« Back to story "New bin Laden message coming on Israel: monitor"

Story Comments

Posted by: vor 1 year, 5 months ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

Neutral
vor1 year, 5 months ago

This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

Clinton gave that a try on August 19th, 1998 but received nothing but condemnation (he was "Wagging the Dog", he blew up an aspirin factory!). He almost got OBL. Never gets any credit for the attempt.
As for your question. If he is in fact dead, yes, it does make a difference. And if that is the case who is speaking on these mysterious messages that seem to be so well timed. Because of his apparent operational ineffectiveness (living high in the mountains with no electronic communication) it should take days, even weeks, for him to get a message out of Waziristan.

(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
Reply
7 Replies

loading ...
- Global_WarmerComment removed: Abusive5 Replies
  - libsRfunnyComment removed: Hard Banned
  - Neutral
    vor1 year, 5 months ago
    
    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
    
    That is purely your revisionist history and of course it is totally incorrect and deceptive. Are you an IDIOT! And some other f-ckin' idiot gave you a positive as well! You revisionists will not take over this world. Orwell warned us about you long ago. You would however make a good employee at the Ministry of Truth...you are the type of American that is destroying this country...slowly but surely...
    
    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply
    3 Replies
    
    loading ...
    - Global_WarmerComment removed: Abusive
    - Neutral
      nostalgia1 year, 5 months ago
      
      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
      
      Have you read "Dereliction of Duty: The Eyewitness Account of How Bill Clinton Compromised National Security" by Lt. Col Robert Patterson
      The account in the book was disputed by Sandy Berger
      We all know what a credible source Berger is, right?
      
      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 7) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply
      1 Reply
      
      loading ...
      - Neutral
        vor1 year, 5 months ago
        
        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
        
        Yes, I have read that book. It is purely a biased account of the Clinton presidency. Anyone with the nickname "Buzz" has to be taken somewhat lightly. I have plenty of issues with the way Clinton conducted himself. Ignoring OBL is not one of them.
        The fact that Clinton actually took action against OBL seems to completely escape the both of you. As does the fact that Bush/Cheney seem not the least bit concerned by his continued existence. You are living in a world of smoke and mirrors.
        
        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 8) (recursion depth : 5) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        0 Replies
        
        loading ...