States may free inmates to save millions »

Posted By not2needy 1 year, 8 months ago in News

Lawmakers from California to Kentucky are trying to save money with a drastic and potentially dangerous budget-cutting proposal: releasing tens of thousands of convicts from prison, including drug addicts, thieves and even violent criminals.

Read Full Story at news.yahoo.com »

338 Views Share Story 54 Comments Report

Submitted By:
not2needy

Hi And Welcome
I am a Christian, Wife, Mother of one son, Liberal, and retired social worker. I enjoy my computer, gardening, reading, cooking and ...

Other Related Articles:

Why not submit a story?

RSS Join the Discussion

+ Add Comment
Showing 106 of 171 Comments (view all)
- Display
  • Neutral
    not2needy1 year, 8 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    FTA:

    Officials acknowledge that the idea carries risks, but they say they have no choice because of huge budget gaps brought on by the slumping economy.

    Isn't that just what every state needs right now, felons, thieves, car jackers, crazed druggies and pedophiles turned loose, with what could result in a reduced police force, also caused by the economy slump!!!!????

    Just who would we have to thank for this good news?

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    33 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • Neutral
    walden31 year, 8 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    We have way too many people in jail. I think that I've read we have more people in jail then Russia and China. 1/3 of black men are involved in the penal system. It's wrong in a free country.

    Jeesh, now every small town needs own their high tech anti-terrorist huge RV and SWAT team. The militarization of our police force is sucking the breath out of our country.

    1. Legalize drugs. License their distribution. Tax them.

    2. Get rid of mandatory sentencing.

    3. Offer real occupational training and support for when inmates are released.

    4. Don't imprison the those convicted of less serious crimes with serious felons where they become hardened to learn additional criminal ways.

    5. Release the non-violent to make room for the violent.

    6. Those that will never be released store them in basic, cheap warehouses/barracks so we can divert funds and resources to those that can be rehabilitated.

    Unfortunately, due to politics, it's always about being tougher on crime.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    24 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • Neutral
    not2needy1 year, 8 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    Personally, i feel that it's a crime to spend tax payers money prosecuting people for marijuana.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    1 Reply

    loading loading ...
  • Neutral
    AntiNeoCon1 year, 8 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    Most often the sentences are too long for the committed crime. 5 years behind bars living with cons is a long time. The longer terms should be for violent crimes, rape, murder, armed robbery, etc.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    3 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • Neutral
    RedRiverJ1 year, 8 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    No surprise here, if our illustrious officials are willing to let illegal immigrants in by the millions, what's the harm of a few murders, child molesters and rapists added to a problem that is way out of hand and most certainly defies any logic. Boned heads.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    9 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • Neutral
    icono11 year, 8 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    I wonder if the elected politicians in those states mentioned would also consider a personal reduction in pay as a way to save money? Or would they, the politicians, release the prisoners then give themselves a pay raise for such a progressive money saving move on their part?

    Then after the released criminals start doing crimes again the same 'save the tax payers money' politicians could jump on the anti-crime bandwagon 'again' and give themselves another pay raise for being tough on crime 'again'. I don't see this 'release the criminals to save money' as a money saving move. It's just a move that will enable career and ambitious politicians a way to secure their jobs and/or pay raises into the future by being anti crime then being anti waste then back to being anti crime,,, etc, etc, etc.

    Would our politicians treat us that way? Sure they would, for there is big money for them, not us, in this move.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    3 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • Neutral
    lvrofwolves1 year, 7 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    I would be very disapointed in the justice system if they released violent criminals and pedophiles. And what about illegal aliens?

    I'm for WORK camps for violent prisoners to pay back society for their crimes and pay their own room and board. Why should society be victimized twice!

    As far as drugs go, legalize some, tax them etc....that would solve alot of small petty possession drug cases.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    1 Reply

    loading loading ...
  • Neutral
    jordan111 year, 7 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    I have no problem in freeing anyone in prison for smoking pot. It's insane to incarcerate them.

    http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=3539

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    2 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • Neutral
    DoseASpinoza1 year, 7 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    Where's Barney Frank when we need him?

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    1 Reply

    loading loading ...
  • Neutral
    willottica1 year, 7 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    Hmm... seems the Iraq war isn't the only one running out of money, the War on Drugs is also costing too much. Time to admit defeat on that one as well? Or continue trying to fight it in the same tired way which obviously seems to be failing.

    Question: when you fight a war on drugs, what are your weapons? What is the goal? How do you declare "Mission Accomplished"?

    Advice to the President(s) of the United States: stop declaring wars that you can't possibly win (because there is no foreseeable victory condition -- How do you know you've won the War on Terror? How do you know you've won the War on Drugs?).

    (Don't get me wrong, it's good to fight against Terrorism, but I don't think you can do that through war. I think you fight terrorism by helping less fortunate societies, not exploiting them, not occupying their lands and setting the scene for them to feel even more embittered.)

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    1 Reply

    loading loading ...
  • Neutral
    Lurch1 year, 7 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    At midyear 1998, an estimated 283,800 mentally ill offenders were incarcerated in the nation's prisons and jails.

    http://www.aca.org/government/healthcare.asp#me...

    How many would have never committed a crime and would be productive members of society if given decent treatment before committing a crime? For most, prison is the only place where they have ever received or will ever receive treatment. What is wrong with this picture?

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    4 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • Neutral
    Georgia501 year, 7 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    How dare they release these dangerous losers! I say keep them on Capitol Hill where they belong!

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply
    loading loading ...
    View All 171 Comments

    Add a Comment

    Sign In With Your Propeller Account

    Forgot your password?

    Please keep your comments relevant to this story.

    To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.

    Submit a Story

    Advertisement

    Story Tags ?

    Hey! If you Sign In, you can add tags to this story!

    Also Dropping This Article

    No one has dropped this story.

    Groups Watching This

    No groups are watching this story. Why not share it with your groups?

    Also Submitted By

    No one else has submitted this story.