« Back to story "Clinton's win in Pa. leaves Obama battered, party reeling"

Story Comments

Posted by: automan909 1 year, 7 months ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

  • Neutral
    automan9091 year, 7 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    Obama spent 3 times the money as Hillary in Pa and got nailed.

    If she gets the votes from Michigan and Florida to count she will surely win.

    If only America knew Obama at the beginning of the Primaries as they do now who knows how badly he would be behind in this race.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply

    16 Replies

    loading loading ...
    • Neutral
      bobo-in-texas1 year, 7 months ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      Obama wants every vote to count. In all 48 states and Puerto Rico.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply

      9 Replies

      loading loading ...
      • Neutral
        Silverghost1 year, 7 months ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        Quiet Bo! They'll start counting chads! LOL -Rev. S

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply

        7 Replies

        loading loading ...
        • Neutral
          icono11 year, 7 months ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          An' don't forget those pregnant chads.

          Which raises a question; if a chad is pregnant does that count as two votes instead of one?

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
          Reply

          6 Replies

          loading loading ...
          • Neutral
            Silverghost1 year, 7 months ago

            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

            Absolutely! ROTFLMHO! Thanx Icono. : ~ ) -Rev. S

            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 7) (recursion depth : 5) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
            Reply

            5 Replies

            loading loading ...
            • Neutral
              icono11 year, 7 months ago

              This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

              You be welcome silver:)))

              I think it is important to get the pregnant chad issue resolved before the next presidential election;

              Is it a onefer?

              Or is it a twofer?

              (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 8) (recursion depth : 6) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
              Reply

              4 Replies

              loading loading ...
              • Neutral
                HannibalBarca1 year, 7 months ago

                This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                Why????Rep have controlled the WH, congress and the Supreme court for so long yet this issue still stands.

                Now a Senater must come up with an answer....WTF

                (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 9) (recursion depth : 7) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
                Reply

                3 Replies

                loading loading ...
                • Neutral
                  crghss1 year, 7 months ago

                  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                  Nobody "controls" the Supreme court. After all it is a Court.

                  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 10) (recursion depth : 8) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
                  Reply

                  2 Replies

                  loading loading ...
                  • Neutral
                    HannibalBarca1 year, 7 months ago

                    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                    who appoints them ??

                    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 11) (recursion depth : 9) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
                    Reply

                    1 Reply

                    loading loading ...
                    • Neutral
                      crghss1 year, 7 months ago

                      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                      And your point? Remember Souter?

                      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 12) (recursion depth : 10) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
                      Reply
                      loading loading ...
        • Neutral
          DaneL1 year, 7 months ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          It's going to go to the Supreme Court, LOL

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
          Reply
          loading loading ...
        • Neutral
          nostalgia1 year, 7 months ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          But the Super Delegates should know, shouldn't they??

          Unfortunately they don't have the courage to make the decision that needs to be made

          I posted this on another thread but it is enlightening

          Go run the numbers for yourself

          Take a look at the primaries which have already occurred

          Calculate the results based upon winner takes all delegates. Remove the states which are certain to go Republican

          Is it Clinton or Obama who looks like they are more likely to win in the fall?

          Isn't this what the Super Delegates should be doing?

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
          Reply

          2 Replies

          loading loading ...
          • Neutral
            bamababy1 year, 7 months ago

            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

            Super Delegates need to stop being cowards and step up to the plate and declare. It's time for this charade to end and for Senator Clinton to conceed. We need to get geared up for the general elections in the fall, even if by some miracle Senator Clinton got the nomination, we still need a demacratic candidate now. Spend the money towards beating McCain in the fall,instead of beating our own party over the head.

            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
            Reply

            1 Reply

            loading loading ...
            • Neutral
              bobo-in-texas1 year, 7 months ago

              This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

              What an anti-democratic notion.

              (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
              Reply
              loading loading ...
          • Neutral
            bamababy1 year, 7 months ago

            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

            Actually according to research , Senator Obama, if CA, in particular were to revote would decimate Senator Clinton. The More the educated among us hear and understand who Senator Obama is, the more they fall in line behind him. Just look at the way this campaign is being funded and ran, not politics as usual, rather unusual politics. A campaign funded by the people and ran by the people. Rememeber for the people, by the people? It's in the constitution, that nobody has bothered to follow the last how many years. Senator Obama is trying to give the people back their government and allow us to have a say in what happens in our government. Is that what so many are afraid of. This is such a new concept to everyone that it scares them. Take back your government and you take back your rights.

            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
            Reply

            2 Replies

            loading loading ...
            • Neutral
              bobo-in-texas1 year, 7 months ago

              This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

              The usual Wright wing nut talking points.

              (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
              Reply
              loading loading ...

          Post Reply

          You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.

          People Who Liked This Comment (13)

          People Who Didn't Like This Comment (1)

          Submit a Story

          Advertisement

          Story Tags ?

          Hey! If you Sign In, you can add tags to this story!

          Also Dropping This Article

          No one has dropped this story.

          Groups Watching This

          No groups are watching this story. Why not share it with your groups?

          Also Submitted By

          No one else has submitted this story.