Jewish Palestinian speaks out against 'apartheid state' »

Posted By hyperbola 1 year, 6 months ago in News

His duty, he says, is the same of all persons' worldwide--to mobilize against war crimes perpetrated by governments in citizens' own names. "Not in my name," Davis cries out--a closed hand gesticulating his affront. "Not in my name as an individual and citizen." He raises his voice as loud as he is able to shout. "Not in my

Read Full Story at encyclopedia.com »

76 Views Share Story 4 Comments Report

Submitted By:
hyperbola

Military brat (14th generation American) with unassuaged wanderlust. By age 11, schools in four states and three foreign countries (in 3 languages). Left home at ...

Who Also Submitted:
Other Related Articles:

Why not submit a story?

RSS Join the Discussion

+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 18 (view all)
- Display
  • Neutral
    Edmar141 year, 6 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    There are 55 Moslem countries in the world. 52 of them are text book aparthied states. Women, and non moslems are treated as second and third class citizens. Non Moslims are not permitted to enter Mecca in Saudi Arabia. The Palestinians however are not Israeli citizens and as such are not entitled to the same rights as citizens. That is not aparthied, as aparthied is an afrikaner word that was created to segregate white citizens from non white citizens. Every country has different standards for citizens and non citizens. Hyperbola just happens to miss these little important realities. How convenient!!!!!

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    4 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • Neutral
    Thinker221 year, 6 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    > herding the "subhumans" into Bantusans and pretending not to count them was also a favorite trick of the afrikaners and in this the zionists are no different.

    If you really believe that this is the case, you'll have no troubles to NAME a couple of Israeli "Bantustans" where the Zionists herd those "subhuman christian and moslem citizens of israel" (by the way Israel is A STATE and in English its name should start with a CAPITAL letter, just like a person's name.

    Well, I'm all ears, 'hyperbola'. Can you NAME a couple of these Israeli "Bantustans" where the Zionists herd those "subhuman christian and moslem citizens of israel" if you don't mind?

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    2 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • Neutral
    Thinker221 year, 6 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    Question:

    Can you NAME a couple of these Israeli "Bantustans" where the Zionists herd those "subhuman christian and moslem citizens of israel" if you don't mind?

    Answer:

    > Sure, the prison camp in Gaza is one of the most obvious.

    Well, of course... except that Gaza is NOT IN ISRAEL, 'hyperbola', is it?

    It seems that in addition to your admisssion of having no clue of WHO "Palestinians" were or WHAT was the meaning of "ethnic cleansing" you have no clue of Palestinian georgaphy.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    1 Reply

    loading loading ...
  • Neutral
    Thinker221 year, 6 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    > The UN partition... required that the christian and moslem population NOT be discriminated by the zionists.

    As I've pointed out many times ALL Israeli citizens have exactly the same rights guaranteed by Israeli laws. None of them are discriminated.

    > The immediate ethnic cleansing by zionists in fact invalidates the UN partition.

    The US partition was AN OFFER to end the conflict by creating two states in Palestine. The Jews AGREED to the conditions of the UN offer and the Arabs REJECTED (and by doing it they've, obviously, INVALIDATED it). Further, it was the war against Israel started by the Arabs that caused mass migration of the Arab population, not some mysterious "ethnic cleansing" you're unable to define. People tend to run from battlefields, you know...

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    3 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • Neutral
    Thinker221 year, 6 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    > Time for the one million plus prisoners in Gaza created by zionist ethnic cleansing to return to their homes in Jaffa, Beersheba, the Negev, ... as guaranteed by international human rights law.

    People of Gaza can "return" to any place or state willing to accept them. Israel is not such place. The "international human rights law" guarantees their "right to return" to Israel no more than it guarantees the right of the grandchildren of Germans who once lived in Danzig or East Prussia to "return" to Poland and Russia, respectively.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    1 Reply

    loading loading ...
  • Neutral
    Thinker221 year, 6 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    > If you deny the UN resolutions are appropriate, then the very existence of the israeli state is subject to revision. Certainly its existence as a "jewish" state is unacceptable in the modern world.

    I do not deny the UN Resolutions, the Arabs do. They've rejected the UN Partition Resolution 181 calling for establishment of two states in Palestine, the UN Resolution 242 declaring that EVERY state in the region has the right to exist in safe and secured boundaries and every single UN Resolution based on that UNR242 assumption.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply
    loading loading ...
    • Neutral
      Thinker221 year, 6 months ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      > Certainly its existence as a "jewish" state is unacceptable in the modern world.

      Of course... just as the existence of France as a "french" state, Germany as a "german" state, Spain as a "spanish" state, Japan as a "japanese" state, Russia as a "russian" state as well as the existence of the 21 Arab states.

      If and when the "modern world" will eliminate all these and many other nation-states that are "certainly unacceptable" we'll continue.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply
      loading loading ...
      View All 18 Comments

      Add a Comment

      Sign In With Your Propeller Account

      Forgot your password?

      Please keep your comments relevant to this story.

      To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.

      More News

      Submit a Story

      Advertisement

      Story Tags ?

      Hey! If you Sign In, you can add tags to this story!

      Also Dropping This Article

      No one has dropped this story.

      Groups Watching This

      No groups are watching this story. Why not share it with your groups?

      Also Submitted By

      No one else has submitted this story.