« Back to story "Rev. Wright Speaks At NAACP Dinner"

Story Comments

Posted by: Blackacereturn 1 year, 8 months ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

  • Neutral
    Blackacereturn1 year, 8 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    tchef - As you may well know most of these guys don't want to hear what the REV has to say. They have found their bone and like a dog they are not giving it up for anything. Their interest is not understanding but polarization, separation and racism. They are raciest and they have found their voice at the behest of the Clinton's (bill Jackson remark). I don't think we should concern ourselves with these people they were never going to vote for him anyway. Their intent now is to convert as many to their raciest views as possible. These very people stood by a republican congress covered up the action of a known child molester and still voted for those members. To me they are in no way qualified to pass judgment on anyone. Rev Right was Quoting the president of Iran when he said "the chicken is coming home to rust" But if you haven't listen to the entire recordings you wouldn't know that.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply

    44 Replies

    loading loading ...
    • Neutral
      DropkickaLib1 year, 8 months ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      Chickens rust? Political commentary of that sort is inappropriate in the course of a sermon, in any case. Stick to the Bible...or run for office.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply

      43 Replies

      loading loading ...
      • Neutral
        Blackacereturn1 year, 8 months ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        there is one misspelling in that entire post and that is what you choose to talk about? Good whatever you got me i cant spell! What a jackass!

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply

        13 Replies

        loading loading ...
        • Neutral
          DropkickaLib1 year, 8 months ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          The entire post was a misspelling. Feel free to call me more names.

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 7) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
          Reply

          12 Replies

          loading loading ...
          • Neutral
            Grrr1 year, 8 months ago

            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

            Okay.

            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 8) (recursion depth : 5) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
            Reply

            11 Replies

            loading loading ...
            • Neutral
              DropkickaLib1 year, 8 months ago

              This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

              As long as you can take it too. Hasn't been my experience with Libs.

              (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 9) (recursion depth : 6) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
              Reply

              10 Replies

              loading loading ...
              • Neutral
                Grrr1 year, 8 months ago

                This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                Libs, or just people you speak derogatorily to in general?

                Cuz I call you a lying intolerant jackass because you are, not because you're a CON shill or because I'm a democratic socialist.

                (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 10) (recursion depth : 7) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
                Reply

                4 Replies

                loading loading ...
                • Neutral
                  DropkickaLib1 year, 8 months ago

                  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                  A socialist is a Marxist by nature and therefore, has a bias against democracy. State ownership of the means of production is not democratic. You are a lying goose-stepping Libbot, blindly following the party line. Socialist want to steal from the successful to give to their political flunkies.

                  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 11) (recursion depth : 8) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
                  Reply

                  3 Replies

                  loading loading ...
                  • Neutral
                    Grrr1 year, 8 months ago

                    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                    Well, it's no surprise that you don't understand the meanings of the words "Marxist", "socialist", or "democracy".

                    What is not democratic about nationalizing some critical industries? Answer is NOTHING. You've confused capitalism with democracy. One is political, the other economic, and they are not mutually exclusive in anyone's book but the greedheads in this country that you so shamelessly shill for.

                    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 12) (recursion depth : 9) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
                    Reply
                    loading loading ...
                    • Neutral
                      Blackacereturn1 year, 8 months ago

                      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                      Drop are you talking about Bush and them because that's what they are doing correct? You are either really young or suffering from some mental illness. I don't mean to make fun of you but most of the things you say are out and out stupid. We all know bush and co are the biggest pilfers in the history of this nation, only they are stealing from the poor to give to their political flunkies. You are off your rockers. I think you are mad. It's only am mad person that would say what you just said!

                      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 12) (recursion depth : 9) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
                      Reply
                      loading loading ...
                  • Neutral
                    Blackacereturn1 year, 8 months ago

                    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                    Take what dropkickaLib , your meaningless myopic buffoonery?. Sure I can, it's very easy for me to ignore fools, since I don't suffer them very well!

                    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 10) (recursion depth : 7) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
                    Reply

                    4 Replies

                    loading loading ...
                    • Neutral
                      DropkickaLib1 year, 8 months ago

                      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                      You ignore fools? Why do you defend Wright then?

