Middle class grow fearful about their prospects »

Posted By TechnologyExpert 1 year, 7 months ago in Business & Finance

Growing numbers of middle-class Americans say they are not better off than they were five years ago, reflecting economic pressures amid growing debt, a study released Wednesday shows. Their short-term assessments of personal progress, according to the study, is the worst it has been in almost half a century.

Read Full Story at msnbc.msn.com »

131 Views Share Story 30 Comments Report

Submitted By:
TechnologyExpert

I am Editor-in-Chief at Alice Hill's RealTechNews (http://www.realtechnews.com). I also have my own blog (Tech-Ex) at http://TechnologyExpert.Blogspot.com. Finally ...

Who Also Submitted:
Other Related Articles:

Why not submit a story?

RSS Join the Discussion

+ Add Comment
Showing 77 of 78 Comments (view all)
- Display
  • Neutral
    walden31 year, 7 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    "You don't need a weather man to know which way the wind blows."

    B. Dylan

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    5 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • Neutral
    ETproductions1 year, 7 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    In 1929 before the Great Depression, the concentration of wealth (all assets including money, property, stocks, etc.) in the hands of the richest 1% reached a high of 50%. One percent of the people owned 50% of everything here. The middle class was in shambles. By 1933 when Hoover left office, the Republicans had held the Presidency for all but 12 of the past 44 years.

    The Great Depression brought some equity back to the distribution of wealth and a long run of Democratic rule. The top 1% retained between 25 and 30% of the nation's wealth during that time.

    Beginning with Nixon in 1969, the tide began to turn again. By the end of George W. Bush's term in 2009, the country will have again been under Republican rule for all but 12 of the past 40 years. And concentration of wealth is back to near 50% in the hands of the elite 1%.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    8 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • Neutral
    djrevelky1 year, 7 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    This story has already been posted as have over 50 comments and over 100 votes...why is this one here?

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    2 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • Neutral
    nikkibabe1 year, 7 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    If this is true, Americans are really dumb idiots who deserve it. If not, how can a sane person explain that John McCain is neck and neck with Democrat Obama? All he is offering is 4 more years of Iraq war and rest of Bush policies.

    Unless all sane voters (except hardcore neo conservatives) take the upcoming election as a "revolution" in the making, the middle class is doomed.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    11 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • Neutral
    quackpot1 year, 7 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    Newbie, your focus on denying the obvious is a better approach than recognizing that a problem exists and working to find a solution to it?

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    3 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • Neutral
    Nasty5101 year, 7 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    so cool. I'll try these tips soon. Thank you

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply
    loading loading ...
    • Neutral
      Commodore11 year, 7 months ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      Those damn democrats controlling Congress should do something then. They said they would. What are they doing besides sitting back laughing at the democrats who voted them in? Nothing but collecting their paycheck.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply

      3 Replies

      loading loading ...
    • Neutral
      nikkibabe1 year, 7 months ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      Those who complain about Democrats in Congress are ignorant of the fact that it is 50-50 split in US Senate. A party needs a 65-35 majority to push through legislation especially with a President whose only line is "my way or no way".

      With religion, faith, abortion and gay & lesbian twists that control elections in this country, there is hardly any chance for a "REAL" candidate with solid economic & foreign policies to get elected. Does such a candidate exist?. Hard to tell.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply
      loading loading ...
      • Neutral
        simonsez1 year, 7 months ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        "The analysis did not measure wealth directly. It looked at taxes on capital gains, dividends, interest and rents. Income from securities owned by retirement plans and endowments was excluded, as were gains from noncorporate assets such as personal residences.

        This technique for measuring wealth has long been used in standard economic studies, though critics have challenged that tradition.

        Sounds to me like a typical government measurement. If you don't include personal residences in the mix, you don't have anything remotely close to accurate. For most of us, that is the source of our wealth.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
        Reply

        1 Reply

        loading loading ...
      • Neutral
        simonsez1 year, 7 months ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        The above post popped up in the wrong place of course.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
        Reply
        loading loading ...
        View All 78 Comments

        Add a Comment

        Sign In With Your Propeller Account

        Forgot your password?

        Please keep your comments relevant to this story.

        To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.

        Submit a Story

        Advertisement

        Story Tags ?

        Hey! If you Sign In, you can add tags to this story!

        Real Estate Info

        Get the Latest Market Info for Your Area



        Foreclosures | Short Sale

        Luxury Homes | Homes for Sale

        First Time Home Buyer Advice



        Also Dropping This Article

        No one has dropped this story.

        Groups Watching This

        No groups are watching this story. Why not share it with your groups?

        Also Submitted By

        No one else has submitted this story.