Iran 'withholds nuclear details' »
Posted By monte-g 1 year, 5 months ago in NewsThe UN nuclear watchdog has said it believes Iran is still withholding information on its nuclear programme.
Read Full Story at news.bbc.co.uk »
342 Views Share Story 43 Comments Report
Submitted By:
monte-g
Hi
You never lose by loving. You always lose by holding back.
I don’t know what the key to success is, but the key ...
Other Related Articles:
Why not submit a story?
RSS Join the Discussion
+ Add CommentShowing 267 of 295 Comments (view all)
-
Neutral
Dicax_Maximus1 year, 5 months ago
-
Neutral
DropkickaLib1 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Haven't you been reading the posts from the Libs around here? Iran is only engaged in peaceful nuclear weapons research in response to U.S. imperialism. They don't really intend to nuke Isreal, and they're all evil zionists in any case, so why should we care? We will have to rub their appeasing noses in this one!
Reply -
wasntmeComment removed: Abusive
-
Neutral
injest1 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
So does this mean Olbermoron was wrong again?
http://news.aol.com/newsbloggers/2007/12/07/olb...
Reply
-
-
-
Neutral
mesodude1 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
No! You're wrong! It's only a matter of supply and demand!!! If you far left extremist America-hating, tree-hugging, libbies would just let us drill for oil "in our own back yard," (says a lot about what we think of Alaska, huh?), we would stop invading other countries on a whim to protect our "interests" (*cough* oil) and ExxonMobil CEOs would agree to charge us less ('cause, ya know, they're just charitable that way) and accept a couple million dollars less in retirement and pension.
Reply -
Neutral
TheRealizer1 year, 5 months ago
-
Neutral
BB641 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
No, I don't. Been to war. Didn't much care for it. That being said, I think it should be made very clear to Iran that a nuclear strike by them or any of their terror network partners would mean the destruction of their entire nation. I don't think it will stop them, if they get a weapon they'll use it, but it makes it clear what will happen. Russia, China, France, Germany and the rest of our "friends" can't claim they don't understand. All have helped arm Iran over the years and all may have to answer for selling restricted materials to Iran. Especially if the UN, which means the US and UK are forced to stop them.
I pray for peace but for some reason the leaders of Iran seem bent on creating nukes. I don't get it. No one is challenging them. No one is moving armies in to strike them. If they claim the US is, that would be wrong, we're seeing a constant draw down in Iraq. It's small but it's continuing to happen. Iran doesn't play by normal rules.
Reply
-
-
Neutral
Mutainia1 year, 5 months ago
-
wasntmeComment removed: Abusive32 Replies
-
Neutral
Mutainia1 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
You mean the leader of Iran DOESN'T believe in the 12th Imam who supposedly disappeared down a well? DOESN'T want to sacrifice most of Iran to eliminate Israel? Then again, since you are a Muslim who, no doubt, believes you can lie to spread Islam (thanks to surahs 3:28 and 16:106), EVERYthing you say is hard to believe. Sorry. NOT your fault, wasntme, Quran's fault.
Reply
-
-
Neutral
HannibalBarca1 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
PNAC explains a lot, more than some of the comments here, and that was what 1992, and look who got the control of the WH....PNAC.
Only trouble is Iraq, which was to be over in 2-3 months threw a hook into that gambit, didn't it.
Yes it is about oil. not so much to get it to N America but more to keep it from China, your next opponent.
Remember the Chinese sub and the Kitty Hawk a few months back? it was a message, also look at their navy yards and what they are building; with steel from Pittsburgh no less.
Hell ya, anything for a buck, the American dream.
Reply -
Neutral
THOMNH621 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
so lets just throw out a thought, if Iran gets the bomb and nukes Israel what will the liberals course of action be. Lets just have an honest debate here, the left thinks we have why should we prevent Iran from having them, so for DISCUSSION sake lets say the get them and they stay true to their promise to NUKE Israel, what then.
Reply-
-
ML2007Comment removed: Retracted by user
-
Neutral
Tangent0011 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
If, say, Tel Aviv was leveled by an unprovoked nuclear strike, the US would certainly and justifiably respond with force. I'd imagine the response would still largely be of a conventional nature and avoid civilian targets as much as possible. I really doubt ANY US administration would choose the 'black glass' retaliation option. The risk of involving Russia and China in an all-out exchange is far too great.
Most likely, Israel responds on her own and turns Iran into a parking lot. If she did, well, bye bye Big Blue Marble!
