« Back to story "Clinton Wins In Pennsylvania"

Story Comments

Posted by: ybdogsct 1 year, 8 months ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

Neutral
ybdogsct1 year, 8 months ago

This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

TANG:
"Read Lurch's comment again smart guy."
I'll say it again. What does LURCH's comment have to do with "hypocrisy"?
TANG:
"Oh, and also, 10% equals a whopping 9 delegates. It was 66 to 57."
WRONG.
1) At the time I posted my reply (according to the time-stamp), CNN had projected a 6-delegate difference. That's why I prefaced my comment with the words "Even as it stands now..."
2) The difference in delegates won is NOT finalized. The final delegate count won't be known for a while longer.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080423/ap_on_el_pr...
"The final delegate count was delayed because many of Pennsylvania's counties are split into multiple congressional districts. Pennsylvania awards delegates according to the statewide vote as well as the vote in individual congressional districts."
It's time for you to get your facts straight.

(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 12) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
Reply
4 Replies

loading ...
- Neutral
  tanglang1 year, 8 months ago
  
  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
  
  "1) At the time I posted my reply (according to the time-stamp), CNN had projected a 6-delegate difference"
  Well that's Your bad for trusting CNN!
  
  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 13) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
  Reply
  3 Replies
  
  loading ...
  - Neutral
    ybdogsct1 year, 8 months ago
    
    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
    
    It was a "projection," NOT the final delegate tally. The final delegate tally won't be known for days, which makes your figure WRONG.
    I don't know why this is so difficult for you to comprehend. It is not a tricky concept. Perhaps you should look up the word "projection" in a dictionary. Obviously, English is not your forte.
    
    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 14) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply
    2 Replies
    
    loading ...
    - Neutral
      tanglang1 year, 8 months ago
      
      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
      
      Perhaps you should not have used the smart ass phrase "Hillary Clinton picking up a whopping 6 more delegates than Obama" By your words it would seem as though you were implying that this would be the final tally now would'nt it?
      
      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 15) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply
      1 Reply
      
      loading ...
      - Neutral
        ybdogsct1 year, 8 months ago
        
        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
        
        TANG:
        "Perhaps you should not have used the smart ass phrase "Hillary Clinton picking up a whopping 6 more delegates than Obama" By your words it would seem as though you were implying that this would be the final tally now would'nt it?"
        What part of my sentence that BEGINS with the words "Even as it stands now" do you not understand? Are these monosyllabic words too difficult for you to comprehend?
        
        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 16) (recursion depth : 5) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        0 Replies
        
        loading ...