« Back to story "Prominent neoconservative PNAC website goes under"

Story Comments

Posted by: jordan11 1 year, 7 months ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

Neutral
jordan111 year, 7 months ago

This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_for_a_New_...
AH YES, the CONS who tried to get Clinton to depose Hussein.

(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
Reply
9 Replies

loading ...
- libsRfunnyComment removed: Hard Banned8 Replies
  - libsRfunnyComment removed: Hard Banned7 Replies
    - libsRfunnyComment removed: Hard Banned6 Replies
      - libsRfunnyComment removed: Hard Banned5 Replies
        
        libsRfunnyComment removed: Hard Banned4 Replies
        
        libsRfunnyComment removed: Hard Banned3 Replies
        
        libsRfunnyComment removed: Hard Banned2 Replies
        
        libsRfunnyComment removed: Hard Banned1 Reply
        
        Neutral
        bubba21 year, 7 months ago
        
        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
        
        What an amazing display of pathetic SPIN.
        You dredge out OLD statements from the Clinton administration to try to put the blame on THEM for BUSH's invasion of Iraq?
        Erroneous and lame.
        BUSH ordered the invasion, after HE and Rumsfeld and Cheney and Rice filled the nation's heads full of lies about the "threat" from Saddam.
        There was NO threat - period.
        TWO investigations by the REPUBLICAN-controlled Senate in 2005-2006 proved that all of the reasons used to go to war were FALSE.
        And, a huge Pentagon report released earlier this year also proves that ALL of the reasons used by Bush and his cronies to invade Iraq were FALSE.
        
        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 11) (recursion depth : 10) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        0 Replies
        
        loading ...