Reply -
Neutral
fourthtunz1 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
THOMNH62 {{{{{so lets just throw out a thought, if Iran gets the bomb and nukes Israel what will the liberals course of action be. Lets just have an honest debate here, the left thinks we have why should we prevent Iran from having them, so for DISCUSSION sake lets say the get them and they stay true to their promise to NUKE Israel, what then.}}}}}
You must be making alot of money from Haliburton or the oil boom to keep spreading crap like this. As others have said Israel has plenty of nukes.
Why is it our job to protect the world? Why not the UN? This has nothing to do with liberals and you know it, this has to do with you believing the tv propaganda machine. Try doing your own thinking for once, your argument makes no sense,
Reply -
Neutral
DeadXXXManXXXTalkin1 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
'', if Iran gets the bomb and nukes Israel what will the liberals course of action be. ''
conjecture is fun but it gets boring after awhile
I guess in the wrong hands conjecture, or 'imagination' if you will, can be dangerous too
'What if'?
What if something bad happens? 'Let's make sure nothing bad happens by making something bad happen' Let's get Americans killed to keep Americans from getting killed[they probably WOULD just kill us here anyway, after all]
What if Saddam gets a nuclear weapon? {he got yellow cake, we swear]
What if Iran gets a nuclear weapon?
Who would be next?
where is the next place 'what if' 'may' 'could' and 'would' will lead us?
coulda woulda shoulda
conjecture is just tiresome after a while
Reply
-
-
Neutral
ChefEOD1 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
The rulers of Iran are on record stating that even the loss of 200 million Muslims would be a price worth paying if Israel & the US were destroyed in the process. All streams of Islam believe in a divine savior, known as the Mahdi, who will appear at the End of Days during chaos and apocalyptic times to bring the world under Islamic domain. Iran's leaders are ardent believers in the teachings if the Mahdi. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad personally believes it is his destiny to bring about the return of the Mahdi by creating the conditions necessary, which is world wide chaos; he feels that he is the John the Baptist for the Mahdi. The teachings basicaly say that when the world is in chaos (through whatever means) the Mahdi will return, bring peace (Islamic rule) and justice, and heal the planet. Think about that. Ahmadinejad must usher in world-wide chaos and war before he can fulfill his destiny.
Reply-
Neutral
antibrainwasher1 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
And the Israeli's believe that god chose them to have a racially pure religious state, and are ethnically cleansing their region, with the help of billions a month from the US for nukes, and the psy ops zionist american media, and the christian evangelical zionists crusaders, and the dual citizenship presidential advisers, you remember the neoconservatives, founded by the orthodox professor Kraus, perpetuated by his diciples in the neocon think tanks, and manifest in the war in Iraq?
Remember neocons republicans, liberal democracys will lead to the next holacaust. Good to know you control the 4th leg of this US two party "democracy."
How many nukes have the Saudi's bought? 300? How many have we given them?
You remember the Saudi's, the ones who planned, fiananced and executed 911?
Reply -
Neutral
Tangent0011 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Ahmadinejhad and his ilk are falling increasingly out of favor with the Iranian populace.
While a dirty bomb is well within the capability of just about ANY 'rogue nation', Iran is at least 7 years away from having a deployable tactical nuke.
As I see it, talk of 'preemption' against Iran suffers the same short-sightedness as Iraq. Iraq was the most secular of ME societies and its populace may have even been turned ever more pro-West if we hadn't caused such enormous suffering through cruel sanctions that did more to harm the people than hurt the regime. In the same vein, the people of Iran are increasingly embracing Western culture which may lead to a sea change in the regime. The next leader of Iran will almost assuredly be more moderate.
Reply -
-
-
Neutral
antibrainwasher1 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Seems like it's news that Iran is withholding info,
but what about N. Korea, Israel, Pakistan, and all the other lovely states?
When the enemies of Israel make news, the US news machine, owned by Zionists, set their propaganda machine in high gear.
Reply -
Neutral
ChefEOD1 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
When Ahmadinejad was elected in 2005, he told Iran that the world would be ending in two or three years. Tehran, Iran, Jan. 12; Speaking to a crowd in the southern city of Roudan, Hormozgan province, Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said that "the Islamic Republic's 1979 Islamic revolution was a great movement and a stepping stone to a final "great event" in the world. The Islamic Republic is the continuation of the path of the prophets which came to begin a great movement and the final occurrence. The Islamic revolution was a great leap in leading the people and reaching the climax of history".
Reply-
-
Neutral
bluetexasvalley1 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Chief, you did it again.
"The Islamic Republic [Christian movement] is the continuation of the path of the prophets which came to begin a great movement and the final occurrence [rapture]. The Islamic revolution [Evangelical movement]was a great leap in leading the people and reaching the climax of history [end times]".