                      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 11) (recursion depth : 8) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
                      Reply

                      3 Replies

                      loading loading ...
                      • Neutral
                        Leemck021 year, 8 months ago

                        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                        Drop, my reason is because it is what good Americans do. We may not agree by defend the right to express themselves. Had he said, the Oklahoma bombing was the way, then we have a problem. Remember the Flag Burning flap during Viet Nam? America is still standing, isn't it. Reverend Wright made a conditional statement, for your information. The condition was that if America didn't get it right, then the obvious, don't expect God to Bless America, which is biblical, not to lie or deceive yourself but God Damn America. So, in the end, this is not about defending Reverend Wright, rather it is to educate you my fellow countryman. Do you feel educated now?

                        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 12) (recursion depth : 9) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
                        Reply
                        loading loading ...
                        • Neutral
                          Blackacereturn1 year, 8 months ago

                          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                          It wright is a fool what does that make you?

                          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 12) (recursion depth : 9) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
                          Reply
                          loading loading ...
              • Neutral
                tchef1 year, 8 months ago

                This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                If you listen to the sermon he was warning his congregation about the dangers of seeking revenge. The chickens coming home to roost was a quote from an ambassador being made to Fox news the day after 9/11.

                (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
                Reply

                2 Replies

                loading loading ...
                • Neutral
                  DropkickaLib1 year, 8 months ago

                  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                  Perhaps Saudi Arabaia or Yemen's ambassador?

                  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 7) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
                  Reply

                  1 Reply

                  loading loading ...
                  • Neutral
                    tchef1 year, 8 months ago

                    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                    His name is Ambassador Edward Peck. And he is a retired, white, career U.S. diplomat who served 32-years in the U.S. Foreign Service and was chief of the U.S. mission to Iraq under Jimmy Carter

                    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 8) (recursion depth : 5) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
                    Reply
                    loading loading ...
                • Neutral
                  Dionys1 year, 8 months ago

                  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                  "Political commentary of that sort is inappropriate in the course of a sermon, in any case. Stick to the Bible"

                  The Bible's full of political commentary. Especially the Gospels and in particular Jesus's criticisms regarding the political structure of the time, one very similar to that of the US.

                  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
                  Reply

                  1 Reply

                  loading loading ...
                  • Neutral
                    Grrr1 year, 8 months ago

                    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                    They really like to ignore those chapters and verses regarding throwing the money lenders out of the temple, don't they?

                    Heck, ALL OF REVELATIONS is political commentary on the Roman Empire.

                    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 7) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
                    Reply
                    loading loading ...
                  • Neutral
                    NoWayMan1 year, 8 months ago

                    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                    have you seen hagee's sermons? he preaches armageddon with huge photos of nuke mushroom clouds behind him talking about the end of days and how we have to invade iran.

                    he's straight up crazy.

                    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
                    Reply
                    loading loading ...
                    • Neutral
                      PapaWolf1 year, 8 months ago

                      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                      dropkick

                      >>Chickens rust? Political commentary of that sort is inappropriate in the course of a sermon, in any case. Stick to the Bible...or run for office.

                      Political commentary? That's more of a "you reap what you sow" type of thing - which IS a Biblical reference. As in, "They will be known by the fruits of their labors."

                      So to take his SERMON & try to force it into a political discrediting of a candidate WHO DIDN'T EVEN DELIVER THE SERMON is just STOOOOPID!!!!!

                      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
                      Reply
                      loading loading ...
                      • Neutral
                        Leemck021 year, 8 months ago

                        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                        Dropsky,so you do want to impose on people's rights to speak.

                        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
                        Reply
                        loading loading ...

                    Post Reply

                    You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.

                    People Who Liked This Comment (15)

                    People Who Didn't Like This Comment (6)

                    Submit a Story

                    Advertisement

                    Story Tags ?

                    Hey! If you Sign In, you can add tags to this story!

                    Dropping This Article

                    No one has dropped this story.

                    Groups Watching This

                    No groups are watching this story. Why not share it with your groups?

                    Also Submitted By

                    No one else has submitted this story.