Comments for Republicans Vote Against Moms; No Word Yet on Puppies, Kittens »
Posted By Beau7890 1 year, 6 months ago in NewsIt has long been the custom to compare a popular piece of legislation to motherhood and apple pie. Evidently, that is no longer the standard. Worse, Republicans are now confronted with a John Kerry-esque predicament: They actually voted for motherhood before they voted against it.
Read Full Story at washingtonpost.com »
RSS Join the Discussion
+ Add CommentComments So Far: 35
-
-
-
-
Neutral
Goppy1 year, 6 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Hey, thats pretty ding dang good.
YOu Liburals with your command of the English language and clever turns of phrases.
The only cleverness in us Conservatives comes from the lieks of Rush Limbaugh encouragin Indianans to vote for Hillery.
We Conservatives take much more solace in in-your-face mean spiritedness.
Reply -
-
Neutral
Beau78901 year, 6 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Because all Republicans have Americans' interests in mind in everything they do, and anyone who exposes their fallibility makes America look bad? I hope you're also thinking that showing up Democrats has the same effect,and that you'd think no public officials should be criticized--just out of fairness, then.
Are you saying all 178 Republicans who changed their votes should all be removed?
Reply
-
-
-
Neutral
Goppy1 year, 6 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I agree tangy.
oUr Clever media manipulation and talk radidio domination has so completely succeeded in dupin the American poeple inta believin we are 'the party of conscience' ... we can even vote against MOTHERS without any of us loyal Christian Conservatives battin an eye!
Course, I realize the examples in the artikal dont bear out that we are of exceptional character. Thats a big pill for me to swaller.
I was raised (liek all us Christian Conservatives) that Republicans are filled with honest decorum ... that they get things done ... that they are uniformly morally superior.
It turns out that none of that is true dagnabbit.
In fact, Im beginnin to think this was all propaganda to cover the mindless obstructionism and pervasive moral breakdown of Conservatives throughout the land.
Reply
-
-
-
Neutral
not2needy1 year, 6 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
FTA:
It has long been the custom to compare a popular piece of legislation to motherhood and apple pie. Evidently, that is no longer the standard. Worse, Republicans are now confronted with a John Kerry-esque predicament: They actually voted for motherhood before they voted against it.
This has fairly set a pattern with the way repubs have been doing things for a while.
Reply-
-
raats6662Comment removed: Retracted by user
-
Neutral
splitrch1 year, 6 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Also FTA:
"The majority has taken, once again, their go-it-alone policy," Boehner lamented yesterday. "It's time for Democrats and Republicans to work together."
What a load of crap. Has he forgotten just how bipartisan the pugs were between 1994 and 2006. Has he gone off the deep end or he has seen the light?
Reply
-
-
Neutral
stephen-johnson1 year, 6 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
FTA:
-- On Wednesday afternoon, the House had just voted, 412 to 0, to pass H. Res. 1113, "Celebrating the role of mothers in the United States and supporting the goals and ideals of Mother's Day," when Rep. Todd Tiahrt (R-Kan.), rose in protest.
"Mr. Speaker, I move to reconsider the vote," he announced.
Rep. Kathy Castor (D-Fla.), who has two young daughters, moved to table Tiahrt's request, setting up a revote. This time, 178 Republicans cast their votes against mothers. --
I have nothing against mothers either - but doesn't Congress have anything better to do than this?
Thanks for letting us see how our tax dollars are hard at work, Beau.
Reply-
Neutral
Beau78901 year, 6 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Congress absolutely has better things to do. And this kind of thing goes on all the time. (Though less time would have been wasted if Rep. Tiahrt had just let it go.)
But many votes are for show. When examining a candidate's record, check the roll call in the final vote--the one that's either a bill's last gasp on the floor after amendments have been added, or the one that passes it through to the president. Much carping about candidates' records has to do with votes like this that are essentially meaningless.
Gotta admit the headline's a keeper though, don't you Stephen? ;-)
Reply-
-
-
Neutral
Beau78901 year, 6 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Exactly. And there are some who'll use a vote against that one to try to make some point or other about an opponent in an election. And worse, others who'll believe it means something about the candidate.
(That's in reference to H. Res. 888 designating the first week in May as " 'American Religious History Week' for the appreciation of and education on America's history of religious faith.")
Reply-
libsRfunnyComment removed: Hard Banned4 Replies
-
-
-
-
-
-
Neutral
bruhaha1 year, 6 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
"The majority has taken, once again, their go-it-alone policy," Boehner lamented yesterday. "It's time for Democrats and Republicans to work together."
When the Republicans were in the majority, they did whatever they wanted, excluded democrats from meetings, threatened the "nuclear option," etc., etc....what hypocrites.
Reply -
-
-
lovermanComment removed: Retracted by user
-
-
-
-
Neutral
Beau78901 year, 6 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
This one was real too, though it wasn't labeled that way:
http://www.theonion.com/content/news/nations_po...
Reply
-
-
-
-
Neutral
Spadecaller1 year, 6 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
An embarassing waste of time. I can't applaud the introduction of a an irrelevant bill that is not about the business of governing. The Senate's bipartisan mob of indulgent clowns are neglecting the dire concerns of our nation.
Speaking of motherhood, I must wonder if our senators were actually weaned; perhaps they were hatched and lack the experience of an intimate motherhood experience. They certainly behave more like egglaying reptiles showing little concern for those in their care.
Reply -
PsychoHosebeastComment removed: Spammer, Abusive
-
-
SwampFox-82ndComment removed: Retracted by user
loading ...
Add a Comment
Sign In With Your Propeller Account
Please keep your comments relevant to this story.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.