« Back to story "Clinton Wins In Pennsylvania"

Story Comments

Posted by: TimALoftis 1 year, 6 months ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

Neutral
TimALoftis1 year, 6 months ago

This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

at 10:15 eastern her lead has expanded to 10 percentage points with nearly 60% fo the vote in

(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
Reply
16 Replies

loading ...
- Neutral
  SonOfTheMask1 year, 6 months ago
  
  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
  
  Hi Tim! I guess the network news folks are getting faster feeds than the PA Dept of State site that truthi has below...it's still showing less than 50% returns counted and the margin narrowed.
  Guess it ain't over til it's over? :)
  
  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
  Reply
  0 Replies
  
  loading ...
- Neutral
  Aidenag1 year, 6 months ago
  
  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
  
  Cnn is still showing her with the 8pt lead, and now 70% of vote counted.
  
  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
  Reply
  14 Replies
  
  loading ...
  - AlphaGnosisComment removed: Hard Banned13 Replies
    - Neutral
      ybdogsct1 year, 6 months ago
      
      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
      
      ALPHA:
      "Ten points now!"
      And that translates to Hillary Clinton picking up a whopping 6 more delegates than Obama, as if that's going to put a huge dent in Obama's lead. Even as it stands now, Hillary receives an estimated 52 PA delegates and Obama receives an estimated 46 delegates.
      Big deal.
      
      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 7) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply
      11 Replies
      
      loading ...
      - Neutral
        Lurch1 year, 6 months ago
        
        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
        
        AG just wants to see Hillary tear down Obama more, because he knows McCain doesn`t have a chance against Obama on his own.
        
        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 8) (recursion depth : 5) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        10 Replies
        
        loading ...
        
        Neutral
        MacR1 year, 6 months ago
        
        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
        
        You have been told at least a thousand times that AG is a female. But what do you care. As long as you can get your jab in. It is all fair right. Such hypocrites here.
        
        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 9) (recursion depth : 6) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        8 Replies
        
        loading ...
        
        Neutral
        ybdogsct1 year, 6 months ago
        
        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
        
        What does LURCH's comment have to do with hypocrisy?
        And what does ALPHA's gender have to do with the gist of LURCH's comment?
        
        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 10) (recursion depth : 7) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        6 Replies
        
        loading ...
        
        Neutral
        tanglang1 year, 6 months ago
        
        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
        
        Read Lurch's comment again smart guy. Oh, and also, 10% equals a whopping 9 delegates. It was 66 to 57.
        
        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 11) (recursion depth : 8) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        5 Replies
        
        loading ...
        
        Neutral
        ybdogsct1 year, 6 months ago
        
        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
        
        TANG:
        "Read Lurch's comment again smart guy."
        I'll say it again. What does LURCH's comment have to do with "hypocrisy"?
        TANG:
        "Oh, and also, 10% equals a whopping 9 delegates. It was 66 to 57."
        WRONG.
        1) At the time I posted my reply (according to the time-stamp), CNN had projected a 6-delegate difference. That's why I prefaced my comment with the words "Even as it stands now..."
        2) The difference in delegates won is NOT finalized. The final delegate count won't be known for a while longer.
        http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080423/ap_on_el_pr...
        "The final delegate count was delayed because many of Pennsylvania's counties are split into multiple congressional districts. Pennsylvania awards delegates according to the statewide vote as well as the vote in individual congressional districts."
        It's time for you to get your facts straight.
        
        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 12) (recursion depth : 9) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        4 Replies
        
        loading ...
        
        Neutral
        tanglang1 year, 6 months ago
        
        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
        
        "1) At the time I posted my reply (according to the time-stamp), CNN had projected a 6-delegate difference"
        Well that's Your bad for trusting CNN!
        
        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 13) (recursion depth : 10) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        3 Replies
        
        loading ...
        
        Neutral
        ybdogsct1 year, 6 months ago
        
        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
        
        It was a "projection," NOT the final delegate tally. The final delegate tally won't be known for days, which makes your figure WRONG.
        I don't know why this is so difficult for you to comprehend. It is not a tricky concept. Perhaps you should look up the word "projection" in a dictionary. Obviously, English is not your forte.
        
        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 14) (recursion depth : 11) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        2 Replies
        
        loading ...
        
        Neutral
        tanglang1 year, 6 months ago
        
        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
        
        Perhaps you should not have used the smart ass phrase "Hillary Clinton picking up a whopping 6 more delegates than Obama" By your words it would seem as though you were implying that this would be the final tally now would'nt it?
        
        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 15) (recursion depth : 12) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        1 Reply
        
        loading ...
        
        Neutral
        ybdogsct1 year, 6 months ago
        
        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
        
        TANG:
        "Perhaps you should not have used the smart ass phrase "Hillary Clinton picking up a whopping 6 more delegates than Obama" By your words it would seem as though you were implying that this would be the final tally now would'nt it?"
        What part of my sentence that BEGINS with the words "Even as it stands now" do you not understand? Are these monosyllabic words too difficult for you to comprehend?
        
        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 16) (recursion depth : 13) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        0 Replies
        
        loading ...
        
        Neutral
        Lib4Torture4Cons1 year, 6 months ago
        
        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
        
        You have been told at least a thousand times that AG is a female.
        I always thought AG was kind of soft and a bit on the gay side for a guy. Thanks for clearing that up for me.
        
        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 10) (recursion depth : 7) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        0 Replies
        
        loading ...
        
        Neutral
        slate1 year, 6 months ago
        
        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
        
        AG just wants to see Hillary tear down Obama more, because he knows McCain doesn`t have a chance against Obama on his own.
        Do you have a problem with an American supporting any candidate they wish to support for any reason they fell like Lurch?
        
        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 9) (recursion depth : 6) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        0 Replies
        
        loading ...
    - Neutral
      gamahuche1 year, 6 months ago
      
      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
      
      Hee hee what??
      Is your support for Hillary as a fellow woman or as a fellow-manipulator?
      
      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 7) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply
      0 Replies
      
      loading ...