« Back to story " Myanmar death toll now at 4,000"

Story Comments

Posted by: Georgia50 1 year, 7 months ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

  • Neutral
    Georgia501 year, 7 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    I'm all about context. Speaking of which, it was more important for Monica to do Clinton than it was for Clinton to lift a finger for 800,000 Rwandans. In fact, it was ok for Clinton to watch Monica do herself with a cigar while Arafat waited before the world...standing at a microphone alone for 20 minutes. At least, that's what I derive from 90s liberal apologia on behalf of Slick.

    But those 4,000 troops really just somehow got to you, huh? Just yanking your heartstrings, are they? Wow. Bleeding heart liberals bleeding for the troops. (We are certain it has nothing to do with which party supplied the current CIC...wind, nod.)

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply

    3 Replies

    loading loading ...
    • Neutral
      slyboy21 year, 7 months ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      Careful. A storm like this with so many casualties is something nobody can control (though we try out best in prediction and aid). The war on the other hand is something we do have control over.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply
      loading loading ...
      • Neutral
        hamy1 year, 7 months ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        Wow. How wonderfully cooperative you must be to bring your party politics and finger waving attitude into a huge tragedy for another country. Why aren't we being as supportive of them as they were for us? Because the CIC which you seem so proud of doesn't care about anyone who doesn't turn a profit.

        But if you want to be that way, Bush has killed more Americans than the terrorists he is supposedly fighting did on 9-11.

        If you can still support Bush, your opinion is moot anyway.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply

        1 Reply

        loading loading ...
        • Neutral
          slate1 year, 7 months ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          It seems that I saw the first lady talking about the aid we are already sending. Should we not support the good things any president does?

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
          Reply
          loading loading ...

      Post Reply

      You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.

      People Who Liked This Comment (1)

      People Who Didn't Like This Comment (8)

      Submit a Story

      Advertisement

      Story Tags ?

      Hey! If you Sign In, you can add tags to this story!

      Dropping This Article

      No one has dropped this story.

      Groups Watching This

      No groups are watching this story. Why not share it with your groups?

      Also Submitted By

      No one else has submitted this story.