Story Comments
Posted by: Spadecaller 1 year, 6 months ago
This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.
-
Neutral
Spadecaller1 year, 6 months ago
-
PsychoHosebeastComment removed: Spammer, Abusive2 Replies
-
-
Neutral
GWHayduke1 year, 6 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Ah ha.
Here it is:
http://www.pssht.com/biography/rush_limbaugh.html
I got this from one of Goppy's posts.
Reply
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Neutral
mesodude1 year, 6 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
clearly they can, since Bush was elected twice and we may never know how many unborn babies were snuffed out because of his illegal oil grab in Iraq. Sadder still is that cons don't even want to know how many people we've killed. After all, it's not like we went over there to spread democracy or anything. ;-P
Reply
-
-
Neutral
Georgia501 year, 6 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Interesting that you liberals dismiss the court-admissible evidence that Bill Clinton used cocaine often, yet when Limbaugh's legally protected files are made public, personal privacy gets tossed and you're all over the issue of drug use for which topic your opposition is atypical.
At least have the decency to throw us a curve ball once in awhile...you know...like the ACLU did in defending Rush's privacy.
Reply-
-
Neutral
Georgia501 year, 6 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
bubba,
I can't thank you enough for asking. Ok, let's take a stroll down memory lane (or, for you liberals, down convenient amnesia lane).
Remember the drug sting that put Roger Clinton behind bars? Oh you know...the one where Slick's law enforcement cronies sent him a heads up on the federal sting operation so he could dutifully step aside and let his half-brother take the hit? Yeah...that's the one. Roger was convicted by evidence that included a sting operation tape recording. And on that court-admitted recording, Roger stated that Bill snorted cocaine like a Hoover vacuum.
courtroom evidence on your own ---> you refuse to see
Rush's private records breached ---> like white on rice
No, I'm not defending Rush or saying he's without his problems. I am merely observing the selective criticism in here.
Reply-
Neutral
bubba21 year, 6 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I see ... so, what Clinton's brother said about Bill is "gospel truth" and undeniable documentation? And, Roger's sins 'automatically' convict Bill?
Don't think so ...
What courtroom evidence? Got some source links to share?
The evidence on Rush was documented.
The Republicans tried for EIGHT years to "get" Bill Clinton on something, and all they could come up with was lying about sex.
And during those eight years, the Republicans basically ignored the growing threat from Bin Laden and al Qaeda because of their obsession to 'get some dirt' on Bill.
Reply
-
-
-
-
-
-
loading ...
Ciera-Marie
tehranchik
donald51
loverman
PapaWolf
LumFan
Shadowolf
jovial
bubba2
Goppy
mesodude
dunkirk
bruhaha
AntiNeoCon
scott4261
cowboygrandpa
TheRealizer
baddad59
stoutkraut
Wolfie2007
DropkickaLib
Post Reply
You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.