Story Comments
Posted by: Thinker22 1 year, 8 months ago
This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.
-
Neutral
Thinker221 year, 8 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It ยป
> ...Palestinians saw it [Oslo] merely as the first, conditional step toward peace.
Apparently, this is the reason that even eight years later Arafat REFUSED to include an "end of hostilities" statement in the final agreement, correct?
> Today they still live with no state, no capital in Jerusalem.
No wonder... Both were offered to them in Camp David and later in Taba and consequently rejected by Arafat.
> Israeli forces still occupy much of the West Bank and Gaza Strip...
Yes, and it will continue until the Palestinians will force their leadership to stop violence and ask for peace negotiations. They'll have to realize that the Camp David offers were one time deal that will not be repeated. In August, 2000 most Israelis still believed that the Palestinians were genuinely interested in peace. This is not the case anymore.
...and a "sub-clause" Arafat and Rabin signed in 1992 in no way was a "peace accord" you initially told us about.
Reply
loading ...
People Who Liked This Comment (0)
No one voted this comment positively. Is it really that bad of a comment?
People Who Didn't Like This Comment (0)
No one voted this comment negatively.
Post Reply
You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.