Story Comments
Posted by: Endoscopy 1 year, 7 months ago
This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.
-
Neutral
Endoscopy1 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I agree that testing should be done.
"men still wants to do it in the search of high profits by powerful corporations."
Not only bad grammar but I get tired of blaming everything on corporate greed. The scientists are trying to create crops that will grow under bad conditions. Raised from a farm I know first hand the problems farmers face. They work very hard getting the land ready to plant. They plant their crops and work the fields to give the crop the best chance to grow. Then they are at the mercy of the weather. Too much rain, not enough rain, cold snap early or late, too hot, etc. Way back using a strain of winter wheat helped in a lot of cases. The yield per acre is where the farmer can make a profit or go bust. Too many bad years in a row and the farmer loses his farm. This is the problem scientists are trying to solve.
Remember that your food comes from the farmers and the small ones are being driven out of business slowly because of this.
Reply-
Neutral
cowboygrandpa1 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Endoscopy:
Thats not the only reason the independant farmer is going out of business.
My cousin in Iowa has her farm with her husband. They work two jobs plus farm. The cost of equipment and the corporate takeover of farming have raised the cost of doing business.
Corporate owners could care less about the land. They want their profits.
Reply -
Neutral
quackpot1 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I can appreciate your suspicion of seed monopolies that will determine what you plant and how much you will pay for seed.
I can appreciate your independence in wanting to plant what YOU want vs. what Argibusiness needs to make a profit on via it's patented seed.
I can appreciate your delima of proifits today at the cost of MUCH higher pesticide costs tomorrow.
I can appreciate you delima of risking a disaster due to all farms having the same seed as opposed to seed diversity.
Reply -
Neutral
Natureboy1 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
"This is the problem scientists are trying to solve."
Unfortunately, they are arrogantly trying to solve it with their own technology instead of observing and learning from mother nature.
Nothing goes south like a genetic monoculture, and nothing is less natural. We should be encouraging genetic diversity, and encouraging farmers to cultivate a diversity of crops.
Reply-
Neutral
tkyrchncs1 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Every loaf of bread is a monoculture of yeast, every corn field is a monoculture, the cattle and pigs that need ear tags to be told one from another virtually the same. We only cultivate the plants and animals we want, and we select for the traits in those that we want, and we have been doing this for thousands of years. The only difference here is that rather than wait for mutations or coincidence of traits is that we are inserting the desired traits directly. What a bunch of alarmists. We cannot go back to a hunter-gatherer type of existence with our population. I am all for plants that resist disease and insects, and pigs that can produce human clotting factor, and I want a cat that glows in the dark. Sheesh, stable your oxen, boys and girls, and move into the 21st century.
Reply-
Neutral
Natureboy1 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Back to biology 101.
If you were to examine a conventionally cultivated field of corn, you would find astonishing genetic diversity, diversity which is eliminated by genetically uniform Monsanto GMO crops. This genetic diversity allows for evolution and adaptation - a pest or blight may wipe out some of the corn, but the survivors will likely be resistant.
Genetic monocultures don't have that going on. What kills some will likely kill all, resulting not in partial crop losses but rather catastrophic crop failures.
Beyond that, growing vast areas of one crop is not smart. Plants grow naturally in ecosystems in which diverse species play complimentary roles. Growing one crop, year after year, depletes the soil and makes necessary the use of a host of petroleum derived pesticides, herbicides and fertilizers.
Reply-
Neutral
tkyrchncs1 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
If you look at any field of any grain planted by a farmer in the last hundred years or so you are looking at a genetic monoculture, whether the farmer bought or saved seed. The varieties we use in agriculture are, and have been for a long time, nearly genetically identical, within the variety. There is virtually no diversity plant to plant in any relatively modern grain field, unless it was introduced diversity for hybrid-producing purposes. Back to AG 101. Blights are almost uniformly infective in any given field, or almost non-infective. Almost, because there are rare genetic events. Compared to a natural wild population, grain fields might as well be the same individual. (except there is no wild population of corn) As to the ecology of it, you're preaching to the choir. My bachelor's degree is a double major biology and art.
Reply
-
-
-
-
Neutral
rumple4skin1 year, 7 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Endoscopy, I want to comment on your comment: Most Americans have not had the 'pleasure' of working on a farm. It's hard work and machinery is expensive. I do not understand the point you were making however well you presented farm conditions. I would not want to be beholden to corporate seed-mongers for next years seed supply. I would not want to have to buy gallons of chemicals to germinate my seeds. I only wish the very best for small farms and hope they can form a united front to combat what appears to be a corporate drive-by shooting.
Reply
-
loading ...
bill2936
canadianrancher57
tkyrchncs
Wolfie2007
Shadowolf
Post Reply
You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.