See?
Reply
-
-
-
Neutral
Tangent0011 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Let's see...Which country's leader has been prominent the media, including accusations of collaboration with terrorist agencies? Does that country happen to have a large oil reserve?
If you guessed 'Venezuela', congratulations! You can pick your prize from this basket of brightly-colored 'My Pretty Pony' stickers!
Reply
-
-
Neutral
ChefEOD1 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
A common rumor - denied by the government but widely believed in Iran - is that Mr. Ahmadinejad and his cabinet have signed a "contract" pledging themselves to work for the return of the Mahdi and sent it to Jamkaran. Speaking at a government-sponsored conference on the subject one month into his administration he said, "The government from now renounces its economic development policies that were based on materialism and secular liberalism. Instead, there will be an effort to raise expectations at the coming of the Mahdi, and all domestic and foreign policy will work in that direction, this is the mission of the government."
Reply -
Neutral
ChefEOD1 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
At Ahmadinejad's international debut, his speech to the United Nations, World leaders had expected a conciliatory proposal to defuse the nuclear crisis after Teheran had restarted another part of its nuclear program that August. Instead, they heard the president speak in apocalyptic terms of Iran struggling against an evil West. The speech ended with the messianic appeal to God to "hasten the emergence of your last repository, the Promised One, (the Mahdi) that perfect and pure human being, the one that will fill this world with justice and peace". Justice & peace in the form of a world-wide Caliphate enforced by Islamic Law.
Reply -
Neutral
ChefEOD1 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
In a video distributed by an Iranian web site, Ahmadinejad described how one of his Iranian colleagues had claimed to have seen a glow of light around the president as he began his speech to the UN. "I felt it myself too," Ahmadinejad recounts. "I felt that all of a sudden the atmosphere changed there. And for 27-28 minutes all the leaders did not blink, It's not an exaggeration, because I was looking. They were astonished, as if a hand held them there and made them sit. It had opened their eyes and ears for the message of the Islamic Republic."
Reply -
Neutral
ChefEOD1 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Ahmadinejad is so convinced that he can speed up the Mahdi's arrival by creating the world chaos that must occur before the Mahdi's return that he has ordered everyone in Tehran to make the city ready for the Mahdi's return. That means getting rid of anyone who refuses to obey Sharia Law. The result has been wholesale hangings, beheadings, and stonings. Construction cranes in Iran are used more as mobile gallows than they are in construction. Women are stoned daily for the most trivial violations. There are no homosexuals in Iran because they kill them.
Reply -
Neutral
ChefEOD1 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Now, here's the kicker. Ahmadinejad is convinced that the alliance between the United States and Israel is the evil that he must destroy before the Mahdi will return. He even calls us the "Great Satan"
Benjamin Netanyahu was once asked what the Holocaust had taught him. His answered, "When someone says he wants to kill you, believe him."
"A just fear of an imminent danger, though there be no blow given, is a lawful cause of war."
Sir Francis Bacon
Reply-
Neutral
antibrainwasher1 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Well, chef, sounds like you should see if the Israeli airforce will let you sign up, assuming you aren't already signed up there for the Mausad, you sound like your ready to die for the cause. Good for you. What is the Israeli version of Heaven?
Don't worry, the RJC has things well in hand, you won't have to die when the americans are quiet willing to fight your wars for you, with their lives and treasure.
Reply -
Neutral
pcknowledge1 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Benjamin Netanyahu also said:
"Israel should have exploited the repression of the demonstrations in China, when world attention focused on that country, to carry out mass expulsions among the Arabs of the territories."
-- Benyamin Netanyahu, then Israeli Deputy Foreign Minister, former Prime Minister of Israel, speaking to students at Bar Ilan University, from the Israeli journal Hotam, November 24, 1989.
Reply
-
-
Neutral
THOMNH621 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
ML@))&, hey dill weed, it was a question not a theory and I see it still impossible to have a two sided debate here at libscape. I wasn't fear mongering you douche bag just throwing a hypothetical for discussion glad to see you libs never let me down. No possibility for honest debate just glib rhetoric from the left, go Hillary.
Reply -
Neutral
mr-breaker1 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
HAHAHAHA I though The war on Terror was supposed to prevent this. Fools you cant hold back technology just slow it down. Now we are ar war with Countries that posed no nuclear threat and Korea And Iran HAve Nukes Pointed at US. MAN someone needed to crash a plane into Bush's Daughter's wedding and wake his ass up!
Reply
Add a Comment
Sign In With Your Propeller Account
Please keep your comments relevant to this story.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.