« Back to story "Government says huge oil fields in N.D., Mont."

Story Comments

Posted by: Grrr 1 year, 8 months ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

Neutral
Grrr1 year, 8 months ago

This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

CON DICTIONARY:
informed responses = industry propaganda

(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
Reply
4 Replies

loading ...
- Neutral
  simonsez1 year, 8 months ago
  
  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
  
  You could have gotten some insight to the problems that exist with energy, but you didn't.
  You advocate solutions that you neither understand or have the training to resolve.
  Try listening and talking less ...
  
  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
  Reply
  3 Replies
  
  loading ...
  - Neutral
    Grrr1 year, 8 months ago
    
    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
    
    That's a crock, you questioning my understanding and training, as if you were anything other than a brainwashed CON shill. By "insights" you are referring to BB's decades old energy industry propaganda? These supposed "insights" are why we still have EXACTLY the same problems NOW that we were facing back in the 70's!!! Those aren't insights, those are EXCUSES. And really old lame ones, at that.
    
    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply
    2 Replies
    
    loading ...
    - Neutral
      simonsez1 year, 8 months ago
      
      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
      
      I went back and reviewed your posts and agree my criticism was unfair. I apologize.
      
      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply
      1 Reply
      
      loading ...
      - Neutral
        Grrr1 year, 8 months ago
        
        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
        
        Dang. Gotta admit, I wasn't expecting that. ; |
        
        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 7) (recursion depth : 5) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        0 Replies
        
        loading ...