it is a host of Obama supporters claiming "well what he REALLY meant was....."
Reply -
-
Neutral
walden31 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Which makes it the perfect Republican scandal because you want to blame dems. What perfect politics like with the pictures of Obama in some African dress or the Wright sermons. The repubs play dirty and Hillary gets blamed for it. It's a win/win situation.
Reply-
rdy2rckComment removed: Hard Banned
-
-
-
-
-
Neutral
fempatriot1 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Hill & Bill want to get back into the White House baaad. The Clinton years were scandalous, but witnesses DIED, & the Clintons managed to weasel out of trouble. One of the strangest cases was African-American Ron Brown, whose plane just went down in Europe, killing all aboard. Hillary had flown in the same plane just days earlier, & made her trip fine. There were A FEW news items that said Ron Brown also had a bullet hole in his skull. I waited for the outrage, the demand for an investigation--none ever came. I waited for the A. A. community to be up in arms--Nothing. Brown was to have testified in an important case--can't remember what, but it had to do with Clinton's reign. We're going to get McCain or Clinton for Prez--they're both in the POLITICAL MACHINE. PROFESSIONAL POLITICIANS.
Reply -
Neutral
most_reasonable1 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
"Hill & Bill want to get back into the White House baaad."
The country needs them to get back into the Whitehouse baaaaad.
Your nonsense smear of Hillary causing deaths smells of the same nonsense that the grooood Rev. Wright uses to bash WHITEY and claim that the United States invented aids to spred among Africans.
BTW FEMpatriot, you need a shave....baaaaaad.
Reply -
Neutral
allasam1 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
You'll notice in that "breach" it was said originally that State Department "CONTRACTORS" looked at Obama's passport. Translate that as BLACKWATER personnel. Yep. folks, before they start shooting us in the streets, they need to know all about us.
Reply -
Neutral
nostalgia1 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Back to the drawing board all conspiracy theorists
Just reported on CNBC:
Clinton's passport records were breached in 2007 - described as a training mistake by David Gregory
The same person who looked at Obama's records in March also accessed McCain's
Mort Zuckerman had an interesting comment - he wondered if these contract employees were hoping to find some info they could sell to the tabloids
Reply-
Neutral
jordan111 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
he wondered if these contract employees were hoping to find some info they could sell to the tabloids>>>>
Could be. It also begs the question of what else would they "sell", if that were true. Our national security doesn't appear secure at all.
Reply-
Neutral
nostalgia1 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Apparently from what was reported - the system worked and the immediate supervisors were alerted right away and took action
Where the system failed - the immediate supervisors failed to forward the info up the chain to the higher levels in DC
A reporter found out about the breaches and called the State Dept for a comment yesterday. That was the first time higher level people at State heard about it
Reply -
-
-
Neutral
jordan111 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Wait a minute! How come they didn't mention McCain yesterday? And I actually turned on CNN to see what's being said about this, & the person who 'supposedly' looked @ McCain's record too is the one who wasn't fired. Hello! What's wrong with this picture? How convenient this all is.
Reply-
Neutral
nostalgia1 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
They didn't mention Clinton yesterday either
As far as the person who looked at the Obama and McCain files in March - remember the 3 people were in different passport offices.
Apparently the first 2 incidents were "handled by the book" according to the State Dept spokesman
That told me the 3rd supervisor did not follow procedure in terminating the employee.
Reply -
-
-
-
Neutral
saintetienne1 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
"News â;; Barack Obama's campaign tonight is demanding a full investigation of reports that his passport files at the State Department were viewed without authorization."
....thus illustrating how this jerry-built, collapsing ruin of a campaign is now reaching for ANYTHING to try to pull attention away from Obama's 20-year association with "Reverend Redd Foxx" Wright.
Grab some popcorn, folks. It's going to be fun watching the Obama campaign and the Clinton campaign drag out bushelfuls of each others dirty laundry, right up to the incendiary Democratic Convention - which itself should be a riot! But the real event comes in November, when the Dump-o-crats lose the presidential election and the party splinters in pieces amidst scandal, fraud and in-fighting.
You couldn't MAKE UP better material!
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
Reply -
Neutral
endtyranny1 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I'm watching the press conference now, and it turns out that they have already found that these kind of breaches have occurred on at least two other occasions. During the summer of 2007, Hillary Clinton's file was accessed. Earlier this year, John McCain's file was accessed, as well.
Reply-
Neutral
endtyranny1 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
More:
-The same person that accessed Barack Obama's information most recently also accessed John McCain's information earlier this year. He has been "admonished and disciplined", but not fired.
-The State Department is "not prepared to provide the names of the companies that employed these contractors".
Reply-
Neutral
saintetienne1 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
"The State Department is "not prepared to provide the names of the companies that employed these contractors".
Speaking of contractors, has anyone seen or heard from John Glasgow? He's the CFO of the contracting company that built the Clinton Presidential Library in Arkansas. He mysteriously vanished on January 28, 2008.
The reason I ask is because he is yet another in a long, LONG line of people associated with the Clintons who has vanished, died under mysterious circumstances, or have been murdered. Perhaps the government should be looking at more than Hillary's passport files.
And given the shady characters that are emerging from Obama's past, I think it's high time somebody dove into more than his passport files, as well. If one of these two yayhoo's is going to be our next president (pause, for snicker and muffled laughter), I'd like to see some disclosure on them.
Oh, and by the way - - still waiting for the Clinton's tax returns....
Reply-
Neutral
walden31 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Yeah according to you we have more to worry about:
from some guy that rose from basically being born on the kitchen table of some cheap mobile home with a single mother and a drunk absent father to the highest office in the land.
Then we have to fear from the son of an ex-head of the CIA and ex-president and his VP who has been in and out of government his whole life, SECDEF and head of one of the largest military contractors. GWB's granddad was also a senator and military contractor during WWII. Educated in all the proper, private schools. GWB is the definition of legacy. Look it up in the dictionary.
Hell, Cheney has already shot one guy in the face.
And you think some hillbilly from Arkansas is more connected?
Why do you hate people who are like a Horatio Alger story?
Reply
-
-
-
loading ...
