« Back to story "Clinton's win in Pa. leaves Obama battered, party reeling"

Story Comments

Posted by: Silverghost 1 year, 8 months ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

Neutral
Silverghost1 year, 8 months ago

This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

Quiet Bo! They'll start counting chads! LOL -Rev. S

(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
Reply
7 Replies

loading ...
- Neutral
  icono11 year, 8 months ago
  
  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
  
  An' don't forget those pregnant chads.
  Which raises a question; if a chad is pregnant does that count as two votes instead of one?
  
  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
  Reply
  6 Replies
  
  loading ...
  - Neutral
    Silverghost1 year, 8 months ago
    
    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
    
    Absolutely! ROTFLMHO! Thanx Icono. : ~ ) -Rev. S
    
    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 7) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply
    5 Replies
    
    loading ...
    - Neutral
      icono11 year, 8 months ago
      
      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
      
      You be welcome silver:)))
      I think it is important to get the pregnant chad issue resolved before the next presidential election;
      Is it a onefer?
      Or is it a twofer?
      
      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 8) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply
      4 Replies
      
      loading ...
      - Neutral
        HannibalBarca1 year, 8 months ago
        
        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
        
        Why????Rep have controlled the WH, congress and the Supreme court for so long yet this issue still stands.
        Now a Senater must come up with an answer....WTF
        
        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 9) (recursion depth : 5) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        3 Replies
        
        loading ...
        
        Neutral
        crghss1 year, 8 months ago
        
        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
        
        Nobody "controls" the Supreme court. After all it is a Court.
        
        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 10) (recursion depth : 6) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        2 Replies
        
        loading ...
        
        Neutral
        HannibalBarca1 year, 8 months ago
        
        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
        
        who appoints them ??
        
        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 11) (recursion depth : 7) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        1 Reply
        
        loading ...
        
        Neutral
        crghss1 year, 8 months ago
        
        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
        
        And your point? Remember Souter?
        
        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 12) (recursion depth : 8) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        0 Replies
        
        loading ...