« Back to story "Government says huge oil fields in N.D., Mont."

Story Comments

Posted by: Grrr 1 year, 8 months ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

  • Neutral
    Grrr1 year, 8 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    CON DICTIONARY:

    informed responses = industry propaganda

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply

    4 Replies

    loading loading ...
    • Neutral
      simonsez1 year, 8 months ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      You could have gotten some insight to the problems that exist with energy, but you didn't.

      You advocate solutions that you neither understand or have the training to resolve.

      Try listening and talking less ...

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply

      3 Replies

      loading loading ...
      • Neutral
        Grrr1 year, 8 months ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        That's a crock, you questioning my understanding and training, as if you were anything other than a brainwashed CON shill. By "insights" you are referring to BB's decades old energy industry propaganda? These supposed "insights" are why we still have EXACTLY the same problems NOW that we were facing back in the 70's!!! Those aren't insights, those are EXCUSES. And really old lame ones, at that.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply

        2 Replies

        loading loading ...
        • Neutral
          simonsez1 year, 8 months ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          I went back and reviewed your posts and agree my criticism was unfair. I apologize.

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
          Reply

          1 Reply

          loading loading ...
          • Neutral
            Grrr1 year, 8 months ago

            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

            Dang. Gotta admit, I wasn't expecting that. ; |

            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 7) (recursion depth : 5) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
            Reply
            loading loading ...

    Post Reply

    You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.

    People Who Liked This Comment (0)

    No one voted this comment positively. Is it really that bad of a comment?

    People Who Didn't Like This Comment (0)

    No one voted this comment negatively.

    Submit a Story

    Advertisement

    Story Tags ?

    Hey! If you Sign In, you can add tags to this story!

    Dropping This Article

    No one has dropped this story.

    Groups Watching This

    No groups are watching this story. Why not share it with your groups?

    Also Submitted By

    No one else has submitted this story.