Story Comments
Posted by: Radiofreeeuropa 1 year, 8 months ago
This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.
-

Radiofreeeuropa1 year, 8 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I'm sorry if you were disappointed, Considerable Sounds focus is really the music aspect of the story, which is in 3 parts. Part one covered up to and including the 1960s. This installment covers 1970 through the 80s. The next installment will cover the 90s until the present (you may find this one more interesting). The background info about book bans is simply that...background. What I think matters here is the change in the methodology of censorship. With the exception of the PMRC, censorship is being conducted through new means that often can not be blamed on government.
Part 1 can be found here:
http://music.propeller.com/story/2007/12/05/con...
Reply-

Radiofreeeuropa1 year, 8 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
(The 3rd installment about contemporary issues is not yet published... but will be soon.) I do sympathize with your experience regarding "I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings" as whether or not a pre-high school student would be a good candidate for reading that one is certainly debatable. Though banning and not making something required reading are different issues entirely.
Reply-

amazed1 year, 8 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I agree that there is a huge difference between not banning something and requiring it to be read. I don't agree that removing stuff from school libraries is the same or even close to actually "banning" a book from, say, the public library or from being sold in your town or county or state-- such as Boston was known for doing up to and including the 1970's. Growing up in Connecticut, as kids, we couldn't believe that it was more than just a slogan.
As far as the other stuff, I guess I have to go back and look at the article again-- I didn't see any of that stuff ,. but I agree that, in many cases, it is the media and the proponents of political correctness that is far more stifling than the government.
Reply
-
-
People Who Didn't Like This Comment (0)
No one voted this comment negatively.
Submit a Story
Advertisement

loading ...
Post Reply
You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.