« Back to story "Propeller Week In Review: May 17, 2008"

Story Comments

Posted by: libsRfunny 1 year, 5 months ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

libsRfunnyComment removed: Hard Banned16 Replies
- Neutral
  BronxBomber1 year, 5 months ago
  
  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
  
  Man! Jovial did a great job posting that article.
  :oD
  
  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
  Reply
  8 Replies
  
  loading ...
  - Neutral
    Spadecaller1 year, 5 months ago
    
    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
    
    BB... I agree. Jovial's hosting of that story was well done.
    
    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply
    7 Replies
    
    loading ...
    - Neutral
      Mdiar1 year, 5 months ago
      
      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
      
      You aren't so great at the spamming thing, are you? Who would want to see Cindy McCain naked? And to spam a story by JamesMarcus, now that HAS to be the height of idiocy!
      
      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply
      5 Replies
      
      loading ...
      - Neutral
        Mdiar1 year, 5 months ago
        
        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
        
        Not a reply to SC, was a reply to the spammer previously here!
        
        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 5) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        4 Replies
        
        loading ...
        
        Neutral
        JamesMarcus1 year, 5 months ago
        
        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
        
        That individual has left the building.
        
        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 7) (recursion depth : 6) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        3 Replies
        
        loading ...
        
        Neutral
        Mdiar1 year, 5 months ago
        
        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
        
        Perhaps to the back of the spam class?
        
        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 8) (recursion depth : 7) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        2 Replies
        
        loading ...
        
        Neutral
        JamesMarcus1 year, 5 months ago
        
        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
        
        Enrolled in a remedial SEO workshop.
        
        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 9) (recursion depth : 8) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        1 Reply
        
        loading ...
        
        Neutral
        BronxBomber1 year, 5 months ago
        
        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
        
        Of course, Mdiar isn't talking to me as I never had a problem with him.
        
        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 10) (recursion depth : 9) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        0 Replies
        
        loading ...
- Neutral
  ind061 year, 5 months ago
  
  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
  
  "So many fools on here are too quick to fall for BS because they LOVE a conspiracy."
  Well then thank God that you're here to shine your wisdom on us mortals and set us all straight!
  
  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
  Reply
  3 Replies
  
  loading ...
  - Neutral
    Spadecaller1 year, 5 months ago
    
    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
    
    "For something to be 'subliminal,' you cannot have conscious awareness."
    ... then libsRfunny must know a lot about "subliminal".
    
    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply
    1 Reply
    
    loading ...
    - Neutral
      Goppy1 year, 5 months ago
      
      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
      
      Too funny!
      
      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply
      0 Replies
      
      loading ...
  - Neutral
    gamahuche1 year, 5 months ago
    
    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
    
    "Shining his wisdom"..
    Oh Ind, in-deed what a genteel way to put it!
    I know that in your pure world of exquisite humour you never indulge in any tongue-in-cheek or nudge-nudge, wink-wink.
    Such a benevolent POV does you everlasting credit.
    
    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply
    0 Replies
    
    loading ...
- Neutral
  GLee1 year, 5 months ago
  
  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
  
  Atta girl Cindy!!
  MAC IN '09!!
  
  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
  Reply
  0 Replies
  
  loading ...
- Neutral
  hdthehn1 year, 5 months ago
  
  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
  
  Libs-
  Do you have evidence proving that it was a feke or should we just trust your word as we trust George W. (GOT WMD) Bush?
  
  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
  Reply
  1 Reply
  
  loading ...
  - Neutral
    MRCOFFEECAKE1 year, 5 months ago
    
    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
    
    Hmmm..Why would anyone be defending a television network over such an innocuous and minor story, unless of course the "fair and balanced" network is truly their own personal unfair and imbalanced forum for misrepresentation? All the remaining neo-cons must hold them so near and dear to their heart that
    they find any criticism of "their" dear Fox painful..Hmmm.
    let's keep it up. We've gotten them out of the closet!
    Let's keep assaulting the Fox Propaganda network and put them on the defensive so they can stop this inexcusable assault on truthful media by blasting them all with liberal machine guns..
    
    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply
    0 Replies
    
    loading ...

Post Reply

You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.

People Who Liked This Comment (11)

People Who Didn't Like This Comment (11)

Submit a Story

Advertisement