MIT Scientist smacks down FOX global warming "flip-flop" rumor »

Posted By capn_caveman 1 year, 2 months ago in News

FOX and Friends First host Alisyn Camerota was pumped about a segment that would put another global warming scientist on the FOX side of skeptics and deniers this morning 4/15/08. But her guest, Kerry Emanuel of MIT, promptly burst her bubble and exposed the propaganda in the FOX production.

Read Full Story at newshounds.us »

31 Views Share Story 5 Comments Report

Submitted By:
capn_caveman

I'm an engineer that loves 'anything' science. I'm interested in physics, astronomy, space exploration, Earth sciences, and mathematics to name just a few ...

Other Related Articles:

Why not submit a story?

RSS Join the Discussion

+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 10 (view all)
  • 0%
    panzerv1 year, 2 months ago

    These kind of stories just reinforce my belief that science either does not really know what is going on, or they aren't being allowed to tell us what's really going on. I mean, what if our whole solar system has changed position in the universe, and that has given rise to events that are completely out of our control. If that were so, why wouldn't they tell us? I mean all this going back and fourth crap. Anyone who was in Michigan this winter knows that there was no global warming there. Is global warming selective? Someone needs to give the world a straight answer.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (depth : 1) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    2 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • 0%
    bill29361 year, 2 months ago

    From the article:

    "They've developed a new technique for inferring hurricane activity from global climate data, which doesn't itself contain hurricanes. "

    Translation: We rewrote everything because we were wrong last time.

    "When applied to the past twenty-five years data, it is a startling confirmation of his findings of three years ago; hurricane power has increased by about 50% over the last thirty years."

    Translation: We created a question to fit the answer, and will do the same again when we are shown to be wrong again. So I can get more government money to do studies vice getting a real job.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (depth : 1) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply
    loading loading ...
    • 0%
      CRYMTYPHON1 year, 2 months ago

      A scientist is not a priest or a political pundit.

      It is no shame for them to say 'My old model was wrong, here is a better one'.

      The Foxes assummed he was rejecting the overall hypothosis that CO2 created global warming which causes climate change.

      They were wrong.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (depth : 1) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply

      5 Replies

      loading loading ...
    View All 10 Comments

    Add a Comment

    Sign In With Your Propeller Account

    Forgot your password?

    Please keep your comments relevant to this story.

    To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.

    Advertisement