« Back to story "Obama defends his patriotism, quarrels with McCain "

Story Comments

Posted by: UnusualSuspect 1 year, 6 months ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

Neutral
UnusualSuspect1 year, 6 months ago

This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

Quite a difference in speaking the words and listening to them. I did say he should be pushing his dream, not Wright's, didn't I?
He's already come out against Rev Wright...what more do you want? If it's a perfect human being, well, sorry. Clinton wasn't perfect, Bush sure as hell isn't.
I'm pushing for the one that comes the closest to making America better in the long. Hopefully, Obama will fill the bill...

(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 8) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
Reply
20 Replies

loading ...
- Global_WarmerComment removed: Abusive19 Replies
  - ML2007Comment removed: Retracted by user18 Replies
    - Global_WarmerComment removed: Abusive17 Replies
      - Neutral
        questionseverything1 year, 6 months ago
        
        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
        
        the only way mccain can win is to rig the election....just like the last 2
        richard phillip hayes has a new book out that details the election theft in ohio in 2004 and of course lance dehaven smith proved yrs ago that gore won florida so with neo cons like warmer bragging that they will do it again...we better get a plan folks
        call ur congressmen and demand paper ballots!!
        
        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 12) (recursion depth : 5) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        7 Replies
        
        loading ...
        
        Global_WarmerComment removed: Abusive6 Replies
        
        Neutral
        questionseverything1 year, 6 months ago
        
        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
        
        its true its harder to unite when so many dif groups r represented by the dems but its way better than having a party that only represents rich white guys
        
        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 14) (recursion depth : 7) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        4 Replies
        
        loading ...
        
        Global_WarmerComment removed: Abusive3 Replies
        
        Neutral
        not2needy1 year, 6 months ago
        
        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
        
        EGAD!
        
        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 16) (recursion depth : 9) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        2 Replies
        
        loading ...
        
        Global_WarmerComment removed: Abusive1 Reply
        
        Global_WarmerComment removed: Abusive
        
        Neutral
        Shadowolf1 year, 6 months ago
        
        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
        
        Global Warmer seems to have been inhaling his own farts...yep;he has assumed the NeoConArtist Position!!!
        
        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 14) (recursion depth : 7) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        0 Replies
        
        loading ...
      - Neutral
        UnusualSuspect1 year, 6 months ago
        
        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
        
        You'll wake up November 5 with a new President alright, just not a Republican...LOL...
        
        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 12) (recursion depth : 5) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        8 Replies
        
        loading ...
        
        Global_WarmerComment removed: Abusive7 Replies
        
        Neutral
        scott42611 year, 6 months ago
        
        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
        
        Yes, we SURE WILL! I hope all you nutjobs will be OK on November 5th, 'cause you are in for a very rude awakening (It'll make your shock over 2006 seem like a day at the beach!).
        
        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 14) (recursion depth : 7) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        6 Replies
        
        loading ...
        
        Global_WarmerComment removed: Abusive5 Replies
        
        ML2007Comment removed: Retracted by user
        
        Neutral
        scott42611 year, 6 months ago
        
        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
        
        Neither. And you would know that if you'd been paying attention to my posts over the last year or so...
        I'm simply a hard working American who is struggling to hang on to his piece of the shrinking middle class. I'm fortunate in that I have the education and skills to have a decent job.
        And ya know, your perception of me doesn't really matter to me one iota. The fact that you perceive those of us who are liberal or progressive as welfare recipients or government employees simply underscores your own ignorance.
        
        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 16) (recursion depth : 9) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        3 Replies
        
        loading ...
        
        Global_WarmerComment removed: Abusive2 Replies
        
        Neutral
        scott42611 year, 6 months ago
        
        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
        
        And tell me this: Why should the CEO of the company I work for pay a smaller percentage of his income in taxes than I do? And why should any company be given the tax loopholes they have today? This income is not given to employees as raises... though they should, most companies will take this as an opportunity to increase the bottom line for their investors while continuing to pay their employees the bare minimum the market will bear. And through this process the rich continue to get richer while the poor continue to get poorer and the middle class disappears into oblivion.
        ...and THAT is the major flaw of trickle down economics. I believe that the country performs much better when all boats are lifted. That is the root of Franklin Roosevelt's philosophy and the basis for my politics.
        
        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 18) (recursion depth : 11) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        1 Reply
        
        loading ...
        
        Global_WarmerComment removed: Abusive
        
        Neutral
        scott42611 year, 6 months ago
        
        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
        
        Actually that's NOT true and it hasn't been true since Reagan was president. And it has never REALLY been true, because the 90% figure didn't kick in until income passed a certain amount. The real marginal rate is higher for the rich, because itemized deductions gradually evaporate as one moves up the income ladder.
        This as it should be. But you are so wed to the Reagan-BushII economic philosophy that I don't believe you can possibly see the flaws (of which there are many...), not the least of which is the destruction of the American middle class.
        
        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 20) (recursion depth : 12) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        0 Replies
        
        loading ...