« Back to story "Mixed Feelings About Gay Marriage in California?"

Story Comments

Posted by: tanglang 1 year, 7 months ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

  • Neutral
    tanglang1 year, 7 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    You may think it is right, but it is not A right. A big argument that I hear quite often from gays on tv as to why they should be allowed to marry is tax and insurance benefits. Here is my opinion on that. Insurance, fine. Everyone should be allowed to insure their families, partners, kids hell, even friends. If one of my friends is out of work and I want to add them to my private insurance, so be it. I pay for it.

    My other opinion is that the federal government should not give marriage tax breaks to couples who are not capable of reproducing and therefore not contributing to society in the same way as hetero families do. Shd they be allowed to adopt? Maybe. I feel children are better off with two parents of opposite sex so I am undecided there. Should they be given tax breaks for adopting and raising a kid? Sure, why not? The feds should give breaks to anyone raising a child so that person has more money to invest in said child. Just my thoughts.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply

    2 Replies

    loading loading ...
    • Neutral
      lvrofwolves1 year, 7 months ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      Tanglang- so you think that anybody that can produce children is contributing to society?

      I'm one of those who respect people who choose not to bring more people into the world, or adopt, or just have 1-2 children.

      Also the reason I got married and the reason everyone I know got married was because they loved each other, they were couples. Then comes the decision to have children or not, if you choose not to, it doesn't make your marriage or love any less valid then anyone else. Anyone can be a good contribution to society, surely not everyone is, regardless if they can reproduce or not.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply

      1 Reply

      loading loading ...
      • Neutral
        tanglang1 year, 7 months ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        My point is that the government rewards couples who reproduce. They always have. Especially in places like Alaska. If people who will not reproduce are going to be given benefits the same than why not give them to everybody?

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        loading loading ...

    Post Reply

    You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.

    People Who Liked This Comment (2)

    People Who Didn't Like This Comment (0)

    No one voted this comment negatively.