« Back to story "Karl Rove's sly deal with Fox"

Story Comments

Posted by: tchef 1 year, 6 months ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

Neutral
tchef1 year, 6 months ago

This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

Anyone who votes for the continuation of the failed policies of this administration or supports and defends this administration are truly the ones who should be called idiots.

(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
Reply
19 Replies

loading ...
- Neutral
  slate1 year, 6 months ago
  
  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
  
  Anyone who really thinks the last two elections were stolen are the idiots, regardless of the misguided way the Bush administration has handled things.
  
  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
  Reply
  18 Replies
  
  loading ...
  - Neutral
    markmawn21 year, 6 months ago
    
    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
    
    That's easy for the receiving end of the theft to say. Who will the Supreme Court be there for this time d'ya think?
    
    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply
    2 Replies
    
    loading ...
    - Neutral
      slate1 year, 6 months ago
      
      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
      
      I suppose the Dems that won the last election cycle by a close margin stole it?
      
      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 7) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply
      1 Reply
      
      loading ...
      - Neutral
        markmawn21 year, 6 months ago
        
        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
        
        Nope, but if the Dems used Rove tactics, they would have landslid it.
        
        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 8) (recursion depth : 5) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        0 Replies
        
        loading ...
  - Neutral
    walden31 year, 6 months ago
    
    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
    
    Slate-
    I generally respect your opinion, but you are uninformed on this one.
    From Vanity Fair-
    http://makethemaccountable.com/articles/The_Pat...
    From the US Commission on Civil Rights-
    http://www.usccr.gov/pubs/vote2000/report/main.htm
    About Ohio 2004-
    http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/10432334...
    There I did some legwork for you.
    
    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply
    9 Replies
    
    loading ...
    - Neutral
      not2needy1 year, 6 months ago
      
      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
      
      Why do i think that he won't even bother to look at those links walden3? Well, for one, they never do.
      
      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 7) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply
      2 Replies
      
      loading ...
      - Neutral
        walden31 year, 6 months ago
        
        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
        
        You can lead a horse to water, but two in the bush is a stitch in time.
        
        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 8) (recursion depth : 5) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        0 Replies
        
        loading ...
      - SwampFox-82ndComment removed: Retracted by user
    - SwampFox-82ndComment removed: Retracted by user
    - Neutral
      slate1 year, 6 months ago
      
      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
      
      I looked up plenty of links that said otherwise Walden,, you don't have to respect me, that's ok I'll sleep well. THe problem with people on these sites is that they only want others to believe exactly the things they do or they are the enemy or stupid. What a boring way to live one's life.
      Besides I have so much fun seeing you guys freak out.
      
      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 7) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply
      1 Reply
      
      loading ...
      - Neutral
        VMan1 year, 6 months ago
        
        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
        
        Yeah, they think everyone is either with them or against them. What a ridiculous mindset. Now, I seem to remember someone else saying they felt that way. 'must've been some other "idiot".
        
        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 8) (recursion depth : 5) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        0 Replies
        
        loading ...
    - Neutral
      MRCOFFEECAKE1 year, 6 months ago
      
      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
      
      Vanity fair, Rolling Stone, Robert Kennedy Jr.,
      even Walter Cronkite and Lou Dobbs..They're ALL Commies.
      Or is it appeasers, or is it liberals??
      Either way
      Whatever..
      Why do you quote all of those anti-American sources?
      They still think Oswald wasn't Kennedy's assassin,
      The Gulf of Tonkin was fabricated and Pat Tillman
      was killed by friendly fire..Oh, forget those last 2.
      
      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 7) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply
      0 Replies
      
      loading ...
    - Neutral
      kctrixter1 year, 6 months ago
      
      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
      
      checkout HBO's Hacking Democracy
      
      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 7) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply
      1 Reply
      
      loading ...
      - Neutral
        MRCOFFEECAKE1 year, 6 months ago
        
        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
        
        It will be a classic for years to come.
        
        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 8) (recursion depth : 5) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        0 Replies
        
        loading ...
  - SwampFox-82ndComment removed: Retracted by user2 Replies
    - Neutral
      MRCOFFEECAKE1 year, 6 months ago
      
      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
      
      unfortunately slate laid low for a while but has returned
      to the dark side. This is not a conservative/liberal issue and slate is jumping in to give backdoor support to what we were all hoping could go away quickly (the sad Bush legacy)
      I'm disappointed.
      
      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 7) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply
      0 Replies
      
      loading ...
    - Neutral
      cushi1 year, 6 months ago
      
      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
      
      You are waaaay COOL, SwampFox82nd!
      
      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 7) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply
      0 Replies
      
      loading ...
  - Neutral
    tchef1 year, 6 months ago
    
    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
    
    When did I say anything about stolen elections?
    
    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply
    0 Replies
    
    loading ...
  - Neutral
    MRCOFFEECAKE1 year, 6 months ago
    
    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
    
    Why does America monitor the elections in other nations?
    To prevent fraud??
    Who monitors OUR elections?? ...No one.. How arrogant!
    The Supreme Court of Cal. overrules the wishes of the voters and there is outrage last week on gay marriage, but when your precious Reagan/Bush Supreme Court stops the vote count it's perfectly fine that they vote 5-4 on their party line to end a full vote count.
    Be consistent, will you? THEY WERE BOTH WRONG..
    
    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply
    0 Replies
    
    loading ...

Post Reply

You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.

People Who Liked This Comment (27)

People Who Didn't Like This Comment (1)

libsRfunny

Submit a Story

Advertisement