« Back to story "NASA finds statistical evidence of global warming"

Story Comments

Posted by: quackpot 1 year, 6 months ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

Neutral
quackpot1 year, 6 months ago

This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

Studies such as this AND the current cost of petroleum are TWO good reasons for promoting large increases in energy conservation.
--Rethinking car size
--Rethinking the increased cost of energy efficient auto designs
--Rethinking the distance between work and home
--Rethinking mass transit options
--Rethinking the Nation's rail system vs highway system for hauling goods
--Rethinking temperatures inside of buldings (why do executives need to wear coats in the summer?)
--Rethinking the cost of improving energy conservation in older as well as new buildings.
The nation also needs to increase the amount spent on energy research and development.

(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
Reply
5 Replies

loading ...
- Neutral
  Radiofreeeuropa1 year, 6 months ago
  
  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
  
  This would inconvenience the fat pigs rolling in personal profits at expense of 99% of the people in the world!
  We can't have that!
  
  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
  Reply
  0 Replies
  
  loading ...
- Neutral
  Ciera-Marie1 year, 6 months ago
  
  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
  
  quackpot I would like to add to you list windows on new homes that are being built. Or installing windows, energy efficent ones, to reduce energy costs. Insultating ones home (you don't the traditional pink fiberglass either.).
  
  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
  Reply
  1 Reply
  
  loading ...
  - Neutral
    quackpot1 year, 6 months ago
    
    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
    
    I agree, ciera; that was supposed to be part of my last item.
    
    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply
    0 Replies
    
    loading ...
- Neutral
  texasphotoman1 year, 6 months ago
  
  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
  
  If they would move that warehouse closer to my home then I would no have to drive so far. I guess tother would make up the difference in what I save.
  The train cares goods to the places the tracks go. They have pulled up miles of tracks to the rural area. Only will put a train at an grain port where they can load at least 100 cars. Alot of farm grain ports don't have that capacity.
  
  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
  Reply
  1 Reply
  
  loading ...
  - Neutral
    quackpot1 year, 6 months ago
    
    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
    
    yep - time to rethink the nations transportation system prehaps!
    
    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply
    0 Replies
    
    loading ...

Post Reply

You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.

People Who Liked This Comment (17)

People Who Didn't Like This Comment (0)

No one voted this comment negatively.

Submit a Story

Advertisement