Story Comments
Posted by: walden3 1 year, 7 months ago
This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.
-

walden31 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
TOD-
It's not that simple. Back in the day someone could graduate high school and get a good job in a factory, buy a house and support a family with the one job.
Now both parents need to work. Now gains in productivity aren't being shared with the workers. Corrected incomes have been almost flat for 30 years. Savings are non-existent. Kids graduate with more loans than ever before. What made us great, manufacturing, is DOA. The number of hungry Americans and those living in poverty is increasing. The number of kids that live longer and longer with their parents is increasing. Private pensions have disappeared. The hours we work increase and the time away decreases.
Economic opportunity ain't what it once was.
Don't get distracted by the bread and circus.
Check out these articles:
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/03/business/your...
http://www.alternet.org/workplace/63031/
http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/news/releases/child_...
Reply-
ranchhandComment removed: Retracted by user
-

blinkers1 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
This is a great post walden. I think you have it nailed. Once disparities start opening up in a developed economy, they're almost impossible to turn around. An increasingly large slice of the pie is being shared among a smaller and smaller segment of the population.
(And when the commander-in-chief himself says openly that the people he likes are the "haves and have-mores" the trend is further strengthened).
Reply-

walden31 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Ranch and Blinkers-
I saw this article too, "Income inequality grew significantly in 2005, with the top 1 percent of Americans â;; those with incomes that year of more than $348,000 â;; receiving their largest share of national income since 1928, analysis of newly released tax data shows."
http://www.starnewsonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/art...
That's just not good for social stability.
Reply
-
-
-
People Who Liked This Comment (26)
People Who Didn't Like This Comment (0)
No one voted this comment negatively.
Submit a Story
Advertisement

loading ...
Post Reply
You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.